Search found 274 matches

Don't count calendar days, wait 8-10, contact the MTO to get a written transcript that you are reinstated, then you can drive.

I don't think any JP will convict for a 1 second of squealing, that can be as you all described above, VS the guy who lays a 100 m long patch leaving the Tim's while his buddies cheers him on.

Wife gets motion sickness on rapid acceleration, and she didn't say a thing.

That's not exactly a reliable measurement....LOL...

Well I wasn't there, so it's hard for me to say anything else based on one side, would be interesting to hear from the officers...

...

...

Ok, I guess they aren't on this website...

Glad you dodged a biscuit.

Then that must vary from company to company, mine splits it 29 & Under and >30km/h...

Call a paralegal.

You're in a jackpot.

Well if we aren't catching 300,000 suspended drivers, I think we need to get stricter!

Secondly, nobody is ever found guilty on the spot, these all involve pleading guilty or being found guilty.

Today I'm out riding my own motorcycle, having posted something earlier I was in an enforcement mindframe (though off duty), so I started counting people ...

Not that it's difficult, but remember, squeaky wheels get the grease? Spin your tires by driving aggressively = stunt driving.

If you drive in a manner that shouts 'aggressive' expect people (police) to notice.

Take it to court.

Hmm....I'm concerned about your comment that because someone was 3 days on the job they can't do it properly...3 minutes after I was trained on RADAR I was able to use it properly and have never had a problem with, it's ridiculously simple to use...someone with 3 days on the job has a coach officer watching all their moves so request this officer's ...

Were you charged?

Nothing says you have to call them IMMEDIATELY.

Call them tomorrow. Not a big deal.

100% do not.

It's a municipal bylaw, as long as you pay them, it's not recorded on your driving history, if you don't you DL may not be renewed.

It's not part of the MTO database.

You might be right, but I thought the stop had to be "initiated" on the public highway (lights activated). I didn't think you could drive on to someones property and THEN flick on the cherries and commence with the demand for drivers license. This sticks in my mind from years ago... Might have even been an American site I was on.

The traffic ...

1) Let them do the talking.

2) The charge may depend on what's available in your local bylaws

3) Why not? You can make you're own pitch for a lesser offence, save the paralegals for the arguing bit, they're rather expensive and often don't do anything you couldn't.

Research your local bylaws, get a copy and bring it to the prosecution.

Advise the Justice that you were notified that disclosure was not available til Thursday, and the logistical issues around it, then request an adjournment, it won't be cited against you. It's the prosecution's delay.

Motorists caught driving minutes after losing licences
Almost 267,000 people have suspended licences in Ontario

CBC News

CBC News cameras caught a handful of men driving minutes after having their licences suspended — just a few examples of the vast number of people who continue to take to the road despite being barred from doing so, says a ...

On second thought, you are clearly writing some excellent English, seems like you are making a mockery of the justice system by asking for something you don't require to have a fair trial.

Why not just ask for a binary translator and just show up making a lot of beeping sounds?

Canada's two official languages are French and English...you are in ...

Yeah I've never seen anything but the ticket as disclosure...after all, the ticket offence info is right there...

Cyclists are vehicles...

If you insist, just sign your organ donor card, it's the right thing to do...

It may be legal where he's from...

+1

BTW The MTO recently sent us a suspended driver's database that indicates 7,000 suspended drivers in our jurisdiction...

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/2010/02/01/ontario-suspended-drivers613.html

Shows that 267,000 drivers are suspended in Ontario...I'm betting based on years and years of experience that a good portion of those are ...

A couple of bad apples don't spoil the whole barrel.

So two highway traffic acts? One for law abiders and one for law breakers? The law has to be the same for everyone and that's the same relating my earlier comment about good cops and bad cops, we all have to follow the same rules.

BTW: In your original post, you DID say "If police can't see ...

Speed and fuel economy studies


Steady speed fuel economy.

Fuel economy at steady speeds with selected vehicles was studied in 1973, 1984, and 1997. The most recent study[11] indicates greater fuel efficiency at higher speeds than earlier studies; for example, some vehicles achieve better mileage at 65 than at 45 mph (72 km/h),[11] although not ...

Not a moving violation. No points. It's a ticket sure. But does it make you a less safe driver cause you forgot your licence in your other pants? No.

Ahh....tinted windows...

Well let's see...

1. They make it harder for police to see if you are wearing your seatbelt. - Safety-
2. They make it harder for police to see if you are on your cell phone. -Safety-
3. They make it difficult to identify the driver. -Accountability-
4. They make it difficult to pedestrians and other drivers to make ...

Go to court on and speak to the prosecutor, plead to the licence if they drop the moving violation.

R. v. Lambert, [2009] B.C.J. No.1199 (QL)(S.C.).

Driver appealed his conviction for driving in excess of 90kph (he was going 126). Officer testified clocked two vehicles and stopped both. At trial officer agreed with defendant that there were other vehicles in the vicinity. He testified that those other vehicles did not interfere with his ability ...

No. Ontario owned / registered vehicles must conform to law of Ontario. Quebec has their rules for their vehicles, there's no way to obtain a second plate in Quebec.

Equipment like mufflers, window tint etc must conform to the roadways on which they operate regardless of home turf.

Not to mention the roadways were not intended for this type of behaviour...

THey've given you notice that the officer will not be there.

It's the same as is you sent them notice you wouldn't, you wouldn't be found guilty if you provided notice, but rescheduled.

Go win your case in July...