Hi everyone, I tried the search but didn't find much on this topic, so I would like to know if anyone here can clarify this situation for me. A friend of mine got his M2 in June of 2009, and has held a full G license for 6-7 years. AFAIK he has pleaded guilty to two minor (speeding) tickets, one in sept 2009, the other in Jan 2010. (Haven't seen an abstract yet so I'm not sure of dates/if there were any points associated with either of these). In Aug 2010, was stopped and ticketed for 20-over, 3 points, coming to trial soon. My question for y'all is how this driver will be affected by Escalating Sanctions in the following scenario. 1) If he has any points against his license from convictions prior to the August 1st introduction of escalating sanctions, and he picks up 3 points, does the license still get suspended? Or does the 4-point rule apply only to convictions for offences committed after Aug 1st? 2) None of the offences were committed while riding a motorcycle, all were in cars. Does that have any bearing on the sanctions? 3) If his license qualifies for suspension under the new Escalating Sanctions, does only the M2 Class get suspended, or do they suspend the G class as well? Thanks! slyk
Hi everyone,
I tried the search but didn't find much on this topic, so I would like to know if anyone here can clarify this situation for me.
A friend of mine got his M2 in June of 2009, and has held a full G license for 6-7 years. AFAIK he has pleaded guilty to two minor (speeding) tickets, one in sept 2009, the other in Jan 2010. (Haven't seen an abstract yet so I'm not sure of dates/if there were any points associated with either of these).
In Aug 2010, was stopped and ticketed for 20-over, 3 points, coming to trial soon.
My question for y'all is how this driver will be affected by Escalating Sanctions in the following scenario.
1) If he has any points against his license from convictions prior to the August 1st introduction of escalating sanctions, and he picks up 3 points, does the license still get suspended? Or does the 4-point rule apply only to convictions for offences committed after Aug 1st?
2) None of the offences were committed while riding a motorcycle, all were in cars. Does that have any bearing on the sanctions?
3) If his license qualifies for suspension under the new Escalating Sanctions, does only the M2 Class get suspended, or do they suspend the G class as well?
Thanks!
slyk
SLYK
-------------
"Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny." - Edmund Burke"
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal" - MLK Jr.
Here's the info on the MTO website. So yes, he has a hybrid licence and will face sanctions regardless of vehicle being operated at the time of the offence. Both licences will be suspended. That being said, the way I read the actual regulation (340/94) versus the MTO page, you have to be convicted of a single offence that carries 4 or more demerit points. They don't actually care about what your point total is until you hit 6 points. So if you're friend already had 2 points on his record, gets 3 more for 20 over, he'd still be safe with just 5 points. He'll get a warning letter, but no possible suspension until 6 points.
Here's the info on the MTO website.
Escalating Sanctions for all Novice Drivers (G1, G2, M1, M2)
Effective August 1, 2010, novice or hybrid drivers (drivers that hold a novice licence and full licence, e.g., G/M2) will be subject to Novice Driver Escalating Sanctions. These sanctions will apply if, within a five year period, you:
* are convicted of violating any of the graduated licensing conditions;
* are convicted of HTA offences that result in 4 or more demerit points; or,
* receive a court-ordered suspension for an HTA offence that would have resulted in 4 or more demerit points
Hybrid Drivers - Drivers that hold a novice licence and full licence, e.g., G/M2.
The penalties for Escalating Sanctions are as follows:
* 30-day licence suspension for the first occurrence; both full and novice drivers licence will be suspended.
* 90-day licence suspension for the second occurrence; both full and novice drivers licence will be suspended.
* Novice Licence cancellation for the third occurrence. Upon a third occurrence, your novice drivers licence will be cancelled. You must re-apply to the graduated licensing program by passing a vision and knowledge test and paying all licensing fees. After you pass these tests, you will enter Level One and get a Class G1 licence. You must serve all the Level One and Level Two waiting periods and start as a new driver. You will not receive any driving experience credit from your previous novice class. Your full drivers licence class will not be cancelled and a new licence card will be issued with your full class.
So yes, he has a hybrid licence and will face sanctions regardless of vehicle being operated at the time of the offence. Both licences will be suspended.
That being said, the way I read the actual regulation (340/94) versus the MTO page, you have to be convicted of a single offence that carries 4 or more demerit points. They don't actually care about what your point total is until you hit 6 points. So if you're friend already had 2 points on his record, gets 3 more for 20 over, he'd still be safe with just 5 points. He'll get a warning letter, but no possible suspension until 6 points.
So yes, he has a hybrid licence and will face sanctions regardless of vehicle being operated at the time of the offence. Both licences will be suspended. That being said, the way I read the actual regulation (340/94) versus the MTO page, you have to be convicted of a single offence that carries 4 or more demerit points. They don't actually care about what your point total is until you hit 6 points. So if you're friend already had 2 points on his record, gets 3 more for 20 over, he'd still be safe with just 5 points. He'll get a warning letter, but no possible suspension until 6 points. Thanks for clarifying that! As you can see, the MTO page suggests that if you accumulate a total of 4 points over the 5-year period, it results in a suspension. It's hard to believe that they will suspend both licenses and not just one... Anyway, thanks again for clearing that up for me. I will pass the info along to my friend and see what he thinks. I've suggested that he get his M asap to avoid being in this sort of situation.
Stanton wrote:
Here's the info on the MTO website.
Escalating Sanctions for all Novice Drivers (G1, G2, M1, M2)
Effective August 1, 2010, novice or hybrid drivers (drivers that hold a novice licence and full licence, e.g., G/M2) will be subject to Novice Driver Escalating Sanctions. These sanctions will apply if, within a five year period, you:
* are convicted of violating any of the graduated licensing conditions;
* are convicted of HTA offences that result in 4 or more demerit points; or,
* receive a court-ordered suspension for an HTA offence that would have resulted in 4 or more demerit points
Hybrid Drivers - Drivers that hold a novice licence and full licence, e.g., G/M2.
The penalties for Escalating Sanctions are as follows:
* 30-day licence suspension for the first occurrence; both full and novice drivers licence will be suspended.
* 90-day licence suspension for the second occurrence; both full and novice drivers licence will be suspended.
* Novice Licence cancellation for the third occurrence. Upon a third occurrence, your novice drivers licence will be cancelled. You must re-apply to the graduated licensing program by passing a vision and knowledge test and paying all licensing fees. After you pass these tests, you will enter Level One and get a Class G1 licence. You must serve all the Level One and Level Two waiting periods and start as a new driver. You will not receive any driving experience credit from your previous novice class. Your full drivers licence class will not be cancelled and a new licence card will be issued with your full class.
So yes, he has a hybrid licence and will face sanctions regardless of vehicle being operated at the time of the offence. Both licences will be suspended.
That being said, the way I read the actual regulation (340/94) versus the MTO page, you have to be convicted of a single offence that carries 4 or more demerit points. They don't actually care about what your point total is until you hit 6 points. So if you're friend already had 2 points on his record, gets 3 more for 20 over, he'd still be safe with just 5 points. He'll get a warning letter, but no possible suspension until 6 points.
Thanks for clarifying that!
As you can see, the MTO page suggests that if you accumulate a total of 4 points over the 5-year period, it results in a suspension. It's hard to believe that they will suspend both licenses and not just one...
Anyway, thanks again for clearing that up for me. I will pass the info along to my friend and see what he thinks. I've suggested that he get his M asap to avoid being in this sort of situation.
SLYK
-------------
"Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny." - Edmund Burke"
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal" - MLK Jr.
Again, that's just my interpretation of the regulation. I'm not a legal expert, so you may want to confirm that with someone else if you're friend's licence is riding on it. Here's the actual section from the o reg. Not sure if your friend's speeding ticket has already been reduced or not, but if he can get it reduced to 15 over by the Crown there will be no demerit points. FYI if he does upgrade to a full M, any convictions for offences that occurred while he was still a novice will have applicable novice suspensions applied to them.
Again, that's just my interpretation of the regulation. I'm not a legal expert, so you may want to confirm that with someone else if you're friend's licence is riding on it.
Here's the actual section from the o reg.
An offence under the Act set out in Column 1 of the Table to the Demerit Point Regulation for which the number of demerit points set out opposite thereto in Column 2 is four or more, regardless of whether or not demerit points have been recorded.
Not sure if your friend's speeding ticket has already been reduced or not, but if he can get it reduced to 15 over by the Crown there will be no demerit points.
Slyk wrote:
Anyway, thanks again for clearing that up for me. I will pass the info along to my friend and see what he thinks. I've suggested that he get his M asap to avoid being in this sort of situation.
FYI if he does upgrade to a full M, any convictions for offences that occurred while he was still a novice will have applicable novice suspensions applied to them.
FYI, not sure if you're friend's speeding ticket has already been reduced or not, but if he can it reduced to 15 over by the Crown there will be no demerit points. Thanks :) I looked up the reg after reading your post and found that section. It seems to read how you've described it, but perhaps it might be worth checking out further. I wonder who the legitimate authority to ask would be? Maybe someone at the crown's office or at the MTO? We are hoping to get the ticket reduced to 15 over (which is really not a stretch from 20 over), but the depending on the disclosure, the crown might not agree to it. Also, i'm not sure if the ticket was reduced at the roadside (my friend doesnt remember, but he thinks it might have been reduced from 25 over to 20 over, which IIRC is just a cost reduction and falls in the same points bracket, making it BS), but in any case, the local crown's office is really stingy on making deals.
Stanton wrote:
Again, that's just my interpretation of the regulation. I'm not a legal expert, so you may want to confirm that with someone else if you're friend's licence is riding on it.
Here's the actual section from the o reg.
An offence under the Act set out in Column 1 of the Table to the Demerit Point Regulation for which the number of demerit points set out opposite thereto in Column 2 is four or more, regardless of whether or not demerit points have been recorded.
FYI, not sure if you're friend's speeding ticket has already been reduced or not, but if he can it reduced to 15 over by the Crown there will be no demerit points.
Thanks I looked up the reg after reading your post and found that section. It seems to read how you've described it, but perhaps it might be worth checking out further. I wonder who the legitimate authority to ask would be? Maybe someone at the crown's office or at the MTO?
We are hoping to get the ticket reduced to 15 over (which is really not a stretch from 20 over), but the depending on the disclosure, the crown might not agree to it. Also, i'm not sure if the ticket was reduced at the roadside (my friend doesnt remember, but he thinks it might have been reduced from 25 over to 20 over, which IIRC is just a cost reduction and falls in the same points bracket, making it BS), but in any case, the local crown's office is really stingy on making deals.
SLYK
-------------
"Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny." - Edmund Burke"
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal" - MLK Jr.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…