Hello everyone, Recently three friends and I were coming back from a house party in which the driver had about 3 beers in about 2.5 hours. We were stopped by an officer and the driver agreed to take a breathalyser test. The driver has his full G class license and is 21 years old although he was born in 1990 and therefore will be turning 22 pretty soon. Unfortunately the reading gave him a "warn" which to my research qualifies you somewhere between .05-.08 (below the legal limit). The officers understanding of the law was that it was under 21 and not 21 and under so the driver was not given a charge for "Young driver with BAC over zero" however was still given a warn fine. The three days came up and he renewed his license and received his temporary one when he went into the license bureau and paid the fine. From speaking to others our age who have been charged under the young drivers act you are suppose to be given the white ticket fine in which you plead guilty to and pay or fight in court. In the event of paying (pleading guilty) you are then handed out an additional 30 day suspension. Now my question is, since he was not given the charge and never pleaded guilty to anything does that mean he got off lucky or will something further happen? I know that the 30 day suspension cannot be given without conviction and I am aware that the "warn" is not a ticket but a fine under the ADLS, will someone at the bureau pick up on this and send him a charge in the mail or just carry out the 30 day suspension regardless? It's very unfortunate to happen to my friend, he has always been the most responsible in our group of friends and this was really the first time he ever had that much and driven, we are all concerned and would be very appreciative of any advice that can be given concerning the future of his license and possible suspension. Thanks very much, 12345 and friends.
Hello everyone,
Recently three friends and I were coming back from a house party in which the driver had about 3 beers in about 2.5 hours. We were stopped by an officer and the driver agreed to take a breathalyser test. The driver has his full G class license and is 21 years old although he was born in 1990 and therefore will be turning 22 pretty soon. Unfortunately the reading gave him a "warn" which to my research qualifies you somewhere between .05-.08 (below the legal limit).
The officers understanding of the law was that it was under 21 and not 21 and under so the driver was not given a charge for "Young driver with BAC over zero" however was still given a warn fine. The three days came up and he renewed his license and received his temporary one when he went into the license bureau and paid the fine. From speaking to others our age who have been charged under the young drivers act you are suppose to be given the white ticket fine in which you plead guilty to and pay or fight in court. In the event of paying (pleading guilty) you are then handed out an additional 30 day suspension.
Now my question is, since he was not given the charge and never pleaded guilty to anything does that mean he got off lucky or will something further happen? I know that the 30 day suspension cannot be given without conviction and I am aware that the "warn" is not a ticket but a fine under the ADLS, will someone at the bureau pick up on this and send him a charge in the mail or just carry out the 30 day suspension regardless?
It's very unfortunate to happen to my friend, he has always been the most responsible in our group of friends and this was really the first time he ever had that much and driven, we are all concerned and would be very appreciative of any advice that can be given concerning the future of his license and possible suspension.
If your friend wasn't charged by the officer at the time of the incident, it's very unlikely anything further will come of it. Technically the police have up to six months from the date of the offence to proceed with a charge, but I don't see why they would at this point. Quite likely the officer was simply unaware of the new law or cut your friend a break. My only question is in regards to the fine. Are you talking about the $150 reinstatement fee? Or an actual fine? The only reason I ask is that an actual fine would indicate there was some type of charge laid as well. As you said there's no additional suspension without an actual charge. Oh, and FYI a roadside screening device will register a warn with a BAC between 0.05 and 0.099, so technically you can be over the legal limit and still register a warn.
If your friend wasn't charged by the officer at the time of the incident, it's very unlikely anything further will come of it. Technically the police have up to six months from the date of the offence to proceed with a charge, but I don't see why they would at this point. Quite likely the officer was simply unaware of the new law or cut your friend a break. My only question is in regards to the fine. Are you talking about the $150 reinstatement fee? Or an actual fine? The only reason I ask is that an actual fine would indicate there was some type of charge laid as well. As you said there's no additional suspension without an actual charge.
Oh, and FYI a roadside screening device will register a warn with a BAC between 0.05 and 0.099, so technically you can be over the legal limit and still register a warn.
Hi Stanton, thanks for the reply, The sheet received was a pink "Notice of suspension" slip in which the 150 dollar fee was the reinstatement fee for first time warn offence. The sheet quotes exactly this "This is a notice of suspension. This form is not used to lay a charge. You cannot get any information regarding this suspension notice or your driver's license suspension from a court office." We are praying that it was just either overlooked or given leniency as we were not aware that it was 21 and under too and had no idea of the harsh consequences, it was a terrifying wake up call for all of us as drivers. Thanks for the heads up on the .05 to .099 reading, we know there was no way he was over the legal limit and understand that is still no excuse. Zero tolerance, we have learned. Would appreciate any more advice especially from those in the law enforcement community. Thanks so much, 12345 and friends.
Stanton wrote:
If your friend wasn't charged by the officer at the time of the incident, it's very unlikely anything further will come of it. Technically the police have up to six months from the date of the offence to proceed with a charge, but I don't see why they would at this point. Quite likely the officer was simply unaware of the new law or cut your friend a break. My only question is in regards to the fine. Are you talking about the $150 reinstatement fee? Or an actual fine? The only reason I ask is that an actual fine would indicate there was some type of charge laid as well. As you said there's no additional suspension without an actual charge.
Oh, and FYI a roadside screening device will register a warn with a BAC between 0.05 and 0.099, so technically you can be over the legal limit and still register a warn.
Hi Stanton, thanks for the reply,
The sheet received was a pink "Notice of suspension" slip in which the 150 dollar fee was the reinstatement fee for first time warn offence. The sheet quotes exactly this "This is a notice of suspension. This form is not used to lay a charge. You cannot get any information regarding this suspension notice or your driver's license suspension from a court office." We are praying that it was just either overlooked or given leniency as we were not aware that it was 21 and under too and had no idea of the harsh consequences, it was a terrifying wake up call for all of us as drivers. Thanks for the heads up on the .05 to .099 reading, we know there was no way he was over the legal limit and understand that is still no excuse. Zero tolerance, we have learned.
Would appreciate any more advice especially from those in the law enforcement community.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…
