I received a ticket for failing to obey a stop sign in January 2013. Officer said it was a rolling stop. I requested disclosure and she wrote 15km/h in her notes, but did not radar me. The speed limit was 50km/h in the area. I fully intended to stop, and I yielded caution as it was a 4 way stop and proceeded only when it was safe to do so. I took it to court this past week and armed with the "knowledge" of Ticketcombat - got my trial adjourned for another 2 months. I say "knowledge" because it was adjourned since the JP and prosecutor felt that I needed to seek legal counsel to receive a fair trial as my questions apparently were not relevant. I nearly directly copied the questions from the website section specific to fighting a stop sign ticket and basically got laughed out of court. The prosecutor objected several times to my questions (most of which were asking if the officer saw my vehicle slow down, to which she testified she did not, even though she wrote 15km/h and the speed limit is 50km/h) and the JP agreed with the prosecutor. I asked about her estimate of speed and other similar questions and they were all objected. The JP then asked if I would like to take the stand for my defense. I said that I would like to exercise my right not to take the stand. The JP had an extremely puzzled look and stared at me, then the prosecutor. The prosecutor then said that it was basically ridiculous that I would not take the stand at my own defense, and the JP agreed. I stated again that I would not like to take the stand (this is my first ticket and they could easily trip me up accidentally). They basically tried to force me into taking the stand, which I feel was being taken advantage of since I don't understand 100% of the legal system. I only did a lot of reading on ticketcombat prior to my trial. So the JP suggested I seek legal counsel and adjourned my trial for 2 months. Which I thought was strange but good given all the objections presented by the prosecutor and agreeing JP. So my questions now, how do I proceed? What questions should I be asking? Apparently I focused on speed way too much is what the prosecutor told me after the trial. They did not provide me with the by-law for the stop sign but I could see them taking advantage of me in court again. I did not argue improper disclosure at the time. Please help! Thanks
I received a ticket for failing to obey a stop sign in January 2013. Officer said it was a rolling stop. I requested disclosure and she wrote 15km/h in her notes, but did not radar me. The speed limit was 50km/h in the area. I fully intended to stop, and I yielded caution as it was a 4 way stop and proceeded only when it was safe to do so.
I took it to court this past week and armed with the "knowledge" of Ticketcombat - got my trial adjourned for another 2 months. I say "knowledge" because it was adjourned since the JP and prosecutor felt that I needed to seek legal counsel to receive a fair trial as my questions apparently were not relevant. I nearly directly copied the questions from the website section specific to fighting a stop sign ticket and basically got laughed out of court. The prosecutor objected several times to my questions (most of which were asking if the officer saw my vehicle slow down, to which she testified she did not, even though she wrote 15km/h and the speed limit is 50km/h) and the JP agreed with the prosecutor. I asked about her estimate of speed and other similar questions and they were all objected.
The JP then asked if I would like to take the stand for my defense. I said that I would like to exercise my right not to take the stand. The JP had an extremely puzzled look and stared at me, then the prosecutor. The prosecutor then said that it was basically ridiculous that I would not take the stand at my own defense, and the JP agreed. I stated again that I would not like to take the stand (this is my first ticket and they could easily trip me up accidentally). They basically tried to force me into taking the stand, which I feel was being taken advantage of since I don't understand 100% of the legal system. I only did a lot of reading on ticketcombat prior to my trial.
So the JP suggested I seek legal counsel and adjourned my trial for 2 months. Which I thought was strange but good given all the objections presented by the prosecutor and agreeing JP.
So my questions now, how do I proceed? What questions should I be asking? Apparently I focused on speed way too much is what the prosecutor told me after the trial.
They did not provide me with the by-law for the stop sign but I could see them taking advantage of me in court again. I did not argue improper disclosure at the time.
If the trial has reached the point where its your opportunity to take the stand, you wont have any further opportunity to question the officer. Id also hesitate a guess that if the JP is surprised youre not taking the stand, youve yet to raise a reasonable doubt against the Crowns evidence. Thats not to say you should take the stand, but it might not hurt to seek professional legal advice. Ticket combat is a great site with lots of great advice but dont use it as your only source of information.
If the trial has reached the point where its your opportunity to take the stand, you wont have any further opportunity to question the officer. Id also hesitate a guess that if the JP is surprised youre not taking the stand, youve yet to raise a reasonable doubt against the Crowns evidence. Thats not to say you should take the stand, but it might not hurt to seek professional legal advice.
Ticket combat is a great site with lots of great advice but dont use it as your only source of information.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…