Kingston Ontario. Was pulled over for doing 82 in a 60. The written ticket says I was doing 74 in an 80 (she dropped the speed to save points) I believe this is a fatal error because there is no offence according to the ticket. There is no spot on the road I was on that is 80. Can they just edit the ticket? I have read that perhaps I should not go to the trial tomorrow to force the fatal error? I have gotten mixed info from cop friends. Comments quick please? Dave
Kingston Ontario. Was pulled over for doing 82 in a 60. The written ticket says I was doing 74 in an 80 (she dropped the speed to save points)
I believe this is a fatal error because there is no offence according to the ticket. There is no spot on the road I was on that is 80. Can they just edit the ticket?
I have read that perhaps I should not go to the trial tomorrow to force the fatal error? I have gotten mixed info from cop friends.
DO NOT go to trial tomorrow and force the fatal error. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... ote]Deemed not to dispute charge Action by justice (2) Where a defendant is deemed to not wish to dispute the charge, a justice shall examine the certificate of offence and shall, (b) where the certificate of offence is not complete and regular on its face, quash the proceeding. 2009, c. 33, Sched. 4, s. 1 (13).[/quote] If you go to trial, the courts will amend the ticket based on the officer's notes. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statut ... ]Amendment of information or certificate 34. (1) The court may, at any stage of the proceeding, amend the information or certificate as may be necessary if it appears that the information or certificate, (a) fails to state or states defectively anything that is requisite to charge the offence; (b) does not negative an exception that should be negatived; or (c) is in any way defective in substance or in form.[/quote] We have a lot of threads discussing London v. Young: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... ndon+Young
DO NOT go to trial tomorrow and force the fatal error.
34. (1) The court may, at any stage of the proceeding, amend the information or certificate as may be necessary if it appears that the information or certificate,
(a) fails to state or states defectively anything that is requisite to charge the offence;
(b) does not negative an exception that should be negatived; or
(c) is in any way defective in substance or in form.[/quote]
When I called OTT, they said if I do not go to the set trial tomorrow, they WILL convict me! Convict me of doing 74 in an 80! Is that the technicality? They can ONLY ammend if I am there? I took the ticket to the courthouse to set a trial date to fight the ticket. Does this have any bearing? I will read about the London/Young case to better understand
When I called OTT, they said if I do not go to the set trial tomorrow, they WILL convict me! Convict me of doing 74 in an 80! Is that the technicality? They can ONLY ammend if I am there?
I took the ticket to the courthouse to set a trial date to fight the ticket. Does this have any bearing? I will read about the London/Young case to better understand
I just got Absolute confirmation, indirectly from the Crown herself. If i don't show up and the set fine does not match the written offence, they will have to quash the ticket! Thanks iFLY55. What REALLY ticks me off is that when I called OTT, some loser Len could have told me that. Instead, he tried scare tactics about how going down the wrong line of questions and doing the wrong things could cost me!! Talked about how insurance could go way up for years to come!! He definitely knew he would have to do ABSOLUTELY nothing to win, and wanted to charge me $300 bucks!! People make me sick sometimes. Dave
I just got Absolute confirmation, indirectly from the Crown herself. If i don't show up and the set fine does not match the written offence, they will have to quash the ticket!
Thanks iFLY55.
What REALLY ticks me off is that when I called OTT, some loser Len could have told me that. Instead, he tried scare tactics about how going down the wrong line of questions and doing the wrong things could cost me!! Talked about how insurance could go way up for years to come!!
He definitely knew he would have to do ABSOLUTELY nothing to win, and wanted to charge me $300 bucks!! People make me sick sometimes.
It doesn't matter what path you choose 1) ignore the ticket 2) option 2 - early resolution 3) option 3 - trial date All three paths have the same conclusion if you don't appear; a justice of peace will have to review the face of the ticket and quash it if there is a fatal error. List of fatal errors: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1965.html London v. Young: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decision ... CA0429.htm
It doesn't matter what path you choose
1) ignore the ticket
2) option 2 - early resolution
3) option 3 - trial date
All three paths have the same conclusion if you don't appear; a justice of peace will have to review the face of the ticket and quash it if there is a fatal error.
Just to close this thread off.......dgupster's ticket was quashed since the fine didn't match the offence (I'm in very similar circumstances and wanted to confirm).
Just to close this thread off.......dgupster's ticket was quashed since the fine didn't match the offence (I'm in very similar circumstances and wanted to confirm).
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…