I was on my way to work on a divided four lane highway. I was in the right hand lane following the flow of traffic. There was a slower car ahead of me and I wanted to change lanes and maintain my speed. When I looked in my left side mirror, I notice a red car going pretty fast in the passing lane, so I slowed down and waited. Once the speeder had passed my car the passing lane was clear. I changed lanes, accelerated a bit, and started to overtake the slower car. I was just about to go back in the right hand lane when the speeder (still in the passing lane) put on its brakes, so I put on my brakes. The speeder put on its brakes again, so I put on my brakes again. At that point I figured there must be an accident or something, but I couldnt see anything in front of me, except a speeder trying to slow down. For a split second, I was thinking of going back in the right hand lane, but after putting on the brakes twice, I had lost track to the slower car in the right hand lane. So, I stayed in the passing lane behind the speeder and we both went slower and slower. We were crawling along in the passing lane when I noticed a police cruiser parked on the left. I figured the officer nabbed the speeder, and I was going to go along my marry way. The speeder stopped on the left side of the road and then the officer signalled me to stop as well, so I did. He claimed he clocked me doing 127 kph in a 100 zone. Im pretty sure he had the speeder clocked at 130 kph, and Im sure I wasnt going that fast. Could the officer have made a mistake, given the speeder was in front of me from the point I changed lanes?
I have used night vision to see the beam, very neat. However, we are not trained/ qualified to align a scope. That must be done by the repair facility. What we do is ensure the unit is sighting properly, if the lidar fails the test, we place it out of service and send it for repair on the next Purolator truck.
Reflections wrote:
Lidar used by officers is invisible to the naked eye. You can however use nightvision to see them. I wonder why officers are not using nightvision to align the scopes???
I have used night vision to see the beam, very neat.
However, we are not trained/ qualified to align a scope. That must be done by the repair facility. What we do is ensure the unit is sighting properly, if the lidar fails the test, we place it out of service and send it for repair on the next Purolator truck.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
To my use, I start observing vehicles about 1km away (through scope) monitor, then hit the vehicle with lidar around 700m. Then again around 550m. Then my final hit is around 500m-100m. This allows a visual observation, confirmed targetting history. The lidar beam is very concentrated being this close and any smog would be less than minimal affect. The addition of moisture in the air reduces the effective range of the lidar. ie light rain might reduce my first reading from 700m down to 500m. Snow is just horrible and a waste of my time using a lidar. It is not affecting the accuracy of the readings, just how far away a vehicle can be targetted.
Reflections wrote:
One thing though. I know that light travels at a constant speed in a vacuum. The atmosphere is not a vacuum. Dirt, smog.....all those airbourne particles can effect light. How would this be compensated for....? I know you're coming back to this 'bear so..... The further away a target is from the gun the more the "light" is going to slow down, simple physics. Is there a setting you have for "smoggy" days??? I know there are foul weather modes on different models. You cannot compensate for the unknown.
To my use, I start observing vehicles about 1km away (through scope) monitor, then hit the vehicle with lidar around 700m. Then again around 550m. Then my final hit is around 500m-100m. This allows a visual observation, confirmed targetting history. The lidar beam is very concentrated being this close and any smog would be less than minimal affect.
The addition of moisture in the air reduces the effective range of the lidar. ie light rain might reduce my first reading from 700m down to 500m. Snow is just horrible and a waste of my time using a lidar. It is not affecting the accuracy of the readings, just how far away a vehicle can be targetted.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
And at the end of the day, I would rather use lidar. At 100m Lidar = 30cm beam width Radar = 20 metres There is absolutely never any doubt with lidar which vehicle is travelling what speed. although......my best is at night, obtain a speed via radar/lidar, catch the vehicle and then pace it....then pull up beside and READ the drivers speedometer. (even more icing on the cake when the speedometer is digital :shock: )
And at the end of the day, I would rather use lidar.
At 100m
Lidar = 30cm beam width
Radar = 20 metres
There is absolutely never any doubt with lidar which vehicle is travelling what speed.
although......my best is at night, obtain a speed via radar/lidar, catch the vehicle and then pace it....then pull up beside and READ the drivers speedometer. (even more icing on the cake when the speedometer is digital )
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
New civic's are very nice for you...... Your style is very thorough. Next time you have the oppertunity on a smoggy day, light someone up from 1 km and keep the gun on them. If the speed decreases the closer they get closer then there is some effect. I know you'll say they let they're foot off the gas but this would help prove the theory.
New civic's are very nice for you......
Your style is very thorough. Next time you have the oppertunity on a smoggy day, light someone up from 1 km and keep the gun on them. If the speed decreases the closer they get closer then there is some effect.
I know you'll say they let they're foot off the gas but this would help prove the theory.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
Your style is very thorough. Next time you have the oppertunity on a smoggy day, light someone up from 1 km and keep the gun on them. If the speed decreases the closer they get closer then there is some effect.
I know you'll say they let they're foot off the gas but this would help prove the theory.
I'll give that a shot....pardon the pun!!
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
The best way is to store your pictures on any free file storing website. www.Photobucket.com is free and provides 1 GB of free space. Once you have uploaded your picture you can simply post your picture/image on this forum using bbcode: Code: Select all [img]http://your-image-link-goes-here.com/image.jpg[/img]
Imax wrote:
Is there a way of uploading pics on this forum? I have a few NURBS pics.
The best way is to store your pictures on any free file storing website.
thanks admin. It's working :lol: NURBS setup. Two cars, one at 500m and one at 570m. Laser offset, 10m. The laser beam is a cone, 600m long and 1.8m at the base. A perspecive: Close up view: When looking at the close up, its not too bad. Any beam hitting the side of car one wont be received by a lidar. But my NURBS model for car 1 and 2 arent realistic. They are two blocks, one on top of the other. Ive missed on important aspect, side view mirrors.
thanks admin. It's working
NURBS setup. Two cars, one at 500m and one at 570m. Laser offset, 10m. The laser beam is a cone, 600m long and 1.8m at the base.
A perspecive:
Close up view:
When looking at the close up, its not too bad. Any beam hitting the side of car one wont be received by a lidar. But my NURBS model for car 1 and 2 arent realistic. They are two blocks, one on top of the other. Ive missed on important aspect, side view mirrors.
Good shots and they explain a lot. As much as they are not "perfect" they do demonstrate the problems facing officers. The third one's the best.....good job.
Good shots and they explain a lot. As much as they are not "perfect" they do demonstrate the problems facing officers. The third one's the best.....good job.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
maybe a mod can spilt this over to the law enforcement tools area... somewhere above this.... ************************************* seeing that a lane is 3.75m wide a typical car is 2.6m wide.......beam width is still less than the width of the car. At 500m beam is 1.5m wide. One at 570m...round it to even 1.8m for simplicity sake. Your "blocks" are realistic for Jeeps and Hummers :)
maybe a mod can spilt this over to the law enforcement tools area... somewhere above this....
*************************************
seeing that a lane is 3.75m wide a typical car is 2.6m wide.......beam width is still less than the width of the car.
At 500m beam is 1.5m wide. One at 570m...round it to even 1.8m for simplicity sake.
Your "blocks" are realistic for Jeeps and Hummers
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
You can still see that it is difficult to target the plate..... And like you said you can't see the beam even under alignment checks. The officer still does not know "exactly" where the beam is.......at a distance of 500 meters 1 degree is a lot, even 0.5 degrees of misalignment will cause this situation.
You can still see that it is difficult to target the plate..... And like you said you can't see the beam even under alignment checks. The officer still does not know "exactly" where the beam is.......at a distance of 500 meters 1 degree is a lot, even 0.5 degrees of misalignment will cause this situation.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
You are right, this thread is too long and discussion of lidars hijacked the thread. I shall have admin make me a mod for this section too and split it off.
hwybear wrote:
maybe a mod can spilt this over to the law enforcement tools area... somewhere above this....
*************************************
seeing that a lane is 3.75m wide a typical car is 2.6m wide.......beam width is still less than the width of the car.
At 500m beam is 1.5m wide. One at 570m...round it to even 1.8m for simplicity sake.
Your "blocks" are realistic for Jeeps and Hummers
You are right, this thread is too long and discussion of lidars hijacked the thread. I shall have admin make me a mod for this section too and split it off.
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
I still do not see it when the beam is not relative to the distance. Nor are the size of vehicles. It to one perspective is construed, something like stats are! :D
Reflections wrote:
You can still see that it is difficult to target the plate..... And like you said you can't see the beam even under alignment checks. The officer still does not know "exactly" where the beam is.......at a distance of 500 meters 1 degree is a lot, even 0.5 degrees of misalignment will cause this situation.
I still do not see it when the beam is not relative to the distance. Nor are the size of vehicles. It to one perspective is construed, something like stats are!
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
OK try this one: The ideallogy of the designer is that the plate is the target. Ideally it is the first thing hit, being at the front of the car. What happens when the plate is not the first thing to be hit??????????? That info is locked up in the designers head and won't be released due to the fact that it can be used by the other companies.
OK try this one: The ideallogy of the designer is that the plate is the target. Ideally it is the first thing hit, being at the front of the car. What happens when the plate is not the first thing to be hit??????????? That info is locked up in the designers head and won't be released due to the fact that it can be used by the other companies.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
The diagram still does not relate properly. I must be missing something in the description....all of a sudden we go from vehicles to a plate? If it is to mean two targets at the same time....the lidar will not compute that and gives the operator an error.
The diagram still does not relate properly. I must be missing something in the description....all of a sudden we go from vehicles to a plate?
If it is to mean two targets at the same time....the lidar will not compute that and gives the operator an error.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Hi Bear: Thats what Im wondering about. A lidar doesnt send a constant beam, but a series of pulses. Theres a microprocessor inside the lidar which tries to make sense of all signals received from all those pulses. Its going to try to get an average speed and throw out what could be noise. What if it locks onto car1s speed and thinks car2s speed is noise?
Hi Bear:
Thats what Im wondering about. A lidar doesnt send a constant beam, but a series of pulses. Theres a microprocessor inside the lidar which tries to make sense of all signals received from all those pulses. Its going to try to get an average speed and throw out what could be noise. What if it locks onto car1s speed and thinks car2s speed is noise?
The lidar sends out more than 60 pulses per second. If 2 vehicles happen to be in the same beam, it will reject both and display an error message and NO speed reading. I am an operator of the unit, not an instructor, nor a scientist. If a dentist can use a lidar to fix my tooth or optometrist can fix my eyeball or military to guide bombs or reconstructionists to investigate traffic collisions, I think lidar is pretty precise.
Imax wrote:
A lidar doesnt send a constant beam, but a series of pulses. Theres a microprocessor inside the lidar which tries to make sense of all signals received from all those pulses. Its going to try to get an average speed and throw out what could be noise. What if it locks onto car1s speed and thinks car2s speed is noise?
The lidar sends out more than 60 pulses per second. If 2 vehicles happen to be in the same beam, it will reject both and display an error message and NO speed reading. I am an operator of the unit, not an instructor, nor a scientist. If a dentist can use a lidar to fix my tooth or optometrist can fix my eyeball or military to guide bombs or reconstructionists to investigate traffic collisions, I think lidar is pretty precise.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
The lidar sends out more than 60 pulses per second. If 2 vehicles happen to be in the same beam, it will reject both and display an error message and NO speed reading. I am an operator of the unit, not an instructor, nor a scientist. If a dentist can use a lidar to fix my tooth or optometrist can fix my eyeball or military to guide bombs or reconstructionists to investigate traffic collisions, I think lidar is pretty precise. When the beam is sent it hits the entire car. The gun will recieve the reflections from every point that is facing the gun. Thus, the amount of filtering done by the gun is extremely large. Now, when you target just the front plate, you are hitting the entire front end of the car. There are 3 good targets on the front of a vehicle, the plate and the 2 headlights. What you are saying about multiple targets doesn't add up.
hwybear wrote:
Imax wrote:
A lidar doesnt send a constant beam, but a series of pulses. Theres a microprocessor inside the lidar which tries to make sense of all signals received from all those pulses. Its going to try to get an average speed and throw out what could be noise. What if it locks onto car1s speed and thinks car2s speed is noise?
The lidar sends out more than 60 pulses per second. If 2 vehicles happen to be in the same beam, it will reject both and display an error message and NO speed reading. I am an operator of the unit, not an instructor, nor a scientist. If a dentist can use a lidar to fix my tooth or optometrist can fix my eyeball or military to guide bombs or reconstructionists to investigate traffic collisions, I think lidar is pretty precise.
When the beam is sent it hits the entire car. The gun will recieve the reflections from every point that is facing the gun. Thus, the amount of filtering done by the gun is extremely large. Now, when you target just the front plate, you are hitting the entire front end of the car. There are 3 good targets on the front of a vehicle, the plate and the 2 headlights. What you are saying about multiple targets doesn't add up.
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
I dont doubt that if two vehicles are in the same beam, experience says that a lidar will reject both and display an error message and no speed reading. I have no problems in seeing a lidar being able to get the speed of car1, but the angles for car2 are really tight. Im guessing the lidar for car2 would need to be moved from whats in the NURBS pics, possibly aiming at the closest headlight. Given the tight angle and beam divergence, I can only see two possibilities. The lidar is reading car1 speed or its reading an error message.
I dont doubt that if two vehicles are in the same beam, experience says that a lidar will reject both and display an error message and no speed reading. I have no problems in seeing a lidar being able to get the speed of car1, but the angles for car2 are really tight. Im guessing the lidar for car2 would need to be moved from whats in the NURBS pics, possibly aiming at the closest headlight. Given the tight angle and beam divergence, I can only see two possibilities. The lidar is reading car1 speed or its reading an error message.
That is a better explanation of what I have been saying.......that IF the pictures were to scale (ie vehicles should be 2.6m wide) then there might be less chance a lidar could get #2. Veh 1 width of 2.6m, 500m the beam is 1.5m wide...therefore the whole beam can be placed on the car... Veh 2 width is 2.6m, 570m the beam width is 1.71m wide...therfore the whole beam can be placed on the car. Now what we have is the angle from the lidar to the vehicles, on a angle, can it target the 2nd vehicle? There is also sideways movement within the lane (as it is 3.75m wide) that also is not taken into account. Which each vehicle could move 1.15m left or right. This could add up to another 2.30m of lateral difference.
Imax wrote:
I have no problems in seeing a lidar being able to get the speed of car1, but the angles for car2 are really tight.
That is a better explanation of what I have been saying.......that IF the pictures were to scale (ie vehicles should be 2.6m wide) then there might be less chance a lidar could get #2.
Veh 1 width of 2.6m, 500m the beam is 1.5m wide...therefore the whole beam can be placed on the car...
Veh 2 width is 2.6m, 570m the beam width is 1.71m wide...therfore the whole beam can be placed on the car.
Now what we have is the angle from the lidar to the vehicles, on a angle, can it target the 2nd vehicle? There is also sideways movement within the lane (as it is 3.75m wide) that also is not taken into account. Which each vehicle could move 1.15m left or right. This could add up to another 2.30m of lateral difference.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Another "angle".........If you, the officer, can't get a reading off the plate of a vehicle then you are told to aim at the headlight. Would an officer try to get the second vehicle with only the headlight, drivers side, and mistakenly sample the first car?
Another "angle".........If you, the officer, can't get a reading off the plate of a vehicle then you are told to aim at the headlight. Would an officer try to get the second vehicle with only the headlight, drivers side, and mistakenly sample the first car?
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com
In the training I have received.....we have always been told to target the front licence plate, if no plate, front centre between headlights OR on occassion the rear plate.....NEVER anywhere else and NEVER a partial corner (ie corner headlight) that is just stupid and not being used properly. I am not that hard up for tickets to start corner jabbing vehicles. There will be another vehicle come along if I wait long enough. I won't lose sleep over it as the vehicles are still travelling even when I'm home.
In the training I have received.....we have always been told to target the front licence plate, if no plate, front centre between headlights OR on occassion the rear plate.....NEVER anywhere else and NEVER a partial corner (ie corner headlight) that is just stupid and not being used properly.
I am not that hard up for tickets to start corner jabbing vehicles. There will be another vehicle come along if I wait long enough. I won't lose sleep over it as the vehicles are still travelling even when I'm home.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Hi Bear: I like your new avatar. Must check donut specifications - diameter, glazing thickness, and, most important, freshness. :) Ive never used a lidar. :oops: I look at health products and products that can have an impact on health. I cant see how a lidar can measure the speed of car2. The angles are too tight.
Hi Bear:
I like your new avatar. Must check donut specifications - diameter, glazing thickness, and, most important, freshness.
Ive never used a lidar.
I look at health products and products that can have an impact on health. I cant see how a lidar can measure the speed of car2. The angles are too tight.
Simply, if it's in too close to V1 then it can not be targeted. Now having said that, has the officer watched these 2 vehicles over time and neither appear to be gaining or pulling away from the other....then going relatively the same speed(within 5km/hr of each other). Could stop the 2nd one for speeding OR even follow too close.
Imax wrote:
I cant see how a lidar can measure the speed of car2. The angles are too tight.
Simply, if it's in too close to V1 then it can not be targeted.
Now having said that, has the officer watched these 2 vehicles over time and neither appear to be gaining or pulling away from the other....then going relatively the same speed(within 5km/hr of each other). Could stop the 2nd one for speeding OR even follow too close.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Hi Bear: As possibly the only one with lidar experience on this board, have you ever clocked two cars, one at 500 m and the other directly behind at 570m, and then managed to stop both cars by yourself ? (without causing an accident :) )
Hi Bear:
As possibly the only one with lidar experience on this board, have you ever clocked two cars, one at 500 m and the other directly behind at 570m, and then managed to stop both cars by yourself ? (without causing an accident )
I can only remember one of those types of stops about 3yrs ago. I have clocked 2 vehicles before (in the 150-155km/hr range) and successfully stopped both. This was about 3yrs ago (pre 172 era) I still remember the one vehicle (unusual vehicle travelling that speed) but don't remember the distances. The most I have stopped at once is 9 vehicles. Great big line of vehicles, so I took out the lead vehicle and the 8 others stopped :shock: ....all related and travelling together!! That was before the car-pool era!
Imax wrote:
Hi Bear:
As possibly the only one with lidar experience on this board, have you ever clocked two cars, one at 500 m and the other directly behind at 570m, and then managed to stop both cars by yourself ? (without causing an accident )
I can only remember one of those types of stops about 3yrs ago. I have clocked 2 vehicles before (in the 150-155km/hr range) and successfully stopped both. This was about 3yrs ago (pre 172 era) I still remember the one vehicle (unusual vehicle travelling that speed) but don't remember the distances.
The most I have stopped at once is 9 vehicles. Great big line of vehicles, so I took out the lead vehicle and the 8 others stopped ....all related and travelling together!! That was before the car-pool era!
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…