It happened 10 days ago in Norht-West Mississauga. I was driving in right line on two line road, speed about 40-45km/Hr, around 7pm. suddenly the car in front of me started slowing down, I slowed down as well, then checked left line in mirror, signaled and started moving left to pass, the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him. The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for Careless Driving, $400. My driving record: I am 42 years old, G Licensed, no accidents and one ticket from last year: improper use of HOV line. Should I go to court? Any chance to have it reduced? Or just pay ticket immediately. I have 4 days left to make a dessission.... Thanks a lot got your advices!
It happened 10 days ago in Norht-West Mississauga. I was driving in right line on two line road, speed about 40-45km/Hr, around 7pm. suddenly the car in front of me started slowing down, I slowed down as well, then checked left line in mirror, signaled and started moving left to pass, the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him.
The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for Careless Driving, $400.
My driving record: I am 42 years old, G Licensed, no accidents and one ticket from last year: improper use of HOV line.
Should I go to court? Any chance to have it reduced? Or just pay ticket immediately. I have 4 days left to make a dessission....
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
daggx thanks a lot for the respond! the officer was very upset and wanted to punish me. Unfortunately he is the only witness. I read hundreds of posts here. But still need an advice: shoud I go for option 2: early resolution, or request trail?
daggx thanks a lot for the respond!
the officer was very upset and wanted to punish me. Unfortunately he is the only witness.
I read hundreds of posts here. But still need an advice: shoud I go for option 2: early resolution, or request trail?
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on. I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward) If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless. Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing) Might want to get disclosier first . Cheers Viper1
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
I would pick option 3 and request a trial, this option gives you the most flexibility. If you decided later on that you don't want a trial after all you can always change your mind and make a deal with the prosecution for a lower charge or plead guilty. For now request a trial and then wait for your court date to come in the mail, once it does make a formal request for disclosure. Once you have disclosure you will be able to review all the evidence the prosecution is going to use against you at trial and then you can decide what you want to do from there.
I would pick option 3 and request a trial, this option gives you the most flexibility. If you decided later on that you don't want a trial after all you can always change your mind and make a deal with the prosecution for a lower charge or plead guilty. For now request a trial and then wait for your court date to come in the mail, once it does make a formal request for disclosure. Once you have disclosure you will be able to review all the evidence the prosecution is going to use against you at trial and then you can decide what you want to do from there.
thanks Viper1! I checked before changing the line, there was no car in the left line. When I changed the line and saw headlights in my rear mirror - i was shocked! that's why i think he was in the right line, few cars behind, or had no lights on.. I accelerate to give him more space, after about 10 seconds he turned on those red/blue/white emergency lights and i pulled overr. 'what did you do!, you blocked me the line! you could've killed me!' took my papers and after about 10-15 minutes came back with the ticket. no other explanation...
viper1 wrote:
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
thanks Viper1!
I checked before changing the line, there was no car in the left line. When I changed the line and saw headlights in my rear mirror - i was shocked!
that's why i think he was in the right line, few cars behind, or had no lights on.. I accelerate to give him more space, after about 10 seconds he turned on those red/blue/white emergency lights and i pulled overr.
'what did you do!, you blocked me the line! you could've killed me!' took my papers and after about 10-15 minutes came back with the ticket.
Thanks daggx! should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
daggx wrote:
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
Thanks daggx!
should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
Thanks daggx! should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial? If you're going to hire a paralegal, it would be as soon as possible. He will need to prepare, request, and review any documents related to the trial.
Sad wrote:
daggx wrote:
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
Thanks daggx!
should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
If you're going to hire a paralegal, it would be as soon as possible. He will need to prepare, request, and review any documents related to the trial.
I'd probably go with a paralegal, they are cheaper then lawyers and for traffic matters are usually just as good. Check out a couple different firms and see which one you like the best.
I'd probably go with a paralegal, they are cheaper then lawyers and for traffic matters are usually just as good. Check out a couple different firms and see which one you like the best.
Let me get this straight. You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each). You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane). Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles. If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding. The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated. If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles). Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
Let me get this straight.
You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each).
You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane).
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated.
If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles).
Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
I believe the original poster stated the officer was traveling behind and they switched lanes at the same time. If I had to guess what happened in this whole situation based on my own driving experience, I would say the driver charged probably isn't very confident in their lane changing. In the moment since checking for other vehicles, there was an officer behind who had already quickly assessed the situation and was able to switch lanes before having to slow down to the slower traffic in front. The driver in front, not realizing how quickly traffic behind will change lanes in order to not have to be impeded, pulled out without maintaining speed and caused a near accident. I was not there, but to be honest, I don't find the original story here too convincing. I'm not the judge though, so my opinion doesn't matter in the end.
tdottopcop wrote:
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
I believe the original poster stated the officer was traveling behind and they switched lanes at the same time.
If I had to guess what happened in this whole situation based on my own driving experience, I would say the driver charged probably isn't very confident in their lane changing. In the moment since checking for other vehicles, there was an officer behind who had already quickly assessed the situation and was able to switch lanes before having to slow down to the slower traffic in front. The driver in front, not realizing how quickly traffic behind will change lanes in order to not have to be impeded, pulled out without maintaining speed and caused a near accident.
I was not there, but to be honest, I don't find the original story here too convincing. I'm not the judge though, so my opinion doesn't matter in the end.
Thanks [tdottopcop], your description is correct and I do not say the police officer is at fault. I changed the line and nearly caused an accident. My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
tdottopcop wrote:
Let me get this straight.
You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each).
You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane).
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated.
If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles).
Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
Thanks [tdottopcop], your description is correct and I do not say the police officer is at fault. I changed the line and nearly caused an accident.
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal. If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer. Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
Sad wrote:
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal.
If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer.
Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal. If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer. Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason. Sad: Stanton's right on the money with his advice here. And Viper1's is way off.
Stanton wrote:
Sad wrote:
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this 'careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal.
If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer.
Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
Sad: Stanton's right on the money with his advice here. And Viper1's is way off.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
This is curious. Because I thought the police are required to also obey speed limits? If he changed lanes into left lane and started accelerating above the speed limit which ended up cutting you off in a way, well isn't that speeding and careless on the cops end? If he had had lights on then it should be ok because the police is then trying to get to a emergency call etc..and you would see it most likely and be required to Yield. So does this mean that police can speed without having their lights on?
viper1 wrote:
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
Sad wrote:
the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him.
The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for 'Careless Driving, $400.
This is curious. Because I thought the police are required to also obey speed limits? If he changed lanes into left lane and started accelerating above the speed limit which ended up cutting you off in a way, well isn't that speeding and careless on the cops end? If he had had lights on then it should be ok because the police is then trying to get to a emergency call etc..and you would see it most likely and be required to Yield.
So does this mean that police can speed without having their lights on?
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…
