It happened 10 days ago in Norht-West Mississauga. I was driving in right line on two line road, speed about 40-45km/Hr, around 7pm. suddenly the car in front of me started slowing down, I slowed down as well, then checked left line in mirror, signaled and started moving left to pass, the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him. The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for Careless Driving, $400. My driving record: I am 42 years old, G Licensed, no accidents and one ticket from last year: improper use of HOV line. Should I go to court? Any chance to have it reduced? Or just pay ticket immediately. I have 4 days left to make a dessission.... Thanks a lot got your advices!
It happened 10 days ago in Norht-West Mississauga. I was driving in right line on two line road, speed about 40-45km/Hr, around 7pm. suddenly the car in front of me started slowing down, I slowed down as well, then checked left line in mirror, signaled and started moving left to pass, the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him.
The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for Careless Driving, $400.
My driving record: I am 42 years old, G Licensed, no accidents and one ticket from last year: improper use of HOV line.
Should I go to court? Any chance to have it reduced? Or just pay ticket immediately. I have 4 days left to make a dessission....
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
daggx thanks a lot for the respond! the officer was very upset and wanted to punish me. Unfortunately he is the only witness. I read hundreds of posts here. But still need an advice: shoud I go for option 2: early resolution, or request trail?
daggx thanks a lot for the respond!
the officer was very upset and wanted to punish me. Unfortunately he is the only witness.
I read hundreds of posts here. But still need an advice: shoud I go for option 2: early resolution, or request trail?
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on. I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward) If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless. Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing) Might want to get disclosier first . Cheers Viper1
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
I would pick option 3 and request a trial, this option gives you the most flexibility. If you decided later on that you don't want a trial after all you can always change your mind and make a deal with the prosecution for a lower charge or plead guilty. For now request a trial and then wait for your court date to come in the mail, once it does make a formal request for disclosure. Once you have disclosure you will be able to review all the evidence the prosecution is going to use against you at trial and then you can decide what you want to do from there.
I would pick option 3 and request a trial, this option gives you the most flexibility. If you decided later on that you don't want a trial after all you can always change your mind and make a deal with the prosecution for a lower charge or plead guilty. For now request a trial and then wait for your court date to come in the mail, once it does make a formal request for disclosure. Once you have disclosure you will be able to review all the evidence the prosecution is going to use against you at trial and then you can decide what you want to do from there.
thanks Viper1! I checked before changing the line, there was no car in the left line. When I changed the line and saw headlights in my rear mirror - i was shocked! that's why i think he was in the right line, few cars behind, or had no lights on.. I accelerate to give him more space, after about 10 seconds he turned on those red/blue/white emergency lights and i pulled overr. 'what did you do!, you blocked me the line! you could've killed me!' took my papers and after about 10-15 minutes came back with the ticket. no other explanation...
viper1 wrote:
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
thanks Viper1!
I checked before changing the line, there was no car in the left line. When I changed the line and saw headlights in my rear mirror - i was shocked!
that's why i think he was in the right line, few cars behind, or had no lights on.. I accelerate to give him more space, after about 10 seconds he turned on those red/blue/white emergency lights and i pulled overr.
'what did you do!, you blocked me the line! you could've killed me!' took my papers and after about 10-15 minutes came back with the ticket.
Thanks daggx! should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
daggx wrote:
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
Thanks daggx!
should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
Thanks daggx! should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial? If you're going to hire a paralegal, it would be as soon as possible. He will need to prepare, request, and review any documents related to the trial.
Sad wrote:
daggx wrote:
From your description Careless Driving sounds like an excessively high charge, I would fight it. At the very least you can probably plea bargain it down to a less serious charge such as "Change lane not in safety" which sounds like a more accurate description of what happened. Since Careless Driving is a pretty serous charge, it might be worth it to hire a paralegal to represent you, especially if you want to go to trial and try to beat the charge out right.
Thanks daggx!
should i hire a paralegal right now, or just for the trial?
If you're going to hire a paralegal, it would be as soon as possible. He will need to prepare, request, and review any documents related to the trial.
I'd probably go with a paralegal, they are cheaper then lawyers and for traffic matters are usually just as good. Check out a couple different firms and see which one you like the best.
I'd probably go with a paralegal, they are cheaper then lawyers and for traffic matters are usually just as good. Check out a couple different firms and see which one you like the best.
Let me get this straight. You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each). You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane). Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles. If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding. The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated. If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles). Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
Let me get this straight.
You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each).
You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane).
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated.
If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles).
Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
I believe the original poster stated the officer was traveling behind and they switched lanes at the same time. If I had to guess what happened in this whole situation based on my own driving experience, I would say the driver charged probably isn't very confident in their lane changing. In the moment since checking for other vehicles, there was an officer behind who had already quickly assessed the situation and was able to switch lanes before having to slow down to the slower traffic in front. The driver in front, not realizing how quickly traffic behind will change lanes in order to not have to be impeded, pulled out without maintaining speed and caused a near accident. I was not there, but to be honest, I don't find the original story here too convincing. I'm not the judge though, so my opinion doesn't matter in the end.
tdottopcop wrote:
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
I believe the original poster stated the officer was traveling behind and they switched lanes at the same time.
If I had to guess what happened in this whole situation based on my own driving experience, I would say the driver charged probably isn't very confident in their lane changing. In the moment since checking for other vehicles, there was an officer behind who had already quickly assessed the situation and was able to switch lanes before having to slow down to the slower traffic in front. The driver in front, not realizing how quickly traffic behind will change lanes in order to not have to be impeded, pulled out without maintaining speed and caused a near accident.
I was not there, but to be honest, I don't find the original story here too convincing. I'm not the judge though, so my opinion doesn't matter in the end.
Thanks [tdottopcop], your description is correct and I do not say the police officer is at fault. I changed the line and nearly caused an accident. My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
tdottopcop wrote:
Let me get this straight.
You are travelling in the far right lane of a TWO LANE highway (two lanes in each direction each).
You changed lanes from the far RIGHT lane, into the LEFT lane (the passing lane).
Traffic happened to be traveling in this lane. As you changed into this lane, you nearly caused an accident by not yielding to the passing vehicles.
If I have the story straight, then the police officer is not at fault- you are. You nearly caused an accident by changing lanes into a lane without yielding.
The officer has no requirement to have his emergency lights and/or siren activated.
If I don't have the scenerio correct as I described, then let it be known... but if I do, you are at fault and the ticket appears to be correct for the situation (driving without due care or attention for other vehicles).
Regardless, you'll likely be given the oppourtunity to have this charge plea bargained to a lesser offence after speaking with a prosecutor.
Thanks [tdottopcop], your description is correct and I do not say the police officer is at fault. I changed the line and nearly caused an accident.
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal. If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer. Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
Sad wrote:
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal.
If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer.
Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal. If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer. Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason. Sad: Stanton's right on the money with his advice here. And Viper1's is way off.
Stanton wrote:
Sad wrote:
My question iss: do I have any chance to have this 'careless driving charge reduced to lesser one, for example 'Change lane not in safety' and asking advice how to act: go to trial or request early resolution...
If there's no accident and nobody was hurt, I'd say it's pretty much a certainty you'll be offered a plea deal.
If youre content pleading down the charge to something less serious (i.e. change lane not in safety), Id skip hiring a paralegal for now. Attend a resolution meeting and see what the Crown is willing to offer.
Id only spend money on a paralegal if you want to fight the charge outright or don't get offered a plea deal for some reason.
Sad: Stanton's right on the money with his advice here. And Viper1's is way off.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
This is curious. Because I thought the police are required to also obey speed limits? If he changed lanes into left lane and started accelerating above the speed limit which ended up cutting you off in a way, well isn't that speeding and careless on the cops end? If he had had lights on then it should be ok because the police is then trying to get to a emergency call etc..and you would see it most likely and be required to Yield. So does this mean that police can speed without having their lights on?
viper1 wrote:
You said you looked . So the lights could not have been on.
I have seen cops do that a lot (no lights race forward)
If the cop was not in an emergency situation the cop was careless.
Explore how to charge them.(the cop was in the wrong if no light's flashing)
Might want to get disclosier first .
Cheers
Viper1
Sad wrote:
the same time another car (2 cars behind of me), also changed line for passing, but he accelerated much faster and I blocked the line for him.
The worst part is it was police SUV. He pulled me over and I got ticket for 'Careless Driving, $400.
This is curious. Because I thought the police are required to also obey speed limits? If he changed lanes into left lane and started accelerating above the speed limit which ended up cutting you off in a way, well isn't that speeding and careless on the cops end? If he had had lights on then it should be ok because the police is then trying to get to a emergency call etc..and you would see it most likely and be required to Yield.
So does this mean that police can speed without having their lights on?
Hi so I have a bizzare situation. Today I received a summons for "being the owner of a motor vehicle bearing Vehicle Identification Number ###, failed to submit the vehicle, equipment or drawn vehicle for inspection or tests as required by an officer" for a vehicle I previously owned. Apparently a violation of HTA 82(9).
The date of offense is June 15, the summons was issued on October 26th and I…
Hi, I need some help for the ticket of lmproper left turn.
When i drove my car from east to west, intending to make a left turn and stop in front of stop line. There was a car in front of me, which has turn on yellow light. The light was turning red and then I thought I cannot leave in the intersection and turned, an incoming car was runing the light and hit me. No one got hurt but both cars had…
Have a ticket in which the radar used was a Genesis VP Directional. I had downloaded the manual for a Genesis VP but I now realize that the unit is not the same so it is the wrong manual. My trial is very soon so I do not have time to ask for disclosure of the manual.
Does anyone have access to an electronic version of the manual for Genesis VP Directional?
I was pulled over today in the city of Oakville for going 75 in a 40 zone. However, I am 100 percent certain that I was going only 50 in the 40 zone. When I was pulled over, I was driving my Dad's car which I felt was the reason I was getting stopped since two teenagers driving a 2013 S Class. He asked does I know why I am being pulled over and I…
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and didnt leave the up to date insurance paper on the car.
Hey question that I think here's probably the best place to get the answer:
I was charged with a careless driving offence in oct, trail in early april, so as of right now my insurance record is 100% clean... except the officer did file an accident report at the scene where I was classified at fault due to it being PI (although very minor). The person I hit did not sue etc, so the insurance company…
Very much unintentionally passed a stopped bus, with sign and flashing lights. Didn't realize I had done it until I was at the end of the bus. I'll save you my sob story, but it was truly accidental. I'm generally very cautious and have a perfect driving record. Never been stopped.
While I realize if a cop had seen me that I would have gotten a ticket, there were none in sight. Though I may very…
I was recently pulled over for running a red and I wasnt able to find my wallet in the car at the time to hand over my license. I had a passport in the vehicle that he used. The wallet was in the vehicle, it just fell through the seats. (Tough to find a black leather wallet in a black/black leather truck at night).
The officer still wrote the tickets for both he signed the one ticket (failure to…
I was passing a vehicle that was going slow for me and there was an oncoming vehicle coming at me. I speed up to get around the person I was passing and the oncoming vehicle turns out to be a cop who turns around and tickets me for going 110km in a 80km zone. How does it work with passing a vehicle? Once I passed the vehicle I went back down to my original speed of just under 100. The officer…
I picked up a brand new (old stock) Fuzzbuster a while ago at auction (wopping $5!!) and I want to mount it on the dash of my old GTO as a cool accessory when I show it at car shows. But I'm not sure if it's legal or not.
Here's my thoughts:
- It is early 70's technology (x-band) so it won't detect modern police radar. That's assuming no police force uses the old x-band frequency.
Hi guys, I'm still a little in shock of getting my first traffic ticket...
On Monday afternoon, I was returning from Toronto to Ottawa on HW416, I was driving about 15 over 100 like always. Then a car came very close to me on the left lane and made me nervous, I speed up unintentionally to pass the car and change lane, but while doing that a police car pull out of the median. He was hiding in…
May i ask this question regarding transport trucks limited to 105 km/h. Moving road blocks or safety?
IMO it isnt speed that kills. I find transport trucks infact help keep the road going. With cars that choose to not move to the right and slow down the middle lane the trucks would try to pass in their passing lane therefore the slower traffic would move right.
Received a notice from the police that a motion is being put forward to adjourn upcoming trial date. Notice indicates that an officer has sworn an affidavit that the crucial witness cannot attend date trial is set for (we know there is a social engagement at 7:30 pm for the witness, trial time is 1:30 pm). This further delay is a big problem to my daughter's case. She is moving away to…
This is what happened. I was travelling west on a four lane city street that was very light with traffic. I was making a left hand turn into a wide driveway of a business. There was traffic lights about 100 yards past the driveway and were red for the east-west traffic. I was in the left lane with my signal on and there was no oncoming traffic due to the red light. I was slowed right down…
I was driving my families older car and got pulled over, and the police officer informed me my plate was dirty. He issued me a ticket of $110 for the 13(2) act and obstruct plate as the offense. He informed me that such a plate could be used to avoid red lights as well as 407 tolls, also that buying a new plate can help to lower the ticket if I fight the charge, and that he also took a picture…
I received a red light camera ticket. In the picture, you see an ambulance in front of me with flashing lights. I had moved to alleviate the traffic behind me for the emergency vehicles coming behind it.
Is this a possible defense, if so, does anyone know any good case law to justify this position?
what happens if they charge someone for driving at 151Km/hr in montreal and they put for trial, appear after some months and sadly lost the trial ?
In montreal its $300 fine and 5demerit points ...
I heard Ontario and Qubec share the information. So once the trial is over ( and when the file moved to ontario) will his car gets towed and licence get suspended for 7days (later to 30 days ) ? and he…
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
This weekend my father was involved in an accident with a transit bus in Burlington, ON. After the police showed up he was charged with "Fail to obey stop sign" Sec. 136(1)(a). At this particular intersection there NO stop signs but there are traffic lights. There is construction going on there so one of the light posts is smaller.
Driving conditions were terribly wet and visibility was low.…
So my boyfriend and I recently started dating. I have a vehicle that was insured. Insurance cost too much and I found it was just as easy to walk to work due to how close it was. But I didn't want to get rid of my car just yet, plus I'm still making payments on it as well. When we moved into our appartment together, I had it towed to my parking spot out back.
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of street racing in the area. I was not charged on the scene for this but I'm scared i am going to be…
I got a ticket for failure to surrender insurance because I did not have my new insurance stubs with me, just a bunch of expired ones. My policy number has not changed, so I asked the officer to just run the policy number so I could prove that I was in fact insured. He said they don't have that ability, handed me the ticket and reminded me that my car could have been impounded.
So I'm in a bit of a pickle and would appreciate if someone could clarify something for me.
I'm less than a month away (test on April 6th) from getting my full G license, and got a speeding ticket recently. The ticket was for 49km/h over the posted limit of 100km/h on the 403 in Oakville/Halton region, but was reduced from the initial ~60km/h over.
