Hello, I was involved in a collision with an oncoming vehicle while making a left turn. A person from the other vehicle had minor injuries according to the paramedics on scene. My memory of the actual crash is very hazy (my doctor said it could happen due to a concussion and shock). I remember the light turning yellow before I entered the intersection, and then finding myself spinning around and stopping on the opposite sidewalk. To make things worse, in my dazed state I agreed to talk to the policeman, which led to me being charged with "careless driving" (the policeman said it was based on my and witnesses' statements), and I was given a summons to appear in court in a month. My question is: what are my options? Is it possible for me to fight this charge with any degree of success? Is it possible to reduce it to a less serious one? Please help. Thank you.
Hello,
I was involved in a collision with an oncoming vehicle while making a left turn. A person from the other vehicle had minor injuries according to the paramedics on scene.
My memory of the actual crash is very hazy (my doctor said it could happen due to a concussion and shock). I remember the light turning yellow before I entered the intersection, and then finding myself spinning around and stopping on the opposite sidewalk.
To make things worse, in my dazed state I agreed to talk to the policeman, which led to me being charged with "careless driving" (the policeman said it was based on my and witnesses' statements), and I was given a summons to appear in court in a month.
My question is: what are my options? Is it possible for me to fight this charge with any degree of success? Is it possible to reduce it to a less serious one?
A reminder that Careless driving is as bad as a DUI as far as insurance is concerned so you will want to fight this and try to (at best) get the charge dropped completely, or (at worst) at least reduced to a lesser charge that is not as serious for insurance purposes. The summons date is NOT your trial. You appear and you can make one of the following three decissions: (1) Just plead guilty (probably a bad idea) (2) If offered a plea deal to a reduced charge, ask if you can see disclosure before deciding and also say you want to seek legal advice about the reduced charge. Most likely they will agree and set another summons date for you to come back too. (3) If not offered a plea deal, ask if you can see disclosure before deciding and also say you want to seek legal advice. Most likely they will agree and set another summons date for you to come back too.
A reminder that Careless driving is as bad as a DUI as far as insurance is concerned so you will want to fight this and try to (at best) get the charge dropped completely, or (at worst) at least reduced to a lesser charge that is not as serious for insurance purposes.
The summons date is NOT your trial.
You appear and you can make one of the following three decissions:
(1) Just plead guilty (probably a bad idea)
(2) If offered a plea deal to a reduced charge, ask if you can see disclosure before deciding and also say you want to seek legal advice about the reduced charge. Most likely they will agree and set another summons date for you to come back too.
(3) If not offered a plea deal, ask if you can see disclosure before deciding and also say you want to seek legal advice. Most likely they will agree and set another summons date for you to come back too.
Thank you jsherk! A couple more questions if you don't mind: Is it possible for the prosecution to demand an answer on the spot, a sort of a "take it or leave it" deal? If I am offered a plea deal, do you know what kinds of a reduced charge are possible in this situation? And whether they will not have such a huge impact on my insurance? Thank you!
Thank you jsherk!
A couple more questions if you don't mind:
Is it possible for the prosecution to demand an answer on the spot, a sort of a "take it or leave it" deal?
If I am offered a plea deal, do you know what kinds of a reduced charge are possible in this situation? And whether they will not have such a huge impact on my insurance?
Yes they can tell you the deal is now or never, but I have not seen them do that. Usually they will still keep the deal available even after you have reviewed the disclosure.
Yes they can tell you the deal is now or never, but I have not seen them do that. Usually they will still keep the deal available even after you have reviewed the disclosure.
In my case the prosecutor initially offered me a "fail to stop for amber light" but when I told him that at "turn not in safety" was more appropriate, he was okay with that. So you can always suggest another charge and see if the prosecutor is agreeable to it, but no guarantees. Although he didn't say outright that there wouldn't be a deal next time, he did mention that this particular offer would probably not be made if I didn't accept it right away. Long story short, it never hurts to ask.
In my case the prosecutor initially offered me a "fail to stop for amber light" but when I told him that at "turn not in safety" was more appropriate, he was okay with that. So you can always suggest another charge and see if the prosecutor is agreeable to it, but no guarantees. Although he didn't say outright that there wouldn't be a deal next time, he did mention that this particular offer would probably not be made if I didn't accept it right away.
As pointed out by Jsherk, a Careless Driving offence is on par with an Impaired Driving or Over 80 conviction for insurance. It also carries a 6 demerit point penalty for your licence and possible other problems if you are a G1/G2 driver. Because your offence has been issued by summons, you are exposed to a greater range of penalty than had you been issued a simple ticket: "Careless driving 130. Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway and on conviction is liable to a fine of not less than $400 and not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both, and in addition his or her licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than two years. 2009, c. 5, s. 41." Generally for a case of this nature, you may be well served to seek out legal representation from a licenced and experienced paralegal.
As pointed out by Jsherk, a Careless Driving offence is on par with an Impaired Driving or Over 80 conviction for insurance. It also carries a 6 demerit point penalty for your licence and possible other problems if you are a G1/G2 driver. Because your offence has been issued by summons, you are exposed to a greater range of penalty than had you been issued a simple ticket:
"Careless driving
130. Every person is guilty of the offence of driving carelessly who drives a vehicle or street car on a highway without due care and attention or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway and on conviction is liable to a fine of not less than $400 and not more than $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both, and in addition his or her licence or permit may be suspended for a period of not more than two years. 2009, c. 5, s. 41."
Generally for a case of this nature, you may be well served to seek out legal representation from a licenced and experienced paralegal.
The content of this post is not legal advice. Legal advice can only be provided after a licenced paralegal has been retained, spoken with you directly, and reviewed the documents related to your case.
Thank you, but it raises more questions: Should I seek representation before the summons? Should I seek a paralegal or a lawyer? How would I find/choose a "licenced and experienced paralegal"? Can the forum members recommend one?
Thank you, but it raises more questions:
Should I seek representation before the summons?
Should I seek a paralegal or a lawyer?
How would I find/choose a "licenced and experienced paralegal"? Can the forum members recommend one?
The summons is NOT your trial date. Although you do have the option to plead guilty on the summons date, I would highly recommend that you do not do that. And I would suggest that you do not need any representation at the summons date. If you are offered a plea deal on this date, you can still make a request to see disclosure and get legal advice before you decide what you want to do, so they will set another date for you to come back. Same thing if they do not offer a plea deal, you can still make a request to see disclosure and get legal advice before you decide what you want to do, so they will set another date for you to come back.
The summons is NOT your trial date. Although you do have the option to plead guilty on the summons date, I would highly recommend that you do not do that.
And I would suggest that you do not need any representation at the summons date.
If you are offered a plea deal on this date, you can still make a request to see disclosure and get legal advice before you decide what you want to do, so they will set another date for you to come back. Same thing if they do not offer a plea deal, you can still make a request to see disclosure and get legal advice before you decide what you want to do, so they will set another date for you to come back.
This area of law is generally handled by paralegals. Hiring a lawyer may result in the lawyer's office managing the file and retaining a paralegal for the actual court work. Generally, you should make the decision whether to self-represent or to have legal representation before your first court appearance. Being unfamiliar with the law and court process, defendants tend to damage their case more than help it and that damage may limit what your legal representative can do for you if they are willing to take on the case partway through. If you are concerned about the reputation of a paralegal, you can use the paralegal lookup on the LSUC website to ensure that they are licenced and in good standing. You can also use Google to check for consumer reviews or complaints. Another insight would be to know how long they have been practicing specifically in HTA law.
ota17 wrote:
Thank you, but it raises more questions:
Should I seek representation before the summons?
Should I seek a paralegal or a lawyer?
How would I find/choose a "licenced and experienced paralegal"? Can the forum members recommend one?
This area of law is generally handled by paralegals. Hiring a lawyer may result in the lawyer's office managing the file and retaining a paralegal for the actual court work. Generally, you should make the decision whether to self-represent or to have legal representation before your first court appearance. Being unfamiliar with the law and court process, defendants tend to damage their case more than help it and that damage may limit what your legal representative can do for you if they are willing to take on the case partway through.
If you are concerned about the reputation of a paralegal, you can use the paralegal lookup on the LSUC website to ensure that they are licenced and in good standing. You can also use Google to check for consumer reviews or complaints. Another insight would be to know how long they have been practicing specifically in HTA law.
The content of this post is not legal advice. Legal advice can only be provided after a licenced paralegal has been retained, spoken with you directly, and reviewed the documents related to your case.
So heres my case, does it have any validity? Im argueing that the officer did not have a justified view of where and if my car stopped or not, which it did.
This is the officers view of the stop sign i "disobeyed"
Another possible viewpoint, just so i can say that he cant see regardless
As you can see he cannot see the line where i must stop
As close are possible (which he wasnt) to the intersection,…
I need some help to settle a "Right of Way" argument. I know this question has probably been asked a thousand times before, but after doing a search, I was unable to find a posting on the forum, or the specific section in the OHTA relating to it.
Scenario:
Two cars approach an intersection where the east and westbound directions are controlled by stop signs, and the north and southbound…
I was pulled over for doing 123 in an 80 zone on highway 7 near Peterborough. The officer reduced it to 109 in an 80. It was HIGHLY unlikely that I was going 109, let alone 123, so for the merit of it I am taking this to court. Court case mid January.
Please could you help me to decipher the officer's notes. Are there any errors in the notes or on the ticket that you can see?
Ive already done searches, read the act as best i can but still haven't read a complete answer. Where in the HTA does it state that the front license plate must be attached to the front bumper? I have it on the passenger sun visor (if ppl remember the old temp permits that taped to the pass side of windshield) i figured that this spot would be the same. However now they have got rid of…
Was pulled over earlier today for going 95km/h in posted 60km/h, 2nd offense (same cop that pulled me over the first time >.<) ticket of $265. going down dougall toward cabana where it goes from the 80 to 60 zone (yes was over slightly coming in and kept speed)
Just wondering what the best way to handle this? (location: windsor ontario)
I am a bartender and last saturday night while I was working someone backed into my car (2000 Acura Integra) in the prking lot. One of the cooks in the kitchen ran to tell me my car alarm is going off. Immediately I ran outside to discover my driver side mirror smashed on the ground and my driver door dented. There was nobody around to claim responsibility. I had already begun to suspect one…
Scenario regarding speeding charge - if a charge is not reduced at all at roadside, i.e. the charge, for example is "speeding 75 km/h in a 60 km/h zone contrary to s. 128," should that not mean the prosecution needs to prove that you are guilty of what you are being charged with, and not, simply, of speeding generally? I understand that if they prove a charge of even 61 km/h in a 60 km/h, they…
In a nutshell, in York Region, ran a stale yellow, cop was on a 407 off ramp and tickets me for red light. 2 week old pink slip, I forgot I put the new behind the expired one so I got a ticket for that as well.
Had the first court date adjourned because I did not receive disclosure. I used the Ticketcombat template and faxed it over, they told me I never left a phone number. No surprise there, I…
Was stopped in an OPP speed trap on eastbound QEW near Hamilton at 1:30 AM last week (Apr 25th). Officer said I was doing 131 km/h based on radar gun but I thought I was around 120 km/h (I let off the gas and looked at my speedo when I saw the 2 cars on the shoulder). It was a dark stretch and it was not busy but there were a few other cars on the highway. I asked to see the reading but they said…
1) Discovery info includes 3 pages of Genesis radar manual. Officer's notes show he used "Atlantic Laser" to measure speed. Didn't show model # (only s/n). The Genesis was used earlier on in the day, but not for my case. Can I grill him on this or is it simply a clerk's error in sending me the wrong manual?
I got a ticket for an expired licence sticker. The next day I went to the Ministry office to renew my sticker. I thought that I HAD to pay any outstanding tickets BEFORE I was eligible to renew my sticker. The lady at the desk informed me that I had an outstanding balance and 407 bill that I had a to pay and I told her that I was aware of that. I thought everything was cleared.
Last week I was driving though downtown and because of the slippery / wet conditions could not stop when the light was turning yellow to red and slid in to the intersection. I was hit by another car (near the headlamp). None of us were injured, there was significat damge to the cars. The air bags did not deploy.
I was given a ticket that reads : Red Light - fail to stop - H.T.A sect 144 (18) Fine…
I was just wondering if there was any text in the HTA that suggests that when driving on a highway with three lanes going in each direction, drivers should generally always be in the rightmost lane unless they are passing.
At first, I thought 154(b) was what I was looking for, but now I'm not so sure?
"Officials in West Vancouver, Canada apparently aren't satisfied with the driver-slowing properties of traditional speed bumps. Yesterday, the town unveiled a new way to entice motorists to ease off the gas pedal in the vicinity of the ÃÂcole Pauline Johnson Elementary School: A 2-D image of a child playing, creating the illusion that…
Does anybody know how you can check the status of your Demerit Points and how many you have collected over the last two years?
I just received a ticket as I was travelling through Barrie and am debating whether or not to fight it. My decision will be based on whether or not an infraction I received a year ago came with Demerit Points.
I have a question I would like to ask concerning turning right on a red light.
I was approaching on the right turn only lane to the traffic light which turned from amber to red. As soon as the red light came on, there were advance green left turn arrow for the intersection I was for the cars that were traveling right to left and left to right of me. Since there was a lot of traffic from where I…
So I got pulled over for speeding and following too close, on HWY 11 north of Barrie. The airplane caught me! I will fight this as I have fought ALL my tickets and won EVERY ONE of them (one per year... man I need to drive slower). So any thoughts out there on how to fight this one? Does the Crown have to bring the 2 officers in the plane, plus the one in the cruises to court? If 1 in 3 doesn't…
I am new to this forum and before making this post I did some digging and was unable to find anything on this method of officer note taking.
A little back ground of my case:
charged with 25km/h over the posted limit.
After numerous disclosure requests, finally received a detailed disclosure including several pages of the lidar manual and typed officer notes describing the events of my…
My wife was just pulled over for running a yellow light and instead was ticketed for an expired drivers licence. The license expired on her birthdate 4 months ago and she didn;t recieve a renewal. $325 !!!!!!
Hope someone can help. She was ticketed under HTA 32 (1) with the offense shown as
"Drive Motor Vehicle no license"
Can anyone tell me if this is worth the effort to get a reduction in the…
So I got pulled over for supposedly for running a stop sign. The problem is that I did a complete stop, waited a split second and started again. And yes I did stop behind the white line.
He took my information and went back to his car to write me up a ticket, came back and gave me my fine and explained to me the process. He gave me a reduced fine (65$ and ne points).
Someone has an accident in a car worth very little on highway 401 but the car is not drivable (but not in terrible shape), there is a police report filed right away in which no other cars were involved, however the car did strike a guardrail. Is it possible to handle this without involving insurance? Or is a forgone conclusion insurance will be notified by the police?
I made a minor mistake on my disclosure request - I put a "Request Date" of September 10, 2014 instead of 2015. The rest of the form is correct including offense date, fax date, trial date.
Will this affect my disclosure? Do I need to clear it up?
Also, I noticed the Ticket Combat disclosure form has a lot more information than what was posted in on this site. Is it OK to send a second…