Search found 37 matches

Speeding isn't section 120, it's section 128.

I'm confused, you were charged with Stunt Driving? So you were charged by way of a roadside issued summons? If I'm not mistaken an officers name isn't even on a roadside issued Summons, just a badge number at the bottom. Whereas a Part I ticket has the name right at the top.

Martin is the officers last name. You can see it at the top of your ticket, J. Martin and again on the Trial Notice, handwritten above the prosecutor check box.

rank wrote:BTW, The Stig, I replied to you by PM. Not sure if it went through or not. Still learning this message board format.

Your PM did not come through.

Rank;
That is Bloomfield isn't it?

Was going to pint out that there is a 'R' code in the code box indicating that it was 'R'educed at the roadside and that the notes indicate a clocked speed of 141km/h but you got ticket for 120km/h and that it's possible the prosecutor would seek to amend the ticket up to the full speed. But I also see that your court date was last Thursday so how ...

If you received a conditional discharge for dangerous operation you were in fact charged under the Criminal Code. Driving without an interlock in Ontario could in fact net you a Drive Disqualified charge or depending on your conditional discharge, reactivate that sentencing.

Not familiar with the administration side of it with Service Ontario but yes you can get a temp permit for a trailer. It gets displayed on the windshield of the towing vehicle.

You are not looking at s82 fully. The sections regarding notice (in the prescribed form) only apply to inspection requirements to the owner for reporting to another location after the fact. The driver (at the time of the stop) is required to follow the officer to any appropriate area and submit to tests.

Examination of vehicle

(2) Every police ...

buckha wrote:Thanks for the help guys. Sorry about posting this in the wrong section I was trying to figure out how to move it after i posted it but couldn't figure it out. And under sect i believe it says 32(2) it could very well be a messed up looking 37(2). Thanks again!

Could it be 31(2)?

You are misled a little. There is a general definition of off-road vehicle which includes many types of vehicles such as ATVs, Dirt Bikes, Argos, Side by Sides (aka UTVs) Dune Buggies etc. Regulation 316/03 permits specifically ATVs (a typical "quad") on designated roadways.

Tweed By-Law 2004-14 designates that it's roads are the type that ATVs ...

The extra copy is no big deal. My question is whether you typo'd the section wrong or not. Does it actually say 32(2)?

On the spot, no you wouldn't be issued the same numbers. If you are so attached to those numbers you can pay to convert those set of numbers to a personalized plate. As was mentioned you would then be issued a "loaner" plate while a new one was punched out in your numbers.

Not being familiar with the fire access roads it would come down to if they are considered a highway. If so you'd be looking at $110.

Section 2 of Regulation 316/03. You can look it up on E-laws if you like.

Perhaps your suspension was still "new" and had not yet become deemed served? Ie only a few days old and you had not yet been served personally or by mail. In that circumstance the licence would be seized but no charge laid.

Only way to know for sure is to track the officer down and ask them. But I suspect you don't want to push your luck.

The officer MUST serve the driver with a notice form pursuant to s. 82(6) before the driver can be charged with failing/refusing to comply with any directions under s. 82 related to moving the vehicle or assisting in the examination. The approved form is the Vehicle Defect Report Notice.
Negative on the driver part Simon. The notice in the ...

Joey wrote:... The HTA governs us all every day and it wasn't until I started reading it that I realized just how easily your rights to drive can be revoked.

Just wanted to point out that driving is not a right. It is a privilege.

Max fine for an Unauthorized Plate conviction if $1000. Likely less than that unless a history. Is there a no insurance charge possibly out there too?

the mandatory 6-month suspension will put me out of business and out of work

What mandatory 6-month suspension?
HTA Section 53
Licence suspended

(3) The drivers licence of a person who is convicted of an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1) is thereupon suspended for a period of six months in addition to any other period for which the licence ...

For Pete's sake STOP DRIVING. I can't imagine that you haven't spent a period in Jail for this already. Here a 10th drive suspend would net you between 6months and a year in jail.

You are fine to operate a boat. Only time you wouldn't be is if you were charged with a criminal (boating) offence ie Impaired, Dangerous Boating etc and you were issued a boating prohibition.

Reflections wrote:1.7 KM distance?????? Does the Laser Atlanta have that as a working range?<----------- Find out

Found, Laser Atlanta Speed Laser "S" and "R"

http://www.davtech.ca/uploads/Speedlaser%20R.pdf

2.133 km.....wow......

I've seen a Laser Atlanta pick up a target as far out as 4.7km

I think its stating that its Laser Atlanta serial number 22347 I'm guessing T/D is tested device M/S is myself W/O is ? at 0610 Station, 0847 at Setup and 1215 at takedown. Looks like 3 times noted. Most of the other shortforms I can make out but a few are unknown.

You may want to ask for a deciphered interpretation of the notes.

I suspect that the interlock condition has since passed. If after your your driving prohibition expired you wished to drive in Ontario you would have needed to have the interlock installed. You can essentially opt not to drive (In Ont) for that period and it would pass.

As far as the remedial (Back on Track) program. Don't think of it so much that ...

Please do not mislead the public.

Fine then, don't believe me. I don't really care. Or better yet call Decatur themselves. They are in this town called Decatur Illinois.

Radar;

The changes I referred to were respect to manual changes, not cases. The radar has to be operated as per the manufacturers instructions/manual. And yes I agree that ...

First off thats not a Canadian Manual.

Second since Jan 2010 Police don't have to estimate the speed, just observe a vehicle in excess of speed limit.

Third since Aug 2010 that entire tracking history section is removed from manual.

Fourth, don't be surprised if original 88 in 60 speed is amended in court.

Good luck.

The Trucker wrote: Do you have a link to those by-laws

Missisauga By-Law 555-00

Enjoy

I know it seems small scale to you. However you park there for a couple of minutes and the next car parks there for a couple of minutes, so on and so on. It can easily add up to someone parking there for half a day in total.

Quite honestly if I can drive around for a minute or two and find a spot to park to use the bank machine then so can you ...

Also can I win if the officer is parked illegally

No.

The Mississauga Parking By-Law (555-00) exempts Police vehicles.

EXEMPTIONS
44. The provisions of sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 , 18, 19, 20, 21, 26 and 32
of this By-law do not apply to ambulances, police or fire department vehicles, or public emergency vehicles ...

Vin;

The ticket as completed is the charging document. Whatever it says, is the charge that is/was before the court. The wording on the notice you got (after it went 9.1 fail to respond conviction) likely is just a short form drop down style of selection on the computer when filling in the notice. Don't be too concerned with the exact wording used ...