Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive. I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking limit on the opposite side of the street. While I do have a monthly parking spot a couple of blocks away, here is the scenario: I am often sent out of the office for 10 mins to up to a few hours to pick up materials, drawings, etc, etc. As a result, I park my car in the 2 hour parking in order to off-load, etc. Sometimes I make several trips throughout the day. I am being issued tickets because at say 9:47am the parking police have noted my plate # and photographed my license plate. A few hours later (say 12:30pm) they have done the same "walk" and ticketed any vehicles that are parked on the side of the street which were noted as being there at 9:47am. Now, during the time from 9:47am to 12:30pm I could have left the office and returned a dozen times....however, I have not been in the parking spot for 2 hours - they are "assuming" I have been because my car was there at both those time periods. Exactly how can the City prove that the car has been there more than the two hour limit simply by documenting a time and plate number? I mean, unless they actually WATCH the car for two hours they can't 100% state that it was actually parked two hours. And in my case, I may be parked two hours THROUGHOUT the day, however, my car is rarely there for more than 30mins to 60mins depending on off-load time, etc etc etc. Across the street the construction workers are parking trucks anywhere and everywhere. On sidewalks, half hanging off sidewalks, motorcycles are even being parked on the property between the window and the sidewalks. Some of the motorcycles being parked there don't even belong to anyone on site, but rather other workers throughout the core as they have noticed the "free parking" available for those that drive two wheels. As the city has closed this sidewalk for construction, parking people tell me that this situation is fine - the road itself has not been closed. I've discussed the situation with parking authorities to no avail. I have attempted to challenge the tickets in court, but the city returned them stating that I hadn't filed the challenge in time. All the parking authorities did was advise me to get a monthly spot - which I already have - but I find it unreasonable and ridiculous to have to constantly walk 3 blocks to and from my car with materials, etc - again I've told this to the parking authorities. So, how do these municipalities defend the tickets issued when there is no definitive proof?
Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive.
I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking limit on the opposite side of the street.
While I do have a monthly parking spot a couple of blocks away, here is the scenario:
I am often sent out of the office for 10 mins to up to a few hours to pick up materials, drawings, etc, etc. As a result, I park my car in the 2 hour parking in order to off-load, etc. Sometimes I make several trips throughout the day.
I am being issued tickets because at say 9:47am the parking police have noted my plate # and photographed my license plate. A few hours later (say 12:30pm) they have done the same "walk" and ticketed any vehicles that are parked on the side of the street which were noted as being there at 9:47am.
Now, during the time from 9:47am to 12:30pm I could have left the office and returned a dozen times....however, I have not been in the parking spot for 2 hours - they are "assuming" I have been because my car was there at both those time periods.
Exactly how can the City prove that the car has been there more than the two hour limit simply by documenting a time and plate number? I mean, unless they actually WATCH the car for two hours they can't 100% state that it was actually parked two hours. And in my case, I may be parked two hours THROUGHOUT the day, however, my car is rarely there for more than 30mins to 60mins depending on off-load time, etc etc etc.
Across the street the construction workers are parking trucks anywhere and everywhere. On sidewalks, half hanging off sidewalks, motorcycles are even being parked on the property between the window and the sidewalks. Some of the motorcycles being parked there don't even belong to anyone on site, but rather other workers throughout the core as they have noticed the "free parking" available for those that drive two wheels. As the city has closed this sidewalk for construction, parking people tell me that this situation is fine - the road itself has not been closed.
I've discussed the situation with parking authorities to no avail. I have attempted to challenge the tickets in court, but the city returned them stating that I hadn't filed the challenge in time. All the parking authorities did was advise me to get a monthly spot - which I already have - but I find it unreasonable and ridiculous to have to constantly walk 3 blocks to and from my car with materials, etc - again I've told this to the parking authorities.
So, how do these municipalities defend the tickets issued when there is no definitive proof?
Youd have to check the actual bylaw section that you were charged under. Im not familiar with Kitcheners, but some city bylaws state not to park or repark within a period of X hours, so they cover vehicles that may leave and return. If not, you could probably successfully fight the ticket in Court. Of course whether its worth spending a day in Court over is another matter.
Youd have to check the actual bylaw section that you were charged under. Im not familiar with Kitcheners, but some city bylaws state not to park or repark within a period of X hours, so they cover vehicles that may leave and return.
If not, you could probably successfully fight the ticket in Court. Of course whether its worth spending a day in Court over is another matter.
But again - how do they prove that the vehicle has been continuously parked for any stretch of time? No reparking bylaw exists, however, it doesn't change the fact that because a car is here now and 2 hours from now doesn't mean it was there the whole 2 hours?
But again - how do they prove that the vehicle has been continuously parked for any stretch of time? No reparking bylaw exists, however, it doesn't change the fact that because a car is here now and 2 hours from now doesn't mean it was there the whole 2 hours?
They cant say with absolute certainty, but that isnt the standard required for Court. They could probably articulate reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle was there for the entire time, based on seeing it in the same location at two separate times. Its unfortunate in your case if that isnt what happened, but I dont see any way to dispute it other than going to Court. Edit: A quick look at the City's bylaw page does show reparking regulations, but I don't know if they'd apply in the area where you were charged.
They cant say with absolute certainty, but that isnt the standard required for Court. They could probably articulate reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle was there for the entire time, based on seeing it in the same location at two separate times. Its unfortunate in your case if that isnt what happened, but I dont see any way to dispute it other than going to Court.
Edit: A quick look at the City's bylaw page does show reparking regulations, but I don't know if they'd apply in the area where you were charged.
There is a good chance they have marked your tire with chalk. That is what they do here and it is accepted practice. The chalk mark is usually on the tread and is hard to see if you are not looking for it. It is not something you will just notice. OPS
There is a good chance they have marked your tire with chalk. That is what they do here and it is accepted practice. The chalk mark is usually on the tread and is hard to see if you are not looking for it. It is not something you will just notice.
Actually, the OP said they photographed his vehicle. Many municipalities now have handheld electronic ticketing machines. They enter the plate into the device, photograph the vehicle and it prints out a ticket. The devices also store when/where the plate was last entered to determine if the vehicle is over the limit.
Actually, the OP said they photographed his vehicle. Many municipalities now have handheld electronic ticketing machines. They enter the plate into the device, photograph the vehicle and it prints out a ticket. The devices also store when/where the plate was last entered to determine if the vehicle is over the limit.
I know the photograph does not prove the vehicle has not been moved in the last two or three hours. I am guessing that there was a chalk mark used as well. Only full disclosure will tell, Or a court challenge. OPS
I know the photograph does not prove the vehicle has not been moved in the last two or three hours. I am guessing that there was a chalk mark used as well.
Only full disclosure will tell, Or a court challenge.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…