Search found 2576 matches

G1... G2 - good for max 5yrs.....those instances might be where it expires other than on a birthday (pending when the person actually passed the licence).....but in those times, most people are on the game and want to advance their licence and known the expiry. Once a G it is supposed to be readjusted to the birthday. After that they are all on the ...

You may have the GPS screen visible to you if you are not holding it (e.g., mounted somewhere). If possible, don't mount it on your windshield - it's rare, but you could get a "windshield obstructed" ticket.

rare is an understatement...only hear of that offence once/twice a year, where someone clears an 3" scrape through ice/snow on the ...

just to add in another twist...
142
Signal for stop
( 8 ) The driver or operator of a vehicle upon a highway before stopping or suddenly decreasing the speed of the vehicle, if the operation of any other vehicle may be affected by such stopping or decreasing of speed, shall give a signal plainly visible to the driver or operator of the other ...

Reflections wrote:

hwybear wrote:

Reflections wrote:
Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

does not make a difference.......speedo is checked 2 plus times each SHIFT.

You might check it twice and have documentation to prove it. But not every officer does.

yes they do...at least in my office. and it is a minimum of twice a shift!

Reflections wrote:

hwybear wrote:i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

does not make a difference.......speedo is checked 2 plus times each SHIFT.

i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

PbFoot - there was no court during this story......don't know where that is coming from

Oobie wrote:I've read the link over and I understand it as it is okay to park on the shoulder of the 401 except in indicated areas. My father reads it the opposite way. Which one of us is correct ?

I do not have much to do with this in our area, but reading it.... I interpret that a person "CAN park on the shoulder, except for indicated areas".

Suspension has "never happened" as a result of lower charge. When you are filling out an insurance app, you can state that your license has never been suspended.

Suspension has happened, if the person so chooses to plea to something else or even beat the offence so be it.

Might want to error on the side of caution and go to the MTO and have ...

Reflections wrote:down because the guns are only accurate to plus/minus 2 KMH.

not all lidar/radar are the same....FYI

Speed is a factor...at 0km/hr he would not have been moving to hit anyone..

Perhaps calling the court might help clear out the issue. If the license was suspended due to an additional fee that was not billed at the same charge, then the set fine is incorrect. There are precedents where the wrong fines have resulted in tickets being quashed.

it has nothing to do with the fines.....they were late in paying the initial ...

myticket wrote:Now can anyone help me if I can appeal based on the ground that the charge i was convicted did not prove.
.

obviously the JP thought the officer provided enough evidence for the conviction. You now need to convince the next level of court, how this JP errored in the law to grant an appeal.

Suspended wrote:There where 2 of us who both got $200.00 fines and reductions to driving with an invalid licence. One guy got $1,000.00 fine and a further 6 month's suspension.

might be b/c the "one guy" had priors. I most recently convicted a driver for his 10th time and he received $2000 fine, 6 month suspension and 30 days in jail.

yes, can be brought back up to original speed.

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1393.html

You differentiate between routine patrol and traffic enforcement. I'm not an officer, obviously, so I assume you mean routine patrol versus blitzes and going out onto the roads specifically to catch people in the act.
By routine, I mean patrolling town, cities neighbourhoods. By traffic enforcement, I mean officers dedicated solely to traffic ...

HTA 32(1).

Wow that is a deal and a half!! Usually Drive no licence set fine is $265 plus surcharge.

Radar Identified wrote:Lower court not bound by an appeal court?

I thought they were... .

that was always my impression too....where is TC or Ottlegal????

HTA sec 1 definition of roadway...does NOT include the shoulder

Here is the regulation to look at....plus it adds in areas affected.

HTA OREG 604
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0604_e.htm

HatinTO wrote:just found out, you only have to move a couple of meters. now to prove that i moved it.

if found on the web, can you give us the link for future

I think having as much police presence on the road as we can afford is a good thing. However, marking a cruiser to look like a cab is underhanded and done only to generate revenue for the region it's in. .

For general patrol vehicles, I completely agree.

For traffic enforcement I disagree. I would like to see a majority of units doing traffic ...

byttr - your new thread of same incident deleted...question copied to here

If after a trial you are handed a further suspension (ie 30 day suspension) - is it in effect immediately (or the day after)? Just wondering if i should drive to court tomorrow as a further suspension is likely...

thanks in advance

Suspension Effective immediately ...

viper1 wrote:[The only time that there is no effect on your insurance (rates) is when you are out of the car or when something hits you from the air.
Viper1

just blame RI for that

copied to more appropriate thread....

Recently I got a ticket for not wearing a seat belt at passenger's seat. I was told that I would get 2 points for it but I checked your website and it said there that there are no points for such offence. Please clarify which is correct.
ygauberg@rogers.com




Sounds like a Section 154 offence which carries ...

lucky777 wrote:So that does not mean I am charged with 3 counts of driving under suspension? or does it?

if you received 3 different summons with the same offence, I would say 3 charges, one for each suspension

24 over = 3 demerit points gained


just an FYI

Hand-held devices prohibited

Wireless communication devices

78.1 (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless communication device or other prescribed device that is capable of receiving or transmitting telephone communications, electronic data ...

watched "parking wars" the PPA (Philadelphia Parking Authority) showed this....scenario. Vehicle could only park for that 1hr limit on that side of the street, then would have to park on the opposite side for the next hour....after that the vehicle could not longer be parked on that section of the street in either direction.

should consult your ...

If there is a collision report completed, it will eventually get to the MTO and added onto the drivers licence.

When insurance checks the licence, they will see the collision.

Would not want to say no collisions if asked, as that might be a reason to cancel your insurance for a false statement.

Radar Identified wrote:As I drive through that area on the 401 every 2-3 months, I've come up with a solution: Look at the photograph, and memorize the licence plate. .

Wondering if you are that close.... is it too late

. Officer told me that there is a sign that you cannot go straight and I am sure he was referring the word "only".

The arrow signs by themselves require the driver to turn "only" in a particular direction.

The word "only" added underneath the 2 arrows is probably put up to remind drivers, but is not a required sign or legislated sign that I ...