Search found 1367 matches

So the car guys that recommend letting off the gas gently then applying the brakes, are telling you to break the law.......will wonders never cease in Ontario......

You order the transcripts when you file the appeal......

i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

does not make a difference.......speedo is checked 2 plus times each SHIFT.

You might check it twice and have documentation to ...

Squishy wrote:I gear down to slow

From rabbit to turtle?? Squish, get that lawn tractor off the street...

I've made several attempts to obtain this information but received no response, nothing that tells me that I can view this document at the court house. No explanation, nothing.

Improper disclosure, dismiss the charge.............They have to allow you access to the manual........

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=speed+timing ...

Thanks for the explanation :)

I'd like to use this argument in court, however since I don't have any official documentation stating that this particular radar.. when in POP mode, the constable cannot issue a speeding ticket to anyone.

How should I go about that? I've even gone as far as requesting a copy of the operating manual from the ...

hwybear wrote:i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

hwybear wrote:

Reflections wrote:down because the guns are only accurate to plus/minus 2 KMH.

not all lidar/radar are the same....FYI

The LTI guns have the same accuracy........

http://www.lasertech.com/content/pdfs/U ... R_Spec.pdf

racer wrote:I guess he did not know about "How to avoid an accident? - By being too s***faced to find my keys!"

Always a good choice........

racer wrote:The worst thing you did was telling him you drove. You should have kept telling him that you didn't drive the car.

Of course if this goes to court the OP could argue he said it because the officer was badgering him.....trying to get a quick end to it...sort of idea.

tonygambini wrote:Well that sucks!

Not too sure what I have to go on anymore....

any ideas?

You could still poke around the testing times.....other then that???????? Was it wet at the time?

Generally they have to mark your car (usually by chalking the tires with a line on the side from the top of the tire to the rim) first and then come back an hour (or whatever the limit is) later to verify that you have over-stayed (theoretically you could move to another spot far from where you originally were and if the chalk line ends up at the ...

I think there was a recent decision that said as long as the tests were completed and found no errors then the court shall accept the readings.

And 71 m is pretty close and the beam is small so an arguement of outside influence wouldn't fly.

As far as I also find this weird because the ticket was a R87 ticket.
the officer rounded his reading ...

0724/0708

Those are probably serial numbers on the units. Is there a distance?

tonygambini wrote:Yes there is a make/model.

It says he was using 2 types (but only nailed me on one)

Rader (not used for me): Stalker

Laser: Ultralite LRB LTI 20-20

[/u]

Is there anything in his notes about an alignment check?

Moved to proper location

I got a court date tomorrow and I was charged with driving with suspended licenses. The vehicle was parked in a parking lot in a parking spot. I was in the passenger seat with the vehicle running cause it was cold outside(the month was jan when it happend). The officer (York Region Police) pulled in and asked for info but I didnt have any, so I ...

So the court date was today:

The prosecution called me up right away, they asked for an adjournment of the trial (one month) so they can get together my "larger than normal request for disclosure".

The JP asked if I had anything to day: I didn't know that they were going to do this so I was kind of baffled. I just asked for the case to be ...

How about those who speed to get in front of you when you are the last car in the long line of moving vehicles, only to slam on the breaks because they were going faster than your lane and are about to brownnose the car ahead?

That was lane crashing.........

Or those idiots who, seeing your signal to enter their lane, speed UP in order to ...

diehard wrote:Thanks Reflections.

What if the trial date is a few days after I receive the notification by mail?

The disclosure request can take up to 8 weeks, right?

Cheers.

You can ask for an adjournment due to lack of disclosure........

Lane crashing------------@#%$#%#$@^#^%#%^ drivers.

Actually that looks like Toronto driving................................wait the roads are smoother.......

http://www.ticketcombat.com/step4/precedents.php

Read on......

So now we will waste more court time later with an appeal??? Makes sense to me.

This charge is only applicable to those driving on the highway, not off of it. If your son was not on the road, he is not governed by the OHTA, unless the ditch has been deemed part of the road, you will have to look that up. This is a serious charge and you may want to consult professional help.

people that would complain are the ones that get caught....b/c "I would not have done that IF I seen a marked police car" :roll:

You've got point their. Put come on, the cops already have undercover cars, do they really need these Taxi Cab look-alike? The game would be unfair, how can i possibly enjoy the sports car if every Ford Crown Vic i see ...

See here:http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1567.html

Nathan477 wrote:So does anybody know anything about actually going to court? Is there a better forum here for actual proceedings and information about pleading your case, do I have to call myself as a witness? How do I give something to the judge?

For this charge, get legal help. You will save in the long run.........

hwybear wrote:people that would complain are the ones that get caught....b/c "I would not have done that IF I seen a marked police car"

Well, yeah.........


The theory was good, execution was lacking.......