Ontario Highway Traffic Act

So the car guys that recommend letting off the gas gently then applying the brakes, are telling you to break the law.......will wonders never cease in Ontario......

You order the transcripts when you file the appeal......

i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

does not make a difference.......speedo is checked 2 plus times each SHIFT.

You might check it twice and have documentation to ...

Squishy wrote:I gear down to slow

From rabbit to turtle?? Squish, get that lawn tractor off the street...

I've made several attempts to obtain this information but received no response, nothing that tells me that I can view this document at the court house. No explanation, nothing.

Improper disclosure, dismiss the charge.............They have to allow you access to the manual........

http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=speed+timing ...

Thanks for the explanation :)

I'd like to use this argument in court, however since I don't have any official documentation stating that this particular radar.. when in POP mode, the constable cannot issue a speeding ticket to anyone.

How should I go about that? I've even gone as far as requesting a copy of the operating manual from the ...

hwybear wrote:i pace quite often to avoid radar detectors, does not matter what cruiser I'm in, speedo is always good to go as it's always checked at least twice a day!

Is the speedo checked after a summer to winter tire change???

hwybear wrote:

Reflections wrote:down because the guns are only accurate to plus/minus 2 KMH.

not all lidar/radar are the same....FYI

The LTI guns have the same accuracy........

http://www.lasertech.com/content/pdfs/U ... R_Spec.pdf

racer wrote:I guess he did not know about "How to avoid an accident? - By being too s***faced to find my keys!"

Always a good choice........

racer wrote:The worst thing you did was telling him you drove. You should have kept telling him that you didn't drive the car.

Of course if this goes to court the OP could argue he said it because the officer was badgering him.....trying to get a quick end to it...sort of idea.

tonygambini wrote:Well that sucks!

Not too sure what I have to go on anymore....

any ideas?

You could still poke around the testing times.....other then that???????? Was it wet at the time?

Generally they have to mark your car (usually by chalking the tires with a line on the side from the top of the tire to the rim) first and then come back an hour (or whatever the limit is) later to verify that you have over-stayed (theoretically you could move to another spot far from where you originally were and if the chalk line ends up at the ...

I think there was a recent decision that said as long as the tests were completed and found no errors then the court shall accept the readings.

And 71 m is pretty close and the beam is small so an arguement of outside influence wouldn't fly.

As far as I also find this weird because the ticket was a R87 ticket.
the officer rounded his reading ...

0724/0708

Those are probably serial numbers on the units. Is there a distance?

tonygambini wrote:Yes there is a make/model.

It says he was using 2 types (but only nailed me on one)

Rader (not used for me): Stalker

Laser: Ultralite LRB LTI 20-20

[/u]

Is there anything in his notes about an alignment check?