Search found 1367 matches

Is he required to give me the manuals? He said he would identify the equipment.

--The officers notes should identify what was used. And the only thing required is that you have access to the manuals, not manuals of your own.

I have photographs (taken by me) of the hill and the spot where the officer was hiding. Also with views from the hiding ...

Go down to the MTO and show them the recipits. Sounds like an error on their end.

If what the officer said was true, all vehicles with blind spots would fall into this catagory........ wait all vehicles have blind spots....... everyone park you cars and walk to work.

The unit cannot be user calibrated.

That is done when assembled.

In my 22 years using various radar devices, whether an officer can articulate or not, these instruments are extremely reliable and I never get readings that don't coincide with my observations.

I have read some LIDAR manuals and they actually reroute some of the light emmision ...

Required testing is an internal test that also performs a sort of self-cal. You have the ability to call into question the 122 as the manufacturer states quite clearly in the manual that the reading is plus/minus 3 KMH. And your 3 KMH would put you in a lower $$ bracket.

3 years

Is this disclosure request form ok?

http://respect.to/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=LegalInfo.RequestForDisclosureForm

As for the 4F template, that's when I submit a request for stay of charges (11(b)), at least two weeks before the trial date, right?

Thanks!
As for the disclosure form, looks fine to me. I would just - in addition to your general request ...

You can search or goto a paralegal to draft your File form 4F, "Notice of Constituional Question" I believe it is. Your choice.

Type your own request and get the transmission confirmation. Ask for everything you asked for before. Don't worry about format. Try for a formal "feel" though.

But why should I request the disclosure again since I already requested once and I also did a follow up call to their office? I think since I already made many attempts for the disclosure, would it be worth it to request again? or just mention to the judge it's their fault by not providing it to me?

This is traffic court, you have a certain ...

should I request another disclosure for the Oct trail ?( which is the third trail now)

Request again. Are you using registered mail or faxing?

Please don't post the same topic twice. Follow this topic in "Exceed speed limit 30 to 49 KMH".

Locked.

you can find a sample at www.ticketcombat.com

So, if i can get a minimum lead time (how much time does it take to measure both approaching car's speeds, verify the radar patrol speed read-out vs the patrol speedo, etc) then I can calculate the distance the initial sighting took place.

Takes about a second, if less.

See if you can find the manual online, it will detail everything.

The ...

Pacing is quite common, which he probably used.........Search on here for posts and question regarding this.

10 days is not a lot. You want to ask for is a continuance, time to look over the evidence, since during your 10 days you also have to work and sleep...etc. You should get it.

When you go to court make sure you have the fax confirmations with you. If you are handed your disclosure immediately before the trial, wait your turn and ask the JP for a stay due to lack of disclosure. It probably won't happen but you will mostly get a continuance to look over the documents. This could be weeks or months, depends on where you are ...

Should I pay the fine? If so, why? What will be the consequences?
If not, why?

Pay the fine or fight the charge it's up to you. Question is can you prove you were not going 127 in a 90. 15 over isn't that bad....again it's up to you.

Again, you can find this in the manual as well.

And bump for an update.

Going by your story, you should be able to go back to that intersection and take some pics or video next time it is raining.

Due to the seriousness of the charge though, legal representation would be advisable.

Lidar does have it's faults but you will need to read the manual to find out what they are.

My Details:
24 years old.
Driving for 10 years.

You started driving when you were 14?

Send that in and see what you get. You may have to send it twice, registered mail or fax with transmission record will do. Then you wait. Do you have a court date yet?

The device on the tripod was most likely lidar.

In your disclosure you may want to ask for both officer's notes, testing notes including alignment checks, and a copy of the users manual for the speed detection device used.

Personal opinion: Pay it and thank the officer, might I suggest a donut?

Bring your phone records to court, your friend too if possible. Case dismissed.

Research S.159 and look for the definition of "Emergency Vehicle" and the conditions for "moving over".

Sorry to disappoint, but it is challenged on a weekly basis in POA courts in Toronto. Unless you have an expert witness who can testify that the tests conducted by police are not sufficient to prove the device was working correctly, you're in a major uphill battle, IMO.

X2

Yup gifts are possible but they have limits. Check with MTO.