Search found 65 matches

Officer is not required to show you the speed measuring device anyway, doing so would be a courtesy. His testimony that the device indicated X speed is adequate.

Right back atcha!

Do some due diligence as well, you can check the online public portal of CPIC to check if an object has been reported stolen by it's serial number;

http://app.cpic-cipc.ca/English/searchformproperty.cfm

Just exercise caution when buying from less reputable sources, not just because the item may have a checkered past, but because its condition may ...

You committed a series of offences. You were charged and eventually plead guilty to one of them. Your driving record now reflects your cavalier attitude towards your responsibilities as a driver.

You can drive, you will just have to pay more for the privilege. As a consequence MAYBE you will be more careful.

You are not being persecuted. You are ...

I think you're also making an assumption that the officer does not have the property owners consent.

Has already been answered but the fundamental categories are Peace Officers (Criminal Code 495) and Citizens (Criminal Code 494) powers of arrest. the biggest difference is that a citizen must witness a criminal act (generally indictable) whereas a Peace Officer can arrest for RPG (reasonable and probable grounds). I'd encourage you to exercise ...

jsherk wrote:NEVER volunteer any of this information.
Always wait to be asked for it.
Always asked if you are required to give them the information.
Always say that any information you give them is not voluntary.

This should make every interaction awkward and lengthy. Good advice.

t3ch9 wrote:If you think I'm incorrect with this statement, keep it to yourself. I've seen enough police officers to know that there is bare police corruption going on.

Your comments are off topic and bring nothing to this discussion. I think it's you who might be well advised to keep it to yourself.

t3ch9 wrote:Some officers just like to get rid of tickets. I don't know what this country is turning into.

Some drivers have trouble mastering basic proficiency behind the wheel as well.

Fail to surrender licence, fail to surrender vehicle permit (HTA) and fail to have/surrender insurance card (CAIA) at a minimum.... Of course this assumes that the driver merely fails to produce his DL and doesn't refuse to identify himself when asked.

Obviously more charges would apply if additional problems were identified in the subsequent ...

Thanks for the feedback. Do insurance companies take consideration the demerit points or the offense? I'm planning on getting a car for work soon and I want to know what I should prepare when going to see a broker or speaking to an insurance company.

Your insurance company does not care about points (these are used by the MTO) just minor and ...

https://www.ontario.ca/page/understandi ... rit-points

This link answers your questions 3 and 4.

As a G2 driver you face additional consequences for some matters. Demerit points do not stay on your record forever - they disappear after two years. So at present you have no points.

Charges under the LLA don't appear on your drivers abstract.

jsherk wrote:Anyways the police have up to 6 months from the date of the offence to charge you, so no point worrying about it for that long.

Not for Dangerous Operation. It's a criminal charge, no time limit like you suggest.

250alp wrote:Starting to think the purpose of this bulletin board is support more government intervention to drive business for Paralegals and Lawyers?
Who funds this site?

Uh yeah, anyone disagreeing with you must be shilling for the man.

Clearly some just don't see red light cameras as the Orwellian threat to free society that you do.

It's obvious to me, that the real reason there was no replies to "infallible" is because folks are worried about giving up trade secrets or getting in trouble at work or some such thing. And that's fine. Helping by critiquing defenses, but not helping as much as they could. Again.....not that there's anything wrong with that. It's better than a ...

250alp wrote:London Councillor just asked about RH turn red lights, "YES you will get a $325 ticket unless you make a full stop".

So, if you break the law you risk a ticket? Not sure I'm seeing how this penalizes safe drivers.

You don't see a problem in this country when exercising your legal rights becomes "foolish and complicates matters"?
You don't see a problem in this country when the police are allowed to lie/deceive you when questioning you, but if you lie to them you can be charged?
You don't see a problem in this country when the police using the law to charge ...

I don't think a criminal charge and a minor traffic matter are analagous.

I find the whole "I don't have to talk to you" attitude of some people as akin to teenage angst and thumbing their nose at authority. The danger in advising people to exercise their rights in this manner is that if they do not understand what they are REQUIRED to do they ...

OPS Copper wrote:You won't talk yourself out of a ticket in most cases. However you will talk yourself into one.

THIS.

Not sure precisely what you mean about different levels of suspicion.

Reasonable grounds ("A set of facts or circumstances which would satisfy an ordinary cautious and prudent person that there is reason to believe and which goes beyond mere suspicion") is the basis for most charges, but a "reasonable suspicion" articulated by an Officer could ...

It was my understanding that endorsement 43 was only available in the case of new cars when they are purchased, as stated under "conditions" of the OPCF43 form;

3. Limitations on Your Coverage
The following conditions apply:
You must be the original purchaser and the automobile must be new at the time of delivery; and
The loss or damage must ...

Speak to a lawyer. Right away.

From my own perspective I would counsel MY daughter to report the accident immediately and to take responsibility for her mistake. Reporting the accident BEFORE someone knocks on the door undermines the key element of the criminal fail to remain charge (attempting to avoid civil or criminal responsibility).

She can ...

Not to get "preachy" but I'm assuming that your daughter was at fault in this collision, hence the lack of concern with the damage that was done to your vehicle.

I'd exercise caution here and speak with a lawyer immediately. Your vehicle was involved in a collision, your daughter may have committed a criminal offence and your simply refusing to ...

I have both our cars kitted out with "rearview mirror" style dashcam;

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/NEW-HD-1080P-Dash-Cam-Video-Recorder-Rearview-Mirror-Car-Camera-Vehicle-DVR-/151257958888
(Link provided as an example - not recommending this device or seller specifically)

One version we use is purely a front facing camera, the second actually has a ...

Your description of the accident itself is unclear, and makes it hard to offer an opinion on the circumstances themselves.

Adjusters can (and do) consider whether or not the damage to vehicles involved in an accident are consistent with the participants description, but this is not the same as any sort of forensic analysis. It might tip the ...

Knowing your rights is excellent - it's personally been my experience that those who yell "I know my rights" the loudest usually do not.

Why would you NOT open your window? The officer is looking for impaired drivers, the sooner you answer his basic questions you're on your way, this dogmatic defence of some perceived protection from ANY invasion ...

Impaired? Had you been.

An officer may stop any vehicle at any time to check for sobriety, licencing, insurance or the mechanical condition of the vehicle. If you are driving erratically (by varrying your speed as you say) he'd be foolish not to stop you and make sure everything was ok.

By your own admission however what you were doing was ...

Wow...three years steaming over this? Did you get another ticket?