Charges for not producing license, insurance & registration

Moderators: Reflections, admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Decatur, bend

Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:31 pm

by: Mugwug on
Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:27 pm

Fail to surrender licence, fail to surrender vehicle permit (HTA) and fail to have/surrender insurance card (CAIA) at a minimum.... Of course this assumes that the driver merely fails to produce his DL and doesn't refuse to identify himself when asked.

Obviously more charges would apply if additional problems were identified in the subsequent investigation (invalid or suspended licence, lack of insurance, etc etc etc). I wouldn't expect to be on my way for a little while with that many documentary issues.
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1722
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:18 pm

by: jsherk on
Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:56 pm

What happens if somebody can not produce their drivers license, say because they forgot their wallet at home, but identifies themselves and is given a "fail to produce their license" charge... are they then sent on their merry way (still without their license) or could their vehicle be towed/impounded?
+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++
OPS Copper
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm

by: OPS Copper on
Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:53 am

Verbal is fine as we have in car access to the MTO photo data base. But your still getting the fail to produce ticket. If it is during business hours I have some feeing the vehicle has no insurance i also contacted the insurance companies to check for valid ins.

If you do not want to tell me who your insurance company is then I just part three for all and use fail to have insurance and tow the car.

Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:33 am

Posting Awards

by: Observer135 on
Tue Feb 16, 2016 8:53 pm

Decatur wrote:And by "we" he probably means OPP. No municipal access in car.
I think they do now, according to disclosure I received from YRP, there is a little blurb saying "digital photo on file" that leads me to believe office had access to MTO database from his cruiser and verified DL photo to that on file with MTO.
Not sure why or what is the significance of this on the disclosure, but it's there.
Post a Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “General Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests