thought you were referring to actual use of a high beam (HTA 168)...did not mean to confuse yaSquishy wrote:The full subsection reads: "No person shall use highbeam headlamps that produce alternating flashes of white light on any vehicle other than a vehicle referred to in subsection (1). R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 169 (2)."
Vehicles referred to in (1) are "a public utility emergency vehicle while responding to an emergency and by an emergency vehicle as defined in subsection 144 (1)."
No mention of "when headlights are required," although subsection (1) does say "despite [section which does only apply when lamps are required]". However, since (1) is the subsection allowing a certain action, I take subsection (2) to apply at all times. What isn't clear is what the heck "alternating" means (between sides, or between on/off?).
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Improper vehicle description on disclosure and improper signage?
by probe1989 in Speed TrapsLast post by probe1989 Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:17 pm
-
-
-
New post Improper left turn HTA 141(6)
by Alex132 in Improper left turnLast post by Alex132 Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:45 pm
-
-
-
New post Improper Use of HOV Lane on Interprovincial Bridge
Last post by bez Wed May 03, 2017 11:33 am
-
-
-
New post Disclosure and improper radar manual
by jsherk in General TalkLast post by rank Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:56 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
Help us, Help You!
Hello, we notice you may be using an adblocker...