Driver clocked at 250 km/h

Moderators: admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Reflections, bend, Decatur

User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:37 pm

"# a difficult or unusual or dangerous feat; usually done to gain attention "

He got two out of three there. Stunt x2.

250 km/h is unusual, that's for sure. And at that speed, you're outdriving your headlights, which makes it dangerous. Unless you pulled strings and closed down the highway, then you don't know who you are endangering. I have been on that stretch of highway at all hours of the night - saying that the highway was definitely empty is a mistake.

150 km/h could be argued to be a stunt, too. Saying that someone was really only "20-30 km/h over" because everyone else is doing 120-130 km/h is insane. The limit is clearly posted and is common knowledge. Passing drivers who are already speeding above the limit sounds like a stunt to me. Also, not everyone does 120-130 km/h - I'm the one doing 100 km/h on the dot. Modern cars are certainly capable of 150 km/h, but the majority of drivers are not. They stay out of trouble when everything happens as expected, but one piece of debris on the highway or a large pothole and the brown stuff hits the spinny thing.
         Image


tdrive2
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:49 pm

by: tdrive2 on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:59 pm

Im not going to criticize you if you drive 100 on the dot.

There is nothing wrong with that. If you choose to drive less than the speed limit and the flow of traffic you should be in the far right lane so others can pass you and you don't create traffic jams and enrage other drivers who then will use dangerous and illegal maneuvers to pass you.

I think those that do this cause a lot more problems then a speeder.

Aside i must agree with the tires.

Why isn't that a law. If your traveling faster then the tires your vehicle allows then this is certainly dangerous. I know a lot of Cars come with R rated tires that are good for 170. I think most winter tires are 170.

But the article does not specify what kind of tires he was using so we can not draw that conclusion he could have been using all seasons or winter tires but thanks for pointing that out to me i never though of that.

Lastly highway 400 at Finch avenue is certainly not have pot holes. That highway has new pavement and i believe it is 4 or 5 lanes there. It is really wide with a concrete barrier the asphalt is brand new. The lanes are pretty wide. In fact i was just on it today, it has brand new pavement there is no pot holes.

I am not supporting him. But i do think that in this situation he was endangering himself more then others on the road. he was speed but i dont think this is some sort of stunt.

Taking a car and driving it in a straight line as fast as it can go is not some stunt or special skill. A 12 year old with no license can do that to. It takes no skill or some kind of modified vehicle to take a car down an empty highway until the speed odo wont move anymore. From the sounds the road must have been vacant in the middle of the night.

It was dangerous, he deserved the ticket, he should have taken it to the track, not welcome on public roads, but this is no stunt and it is still wrong to steal his car for 7 days.


User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:16 pm

On any public road, if you are a danger to yourself, you are a danger to others.

I would like to see any 12-year-old get up to 250 km/h. A car at those speeds will not travel straight on its own. You are making a few minute corrections on the steering wheel every second, which some people do without even realising it. Aside from potholes, I have seen shoes, 2x4s, strollers, briefcases, tires, and all sorts of interesting debris on the highway. At 250 km/h at night, could you see a dark object like a tire or a briefcase in time to avoid it?
         Image


User avatar
hwybear
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Moderator

by: hwybear on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:36 pm

It most certainly is a stunt "as defined" by the Highway Traffic Act.

There was an show on Discovery last week about the Concorde jet that crashed just after take-off. The resulting investigation included the runway. On the runway the investigators located a 18 inch long x 3 inch piece of metal. They tracked this metal to a jet that had taken off 5 minutes prior, it was some part off of the engine shroud. This metal just by coincidence was laying up and not flat, the Concorde went powering up down the runway, and a tire hit the metal. The metal cut the tire, the tire ripped apart and a piece of tire flew up into the wing. The force of the impact (tire/wing) was on the fuel tank, since it was full fuel had no where to expand and blew a hole out elsewhere and caught fire, thus taking down the plane.......to make it short, that piece of metal could easily be on the highway.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


pinch
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:57 pm

by: pinch on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:42 pm

Yeah, it was snow tires he was driving. I saw it on the news. That OPP guy that replaced Cam Wooley was going on about the tires he had.


User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:14 pm

What's the highest speed rating you can get a set of snow tires in? V?

Hopefully it wasn't some off-brand tire like Champiro - in which case he probably traded death for a license suspension.
         Image


User avatar
hwybear
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2933
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Moderator

by: hwybear on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:25 pm

Cruiser snow tires are H rated = 210km/hr.

Don't know if there is a "V" 240km/hr snow tire.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


User avatar
Radar Identified
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Toronto

Moderator

by: Radar Identified on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:33 pm

tdrive2 wrote:I bet alot of you have done this.
Not even close. I've done a lot of stupid things in my life but I've never gone anywhere close to 250 km/h, at night, in the winter, on an urban highway which is full of inattentive and stupid morons. Some of us may also have done stupid things in the past but doing what this guy did? I doubt it.
tdrive2 wrote:Who was he endangering besides himself?
The 400 is not empty even after midnight. The GTA has the busiest highway network in North America and, I'm sure you've noticed, is the worst city in which to drive on the continent. It's not solely aggressive or inattentive drivers; it's everything. Drivers are completely unpredictable, there is no one "driving style," and it ranges from the super-aggressive to the hyper-scared. There is too much traffic and too little predictability to attempt those speeds. One of the things that made his speed so dangerous is that people change lanes without looking, and even if they were doing a speed of, say, 120 km/h, he's going so fast that he'd crash right into the back of them and leave a gooey mess all over the highway before he'd even realize that "hey, that guy's going to cut me off." Another dangerous aspect is that people think that daytime running lights are headlights around here, so he assumed that he'd be able to see the outline of Tweedle-Dum-Lights-Off going 80 km/h in the second-to-left lane before smashing into his back end and sending him flying 500 feet into the air. Even the "aggressive" drivers on the 400 who might be going 150-160 km/h slaloming in and out of traffic would be virtual pylons compared to how fast he was going, and he'd hit those "aggressive" drivers so hard that, driving by the crash scene, you'd think that the military came by and launched a howitzer attack. In other words, he was endangering everyone on the road, and even after midnight that would be dozens of people.

Sure you can blame others for "getting in his way," but any driver with half a brain would not drive faster than a speed that would enable him or her to reasonably react to other drivers on the road and their stupidity. At 250, that is not possible.

I despise section 172 as much as anybody. But this guy's driving was totally unreasonable and I think he got off lightly. He should have been arrested.
hwybear wrote:There was an show on Discovery last week about the Concorde jet that crashed just after take-off.
Good analogy. Part of runway safety is ensuring that there is no debris. If an aircraft blows a tire or there's any debris left, most pilots will not accept a takeoff or landing clearance until airport staff have removed it. Our highways don't have that level of protection. 250 km/h is faster than the speed I'd be touching down or taking off at in a jet, and that's in a tightly controlled environment, much more so than our roads.

What I'd like to know is, would the Crown consider upgrading the charges to Dangerous Driving?


User avatar
Reflections
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: somewhere in traffic

Moderator

by: Reflections on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:03 pm

M 81 mph 130 km/h
N 87 mph 140km/h Temporary Spare Tires
P 93 mph 150 km/h
Q 99 mph 160 km/h Studless & Studdable Winter Tires
R 106 mph 170 km/h H.D. Light Truck Tires
S 112 mph 180 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
T 118 mph 190 km/h Family Sedans & Vans
U 124 mph 200 km/h
H 130 mph 210 km/h Sport Sedans & Coupes
V 149 mph 240 km/h Sport Sedans, Coupes & Sports Cars

When Z-speed rated tires were first introduced, they were thought to reflect the highest tire speed rating that would ever be required, in excess of 240 km/h or 149 mph. While Z-speed rated tires are capable of speeds in excess of 149 mph, how far above 149 mph was not identified. That ultimately caused the automotive industry to add W- and Y-speed ratings to identify the tires that meet the needs of new vehicles that have extremely high top-speed capabilities.
W 168 mph 270 km/h Exotic Sports Cars
Y 186 mph 300 km/h Exotic Sports Cars

For reference only :D
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com


User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:15 pm

I found some Pirelli winter tires that were W-rated. I can't imagine they would be any good in real winter conditions, but at least this shows that there is a remote chance that the driver had tires rated for the speeds he reached.
         Image


User avatar
BelSlySTi
Member
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:35 am

by: BelSlySTi on
Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:47 am

Squishy wrote:
Sure it is. It's not racing, and it's mainly the media's fault for making everyone think that 172 is the "street racing" charge. But at 250 km/h, that is definitely performing a stunt. I think I can safely say that no one drives at 250 km/h because it is practical. He was doing it for the adrenaline rush or to show off to others on the highway - performing a stunt.
Blame the media? Gimme a break!!!!!!!

When BILL 203 was put forth ,It was reffered to as the STREET RACING BILL
Frank the Farmer Klees The Father of 203 refers to it as the STREET RACING law
(Email I recieved from back peddling Farmer Frank, note the reference to STREET RACING)

I am acknowledging your email concerning the enforcement of the recent changes to the Highway Traffic Act section 172. Although I did put forward a Private Member’s Bill to address street racing these changes do not reflect my street racing Bill - My Bill applied to incidents in which police had reasonable grounds to determine that “street racing” was involved and that was the basis for roadside suspension and impoundment. I consider the safety of others to be paramount to the rights of a street racer.
The immediate suspension of the driver’s licence and impounding of vehicles when offenders exceed 50 km/h or more of the posted speed limit was not part of my legislation. In fact, I have expressed my opposition to this arbitrary provision which allows for no discretion based on circumstance and disregards due process.
Sincerely,
Frank Klees, MPP

Chief La Barge refers to as the STREET RACING LAW!
Chief Blair refers to it as STREET RACING LAW!
Jim Bradley refers to it as the STREET RACING LAW!
Micheal I don't know what a Pit Bull looks like Bryant refers to it as the STREET RACING LAW!
Chris Bentley refers to it as the STREET RACING LAW!

Woody the OPP Commissioners gofer refers to it as the STREET RACING LAW!
And last but not least, Pinocchio and Geppetto refer to it as the STREET RACING LAW!

You can blame the media for Yellow Journalism and nothing more!

Antonio Talarico is a TOOL who's 0/2 for his rights!

This STREET RACING law is a joke, it was right from the START
and I would bet the farm, Mr. Churchill would agree, if the idiot piss tank was still around!
[img]http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l352/toastedwhitebread/Untitled-TrueColor-03.jpg[/img]


User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:54 am

Looks like the proposal for 172 was purely to address racing, not speeding/stunting. Maybe the media shouldn't get the blame - but it's stupid how people want to argue semantics. Trying to argue that, "There was only one car! How can that be RACING?!" as if that would get the charge thrown out.

Is it dangerous to do any of the actions classified as stunting or racing by the HTA? Yes it is. So don't do it and no one will have to worry about the consequences. With all the media coverage this has gotten, I'd say 90%, if not 100%, of the province's drivers know of 172. If someone knows the consequences but chooses to break that law anyways, they deserve what they get.
         Image


User avatar
Reflections
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
Location: somewhere in traffic

Moderator

by: Reflections on
Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:42 am

Is it really that dangerous to smoke up your tires.....depends on where. However, that is not defined in S.172......
http://www.OHTA.ca OR http://www.OntarioTrafficAct.com


User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

by: Squishy on
Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:27 am

The HTA defines it as intentionally losing traction while turning. I'd say intentionally doing so on a public road is dangerous.
         Image


PetitionGuy
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: Trana

by: PetitionGuy on
Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:28 am

lets look at some history folks

12 years ago, your Canadian Gov't via it's Postal service released a stamp of one of the Country's noted heroes

http://www.museegillesvilleneuve.com/f1 ... stamps.htm

pretty cool honour eh? getting your mug on a Canadian stamp is some serious props

BTW....the guy on this stamp freely admitted to constantly "trying" to make it from Montreal to Toronto in 2 hours while at the wheel of his Ferrari street car on the 401

and nobody called him a murderer....or wanted to crush his car....or throw him in jail.......nope....other way around for this guy...the Canadian Gov't put him on a stamp FFS


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “General Talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests