My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months. It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract. When he plead gulity to driving in Contravention he understood that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation. Thanks for any help. Ed
My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months. It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract.
When he plead gulity to driving in Contravention he understood that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation.
Courts can not add demerit points (offences for those are HTA OREG 339/94) OR prevent suspensions as legislated in the HTA MTO suspends licences as per direction/authority of the HTA Novice (beginners) licence suspensions are in HTA OREG 340/94 9(5) MTO notifies person of suspension and time the suspension starts (usually notified by registered mail) 9(4) licence shall NOT be reinstated until 30 days AFTER the licence has been surrendered or up to a maximum of two years Appears that the the letter was recieved indicating start of suspension date and the "surrender of licence" part was ignored for several months, then finally surrendered licence to which time the 30 day suspension began.
Courts can not add demerit points (offences for those are HTA OREG 339/94) OR prevent suspensions as legislated in the HTA
MTO suspends licences as per direction/authority of the HTA
Novice (beginners) licence suspensions are in HTA OREG 340/94
9(5) MTO notifies person of suspension and time the suspension starts (usually notified by registered mail)
9(4) licence shall NOT be reinstated until 30 days AFTER the licence has been surrendered or up to a maximum of two years
Appears that the the letter was recieved indicating start of suspension date and the "surrender of licence" part was ignored for several months, then finally surrendered licence to which time the 30 day suspension began.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Thanks for the information. I was trying to be brief in the posting, but if you do not mind reading this and letting me know your thoughts I would greatly appreciate it. He was originally charged with BAC above 0 he was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He did nothing and was convicted in absentia. He then appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Thanks to you I now understand that the MTO suspends based on the HTA. I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence. If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally). Any help is much appreciated, Ed
Thanks for the information. I was trying to be brief in the posting, but if you do not mind reading this and letting me know your thoughts I would greatly appreciate it.
He was originally charged with BAC above 0 he was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He did nothing and was convicted in absentia. He then appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention.
Thanks to you I now understand that the MTO suspends based on the HTA. I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence.
If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally).
I am still a little unclear on the situation, so I am re posting with all the details that may be relevant. Any help would be greatly appreciated. My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. He was originally charged with BAC above 0. He was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He missed his court date and was convicted in absentia. He then found out at the court that he was convicted and appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Paid the fine on time and thought this was the end of it. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months (he recieved no notice of suspension until getting an Insurance quote they informed him, that is why he got the abstract). It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract. When he plead guilty to driving in Contravention he understood form the prosecutor that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation? I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence. If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally). Thanks for any help. Ed
I am still a little unclear on the situation, so I am re posting with all the details that may be relevant. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. He was originally charged with BAC above 0. He was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He missed his court date and was convicted in absentia. He then found out at the court that he was convicted and appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Paid the fine on time and thought this was the end of it.
His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months (he recieved no notice of suspension until getting an Insurance quote they informed him, that is why he got the abstract). It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract.
When he plead guilty to driving in Contravention he understood form the prosecutor that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation?
I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence.
If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally).
The MTO may suspend a licence for novice violations. I do not know if that is what happened here. It may have been a suspension for the 32(9) violation, which they are entitled to do, though 7 months does seem harsh. It also seems possible that the suspension was automatic upon conviction for BAC above 0 conviction and then when that conviction was overturned, no one told the MTO to revoke the suspension.
The MTO may suspend a licence for novice violations. I do not know if that is what happened here. It may have been a suspension for the 32(9) violation, which they are entitled to do, though 7 months does seem harsh. It also seems possible that the suspension was automatic upon conviction for BAC above 0 conviction and then when that conviction was overturned, no one told the MTO to revoke the suspension.
ORGINAL POST and NEW CREATED POST by original poster MERGED together *********************************************************************************** Driving in breach of condition prohibited 32 (9) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while contravening a condition contained in his or her drivers licence or imposed by the regulations Conditions for G2 are "imposed" by HTA OREG 340/94 6 (1)(1) BAC must be zero 9 (1) conviction of a violating any condition of under section 6 and the licence will be suspended ******************************** now I would sign a waiver that he will not operate my vehicle and have him removed from my insurance. Then get him a bicycle and/or bus pass.
ORGINAL POST and NEW CREATED POST by original poster MERGED together
32 (9) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while contravening a condition contained in his or her drivers licence or imposed by the regulations
Conditions for G2 are "imposed" by HTA OREG 340/94
6 (1)(1) BAC must be zero
9 (1) conviction of a violating any condition of under section 6 and the licence will be suspended
********************************
now I would sign a waiver that he will not operate my vehicle and have him removed from my insurance. Then get him a bicycle and/or bus pass.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Thanks again for the information. So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand. I do understand the get a bike sentiment though! Thanks, Ed
Thanks again for the information. So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand. I do understand the get a bike sentiment though!
Ah, ok, understand a lot better now. I can not find the proper area for your answer at the moment, but thinking there should be something written similiar to this below..... Demerit point (HTA OREG 339/94) 5. (1) If a person convicted of an offence set out in Column 1 of the Table appeals the conviction and notice of the appeal is served on the Registrar, the conviction and the demerit points related to it shall not be entered on the persons record unless the conviction is sustained on appeal (2) If a conviction referred to in subsection (1) and related demerit points have been recorded prior to service of notice of an appeal on the Registrar, the conviction and demerit points shall be removed from the record, and any suspension imposed as a result of the conviction shall be stayed, as of the date notice is served on the Registrar, unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
Euroed wrote:
So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand.
Ah, ok, understand a lot better now.
I can not find the proper area for your answer at the moment, but thinking there should be something written similiar to this below.....
Demerit point (HTA OREG 339/94)
5. (1) If a person convicted of an offence set out in Column 1 of the Table appeals the conviction and notice of the appeal is served on the Registrar, the conviction and the demerit points related to it shall not be entered on the persons record unless the conviction is sustained on appeal
(2) If a conviction referred to in subsection (1) and related demerit points have been recorded prior to service of notice of an appeal on the Registrar, the conviction and demerit points shall be removed from the record, and any suspension imposed as a result of the conviction shall be stayed, as of the date notice is served on the Registrar, unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Ed, think I just found the answer at HTA 55 ********************************** Suspension on appeal 55. If a person whose licence has been suspended enters an appeal against his or her conviction and serves notice of the appeal on the Registrar, the suspension is stayed from the time notice is served on the Registrar unless the conviction is sustained on appeal. ********************************** Now, I'm no legal print person here, but appears not only do you have to appeal to the court on the conviction, you also have to serve notice of the appeal to the MTO (Register).
Ed,
think I just found the answer at HTA 55
**********************************
Suspension on appeal
55. If a person whose licence has been suspended enters an appeal against his or her conviction and serves notice of the appeal on the Registrar, the suspension is stayed from the time notice is served on the Registrar unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
**********************************
Now, I'm no legal print person here, but appears not only do you have to appeal to the court on the conviction, you also have to serve notice of the appeal to the MTO (Register).
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
That is very helpfiul. Thanks for all the work. He has all the records from the court and has contacted the ministry and they will not change it. This is why I am confused. It seems to me that if he appeals (he had no idea he would have to inform the MTO, neither would I have) and gets the charges reduced (I suppose it is better then BAC over 0 to have driving in contravention) and can produce all the documents the MTO should adjust his abstract. They will not speak to anyone but him, so I rely on him when he says they refuse to change it. Do you have any suggestions on what to do now? Once again, thanks for all the help. Ed
That is very helpfiul. Thanks for all the work. He has all the records from the court and has contacted the ministry and they will not change it. This is why I am confused. It seems to me that if he appeals (he had no idea he would have to inform the MTO, neither would I have) and gets the charges reduced (I suppose it is better then BAC over 0 to have driving in contravention) and can produce all the documents the MTO should adjust his abstract. They will not speak to anyone but him, so I rely on him when he says they refuse to change it. Do you have any suggestions on what to do now? Once again, thanks for all the help.
if they are being stuborn on the phone, forget the phone. Send it in writing. The legal way - registered mail, track it, request the changes and provide copies of the relevent paper work.
if they are being stuborn on the phone, forget the phone. Send it in writing. The legal way - registered mail, track it, request the changes and provide copies of the relevent paper work.
pulled over leaving a survey in guelph. After arguing with the officer for about 10 minutes, he mentioned something being wrong with my truck. Told me to put on my emergency brake, and i did. Told me to put it in gear, and i did, truck did not move. Told me to hit the gas, and i did and the truck…
Got two very heavy tickets -- for failing to stop for a school bus, and for using a handheld device. Was running late in a morning rush traffic in Toronto and apparently passed a school bus on the opposite side w/o noticing its signal. A few meters after that I stopped behind the other cars waiting…
I recently received a ticket for proceeding contrary to sign at an intersection. While there are other issues with the offence (sign is not visible until 10ft from intersection, officer wrote wrong license plate number on ticket) my biggest question is about the sign itself.
I posted here a *while* back when I first got my speeding ticket, and I've been fighting it forever. Anyway, long story short - I went and had an appeal and both the prosecutor and the Judge agree that I have valid grounds to appeal on, but what we're arguing is whether the correct remedy is a…
My wife had an auto accident back in May. It is gradually being dealt with by our insurance company ( by the broker actually). My question is about the legal power of the insurance code OAP1. Evidently this set of rules is the Ten Commandments for the insurance companies and the adjustors seem to…
What is the requirement for stopping when a school bus is traveling down the roadway, initiates the flashing red lights while still moving but has not yet stopped? If a motorist is traveling through an intersection (through the free-flow approach, minor-street stop controlled) and an oncoming…
In 2005, the government passed legislation that enabled the introduction of variable speed limits at some point in the future. It didn't take effect right away, so it sat waiting for "proclamation by the Lieutenant Governor." Just by chance... I was reading the HTA earlier while browsing this…
I was on my way to work on a divided four lane highway. I was in the right hand lane following the flow of traffic. There was a slower car ahead of me and I wanted to change lanes and maintain my speed. When I looked in my left side mirror, I notice a red car going pretty fast in the passing…
So i got charged with Hand Held Device, just want to ask everyone if i could use this as my defence
It was midnight, I was dropping my fiance to pick up something on north bound Yonge st (near church) with my emergency lights on, Officer came and asked me to move along so i went up a few streets and…