My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months. It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract. When he plead gulity to driving in Contravention he understood that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation. Thanks for any help. Ed
My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months. It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract.
When he plead gulity to driving in Contravention he understood that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation.
Courts can not add demerit points (offences for those are HTA OREG 339/94) OR prevent suspensions as legislated in the HTA MTO suspends licences as per direction/authority of the HTA Novice (beginners) licence suspensions are in HTA OREG 340/94 9(5) MTO notifies person of suspension and time the suspension starts (usually notified by registered mail) 9(4) licence shall NOT be reinstated until 30 days AFTER the licence has been surrendered or up to a maximum of two years Appears that the the letter was recieved indicating start of suspension date and the "surrender of licence" part was ignored for several months, then finally surrendered licence to which time the 30 day suspension began.
Courts can not add demerit points (offences for those are HTA OREG 339/94) OR prevent suspensions as legislated in the HTA
MTO suspends licences as per direction/authority of the HTA
Novice (beginners) licence suspensions are in HTA OREG 340/94
9(5) MTO notifies person of suspension and time the suspension starts (usually notified by registered mail)
9(4) licence shall NOT be reinstated until 30 days AFTER the licence has been surrendered or up to a maximum of two years
Appears that the the letter was recieved indicating start of suspension date and the "surrender of licence" part was ignored for several months, then finally surrendered licence to which time the 30 day suspension began.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Thanks for the information. I was trying to be brief in the posting, but if you do not mind reading this and letting me know your thoughts I would greatly appreciate it. He was originally charged with BAC above 0 he was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He did nothing and was convicted in absentia. He then appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Thanks to you I now understand that the MTO suspends based on the HTA. I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence. If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally). Any help is much appreciated, Ed
Thanks for the information. I was trying to be brief in the posting, but if you do not mind reading this and letting me know your thoughts I would greatly appreciate it.
He was originally charged with BAC above 0 he was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He did nothing and was convicted in absentia. He then appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention.
Thanks to you I now understand that the MTO suspends based on the HTA. I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence.
If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally).
I am still a little unclear on the situation, so I am re posting with all the details that may be relevant. Any help would be greatly appreciated. My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. He was originally charged with BAC above 0. He was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He missed his court date and was convicted in absentia. He then found out at the court that he was convicted and appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Paid the fine on time and thought this was the end of it. His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months (he recieved no notice of suspension until getting an Insurance quote they informed him, that is why he got the abstract). It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract. When he plead guilty to driving in Contravention he understood form the prosecutor that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation? I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence. If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally). Thanks for any help. Ed
I am still a little unclear on the situation, so I am re posting with all the details that may be relevant. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
My son was convicted of Class G-2 Licence Contravention. He was originally charged with BAC above 0. He was a .003 on the roadside screening device. He missed his court date and was convicted in absentia. He then found out at the court that he was convicted and appealed the decision (it was allowed) and plead guilty to 32-9 Driving in Contravention. Paid the fine on time and thought this was the end of it.
His driver abstract from the MTO shows the violation and then a suspension for 7 months (he recieved no notice of suspension until getting an Insurance quote they informed him, that is why he got the abstract). It then shows the suspension was expired or rescinded, on the date it would have been reinstated according to the original suspension. It seems like a rather lengthy suspension for the above conviction. He has nothing else on his driver abstract.
When he plead guilty to driving in Contravention he understood form the prosecutor that it would be 0 demerit points and no suspension just a fine. Can the MTO suspend your licence for any period they wish for the HTA 32-9 violation?
I do not know if 32-9 is a suspension offence.
If the suspension is proper and his abstract is correct, case closed for me. I just would like to be sure I understand the process and punishment as this has had a dramatic affect on Insurance premiums (naturally).
The MTO may suspend a licence for novice violations. I do not know if that is what happened here. It may have been a suspension for the 32(9) violation, which they are entitled to do, though 7 months does seem harsh. It also seems possible that the suspension was automatic upon conviction for BAC above 0 conviction and then when that conviction was overturned, no one told the MTO to revoke the suspension.
The MTO may suspend a licence for novice violations. I do not know if that is what happened here. It may have been a suspension for the 32(9) violation, which they are entitled to do, though 7 months does seem harsh. It also seems possible that the suspension was automatic upon conviction for BAC above 0 conviction and then when that conviction was overturned, no one told the MTO to revoke the suspension.
ORGINAL POST and NEW CREATED POST by original poster MERGED together *********************************************************************************** Driving in breach of condition prohibited 32 (9) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while contravening a condition contained in his or her drivers licence or imposed by the regulations Conditions for G2 are "imposed" by HTA OREG 340/94 6 (1)(1) BAC must be zero 9 (1) conviction of a violating any condition of under section 6 and the licence will be suspended ******************************** now I would sign a waiver that he will not operate my vehicle and have him removed from my insurance. Then get him a bicycle and/or bus pass.
ORGINAL POST and NEW CREATED POST by original poster MERGED together
32 (9) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while contravening a condition contained in his or her drivers licence or imposed by the regulations
Conditions for G2 are "imposed" by HTA OREG 340/94
6 (1)(1) BAC must be zero
9 (1) conviction of a violating any condition of under section 6 and the licence will be suspended
********************************
now I would sign a waiver that he will not operate my vehicle and have him removed from my insurance. Then get him a bicycle and/or bus pass.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Thanks again for the information. So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand. I do understand the get a bike sentiment though! Thanks, Ed
Thanks again for the information. So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand. I do understand the get a bike sentiment though!
Ah, ok, understand a lot better now. I can not find the proper area for your answer at the moment, but thinking there should be something written similiar to this below..... Demerit point (HTA OREG 339/94) 5. (1) If a person convicted of an offence set out in Column 1 of the Table appeals the conviction and notice of the appeal is served on the Registrar, the conviction and the demerit points related to it shall not be entered on the persons record unless the conviction is sustained on appeal (2) If a conviction referred to in subsection (1) and related demerit points have been recorded prior to service of notice of an appeal on the Registrar, the conviction and demerit points shall be removed from the record, and any suspension imposed as a result of the conviction shall be stayed, as of the date notice is served on the Registrar, unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
Euroed wrote:
So the appeal and subsquent guilty plea do not over ride the original conviction? I do not fully understand.
Ah, ok, understand a lot better now.
I can not find the proper area for your answer at the moment, but thinking there should be something written similiar to this below.....
Demerit point (HTA OREG 339/94)
5. (1) If a person convicted of an offence set out in Column 1 of the Table appeals the conviction and notice of the appeal is served on the Registrar, the conviction and the demerit points related to it shall not be entered on the persons record unless the conviction is sustained on appeal
(2) If a conviction referred to in subsection (1) and related demerit points have been recorded prior to service of notice of an appeal on the Registrar, the conviction and demerit points shall be removed from the record, and any suspension imposed as a result of the conviction shall be stayed, as of the date notice is served on the Registrar, unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Ed, think I just found the answer at HTA 55 ********************************** Suspension on appeal 55. If a person whose licence has been suspended enters an appeal against his or her conviction and serves notice of the appeal on the Registrar, the suspension is stayed from the time notice is served on the Registrar unless the conviction is sustained on appeal. ********************************** Now, I'm no legal print person here, but appears not only do you have to appeal to the court on the conviction, you also have to serve notice of the appeal to the MTO (Register).
Ed,
think I just found the answer at HTA 55
**********************************
Suspension on appeal
55. If a person whose licence has been suspended enters an appeal against his or her conviction and serves notice of the appeal on the Registrar, the suspension is stayed from the time notice is served on the Registrar unless the conviction is sustained on appeal.
**********************************
Now, I'm no legal print person here, but appears not only do you have to appeal to the court on the conviction, you also have to serve notice of the appeal to the MTO (Register).
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
That is very helpfiul. Thanks for all the work. He has all the records from the court and has contacted the ministry and they will not change it. This is why I am confused. It seems to me that if he appeals (he had no idea he would have to inform the MTO, neither would I have) and gets the charges reduced (I suppose it is better then BAC over 0 to have driving in contravention) and can produce all the documents the MTO should adjust his abstract. They will not speak to anyone but him, so I rely on him when he says they refuse to change it. Do you have any suggestions on what to do now? Once again, thanks for all the help. Ed
That is very helpfiul. Thanks for all the work. He has all the records from the court and has contacted the ministry and they will not change it. This is why I am confused. It seems to me that if he appeals (he had no idea he would have to inform the MTO, neither would I have) and gets the charges reduced (I suppose it is better then BAC over 0 to have driving in contravention) and can produce all the documents the MTO should adjust his abstract. They will not speak to anyone but him, so I rely on him when he says they refuse to change it. Do you have any suggestions on what to do now? Once again, thanks for all the help.
if they are being stuborn on the phone, forget the phone. Send it in writing. The legal way - registered mail, track it, request the changes and provide copies of the relevent paper work.
if they are being stuborn on the phone, forget the phone. Send it in writing. The legal way - registered mail, track it, request the changes and provide copies of the relevent paper work.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…