Hello Everyone, I received a ticket from a police officer who pulled me over for supposedly entering the intersection and driving through a red light. I was very certain that I did not enter the intersection on the red. I requested a meeting with the prosecutor and the disclosure of all written and video evidence. I received the video that was taken from the police vehicle after the police vehicle turned on the road, way behind me. Since the police vehicle was turning, the camera only captured when the lights are already amber. I am driving toward the intersection and since the intersection is on a slight uphill, there is no way to see on the footage from the camera's angle where the stop line is. There is no way to tell if I am ahead, on or after the stop line while the traffic signals turned red. What makes the whole thing more interesting is that this intersection has 2 traffic lights to direct the traffic, and when I tried to print out the crucial "split-seconds" of the lights turning amber to red, I noticed that the signal on the left was still amber while the signal on the right already changed! Video evidence differs from those taken by the "red light cameras", and does lack all the details. You can't see the stop line, the pedestrian crossing, etc. I only know that I did not drive into the intersection while it was already red. Any input would be much appreciated!
Hello Everyone,
I received a ticket from a police officer who pulled me over for supposedly entering the intersection and driving through a red light. I was very certain that I did not enter the intersection on the red. I requested a meeting with the prosecutor and the disclosure of all written and video evidence. I received the video that was taken from the police vehicle after the police vehicle turned on the road, way behind me. Since the police vehicle was turning, the camera only captured when the lights are already amber. I am driving toward the intersection and since the intersection is on a slight uphill, there is no way to see on the footage from the camera's angle where the stop line is. There is no way to tell if I am ahead, on or after the stop line while the traffic signals turned red.
What makes the whole thing more interesting is that this intersection has 2 traffic lights to direct the traffic, and when I tried to print out the crucial "split-seconds" of the lights turning amber to red, I noticed that the signal on the left was still amber while the signal on the right already changed!
Video evidence differs from those taken by the "red light cameras", and does lack all the details. You can't see the stop line, the pedestrian crossing, etc. I only know that I did not drive into the intersection while it was already red.
First of all, post the video (if you can and block out your license plate info) so we can all see it. Second, the video is not the entire case; the officer will testify to fill in a lot of gaps in the video such as where the stop bar is, your estimated speed, etc. So, don't be fooled in to thinking the video needs to prove the entire case; it doesn't. In most cases, video is not available. In most cases, the video is actually used corroborate a lot of what the officer testifies to, such as the date, time, location, weather, visibility, traffic conditions, etc. The officer will then 'fill in' what the video may be missing such as where the stop bar is, if there is a crosswalk, your estimated speed and distance from the stop bar, especially when the light first turned amber (i.e. did it afford you time to stop), etc. Even though fail to obey amber light is not an included offence of disobey red light, some JP's will view the distances and speed to estimate whether you could reasonably have stopped your car at the stop bar on the red and proceeded with the speed your car was at subsequently. (Remember, JP's are experienced in doing this quite often with red light camera charges where officer testimony is not even needed). So, if you'd like, let us all see the video so you can hear what many of us on this forum think it shows.
First of all, post the video (if you can and block out your license plate info) so we can all see it.
Second, the video is not the entire case; the officer will testify to fill in a lot of gaps in the video such as where the stop bar is, your estimated speed, etc. So, don't be fooled in to thinking the video needs to prove the entire case; it doesn't. In most cases, video is not available.
In most cases, the video is actually used corroborate a lot of what the officer testifies to, such as the date, time, location, weather, visibility, traffic conditions, etc. The officer will then 'fill in' what the video may be missing such as where the stop bar is, if there is a crosswalk, your estimated speed and distance from the stop bar, especially when the light first turned amber (i.e. did it afford you time to stop), etc. Even though fail to obey amber light is not an included offence of disobey red light, some JP's will view the distances and speed to estimate whether you could reasonably have stopped your car at the stop bar on the red and proceeded with the speed your car was at subsequently. (Remember, JP's are experienced in doing this quite often with red light camera charges where officer testimony is not even needed).
So, if you'd like, let us all see the video so you can hear what many of us on this forum think it shows.
I am sorry but I have no idea how I can upload a video here. It is a T-Bone intersection, 2 lanes on my direction of the road, one turns left, one turns right. The speed limit is 50km/h. I was in the left lane to make a wide left turn. The police vehicle turned out to the road where I was proceeding prior to the left turn, and was driving behind me. The moment he turned onto the road, the lights were already amber (according to his dashcam). I was driving way ahead of him. From his perspective is no way to tell where was my vehicle. He cannot say (or in fact, no one could say) that I was on the stop line or not. He was way behind me. He could not witness what was the position of my car in relation to the stop line. The amber lights at the intersection are 3 seconds long. You can see in the link that there are 2 lights that supposed to be in synch, one is ahead, the other is slightly to the left ahead. On the police officer's note, it says that I told him I thought "that best to go through instead of trying to stop". I did not say that. I said that I noticed the yellow light late, tried to break (you see it on the video) but I felt it seemed unsafe and I determined it is better to drive through or I would only stop already in the road. If I slowed more down, I would have crossed the stop line on red for sure! He also mentions I speed up. True. After determining that I would slide into the intersection, I speed up, likely about 15 m from the intersection (based on the footage). (According to physics, it would require about 15 m to stop with 50km/h). My perception was that I am to close to stop, so I speed up after I initially applied the break. I am certain, I did not cross the stop line on red! The video I received contains, no speed data. Frankly, I am not sure how fast I was driving but since it is a left turn I doubt I would have driven into the intersection over the speed limit. Thanks to all of you! https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.6479288, ... 384!8i8192
I am sorry but I have no idea how I can upload a video here.
It is a T-Bone intersection, 2 lanes on my direction of the road, one turns left, one turns right. The speed limit is 50km/h. I was in the left lane to make a wide left turn.
The police vehicle turned out to the road where I was proceeding prior to the left turn, and was driving behind me. The moment he turned onto the road, the lights were already amber (according to his dashcam). I was driving way ahead of him. From his perspective is no way to tell where was my vehicle. He cannot say (or in fact, no one could say) that I was on the stop line or not. He was way behind me. He could not witness what was the position of my car in relation to the stop line. The amber lights at the intersection are 3 seconds long.
You can see in the link that there are 2 lights that supposed to be in synch, one is ahead, the other is slightly to the left ahead.
On the police officer's note, it says that I told him I thought "that best to go through instead of trying to stop". I did not say that. I said that I noticed the yellow light late, tried to break (you see it on the video) but I felt it seemed unsafe and I determined it is better to drive through or I would only stop already in the road. If I slowed more down, I would have crossed the stop line on red for sure! He also mentions I speed up. True. After determining that I would slide into the intersection, I speed up, likely about 15 m from the intersection (based on the footage). (According to physics, it would require about 15 m to stop with 50km/h). My perception was that I am to close to stop, so I speed up after I initially applied the break. I am certain, I did not cross the stop line on red!
The video I received contains, no speed data. Frankly, I am not sure how fast I was driving but since it is a left turn I doubt I would have driven into the intersection over the speed limit.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…