I didn't receive the original "notice to appear in court' until yesterday, and found out my court date is in 10 days. Is it still worth filing for disclosure? (I realized I had never received one and went down to the courthouse to get copies...boo) It's for a speeding ticket and failing to show proper car documents. V
I didn't receive the original "notice to appear in court' until yesterday, and found out my court date is in 10 days. Is it still worth filing for disclosure? (I realized I had never received one and went down to the courthouse to get copies...boo)
It's for a speeding ticket and failing to show proper car documents.
You can file for disclosure any time. But I wouldn't expect to have received disclosure on time. If you appear for your trial date and, having not received the disclosure, you request an adjournment, the delay will be deemed to been caused by you and any future trials will likely proceed whether you are prepared to or not.
You can file for disclosure any time. But I wouldn't expect to have received disclosure on time.
If you appear for your trial date and, having not received the disclosure, you request an adjournment, the delay will be deemed to been caused by you and any future trials will likely proceed whether you are prepared to or not.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
You should file for disclosure immediately, and show due diligence. On the day of your trial, speak to the prosecutor prior and explain that you were only notified of your trial after personally checking in with the court, as no mailed notice was received, and therefore there was no adequate time frame for them to provide disclosure. In a situation like yours it is quite understandable that you would be filing for disclosure at such a late time. The prosecutor at this point can choose to A:) Withdraw the charges B:) Request an adjournment from the Justice because of institutional error or C:) Tell you "Tough luck" and proceed to trial. Option A: is best possible outcome. No trial occurs. Option B: is a good outcome. You should remember that you would, in a case like this, reiterate to the Justice that you are not Waiving Your Rights, and due to institutional error cannot take the blame for the adjournment. Option C: is the worst outcome. You should try and find some case law supporting your argument, which will be that: Due to an error in notification of the trial date at the court's fault, you were unable to request disclosure in a respectable time-frame. You will show that you did request for disclosure as soon as you received you Notice of Trial (via fax is recommended) after attending court to check. It is an unfortunate circumstance, but in no way are you waiving your rights or blaming the Prosecution. This is an institutional error, and the only means of preserving the process is to grant an adjournment. Remember that your right to disclosure is a Charter mandated one. We also have what's called an adversarial system, so by speaking to the Prosecutor about the circumstances you again show due diligence with regards to figuring the situation out and trying to find a solution prior to entering the court room. Good luck.
You should file for disclosure immediately, and show due diligence. On the day of your trial, speak to the prosecutor prior and explain that you were only notified of your trial after personally checking in with the court, as no mailed notice was received, and therefore there was no adequate time frame for them to provide disclosure. In a situation like yours it is quite understandable that you would be filing for disclosure at such a late time. The prosecutor at this point can choose to A:) Withdraw the charges B:) Request an adjournment from the Justice because of institutional error or C:) Tell you "Tough luck" and proceed to trial.
Option A: is best possible outcome. No trial occurs.
Option B: is a good outcome. You should remember that you would, in a case like this, reiterate to the Justice that you are not Waiving Your Rights, and due to institutional error cannot take the blame for the adjournment.
Option C: is the worst outcome. You should try and find some case law supporting your argument, which will be that: Due to an error in notification of the trial date at the court's fault, you were unable to request disclosure in a respectable time-frame. You will show that you did request for disclosure as soon as you received you Notice of Trial (via fax is recommended) after attending court to check. It is an unfortunate circumstance, but in no way are you waiving your rights or blaming the Prosecution. This is an institutional error, and the only means of preserving the process is to grant an adjournment. Remember that your right to disclosure is a Charter mandated one. We also have what's called an adversarial system, so by speaking to the Prosecutor about the circumstances you again show due diligence with regards to figuring the situation out and trying to find a solution prior to entering the court room.
Thanks so much for the information below! Yes this is tough because I don't even have the original tickets to it's really difficult for me to build a case! Your suggestions are very appreciated. V
Thanks so much for the information below! Yes this is tough because I don't even have the original tickets to it's really difficult for me to build a case!
Your suggestions are very appreciated.
V
mnstrcck wrote:
You should file for disclosure immediately, and show due diligence. On the day of your trial, speak to the prosecutor prior and explain that you were only notified of your trial after personally checking in with the court, as no mailed notice was received, and therefore there was no adequate time frame for them to provide disclosure. In a situation like yours it is quite understandable that you would be filing for disclosure at such a late time. The prosecutor at this point can choose to A:) Withdraw the charges B:) Request an adjournment from the Justice because of institutional error or C:) Tell you "Tough luck" and proceed to trial.
Option A: is best possible outcome. No trial occurs.
Option B: is a good outcome. You should remember that you would, in a case like this, reiterate to the Justice that you are not Waiving Your Rights, and due to institutional error cannot take the blame for the adjournment.
Option C: is the worst outcome. You should try and find some case law supporting your argument, which will be that: Due to an error in notification of the trial date at the court's fault, you were unable to request disclosure in a respectable time-frame. You will show that you did request for disclosure as soon as you received you Notice of Trial (via fax is recommended) after attending court to check. It is an unfortunate circumstance, but in no way are you waiving your rights or blaming the Prosecution. This is an institutional error, and the only means of preserving the process is to grant an adjournment. Remember that your right to disclosure is a Charter mandated one. We also have what's called an adversarial system, so by speaking to the Prosecutor about the circumstances you again show due diligence with regards to figuring the situation out and trying to find a solution prior to entering the court room.
Ok, so today i was driving down steeles ave and i got pulled over, the officer approached me and got my license and pulled it up.
he came back and said my license is suspended :O i had no idea or else i wouldnt be driving at all.....the reason for the license suspension was unpaid fines....
Hi everyone, after 12 years of clean driving, I got my first ticket. I had stepped out to grab a bite and left my valid licence in my other pocket. I had an expired "valid photo ID" licence in my vehicle that I keep just in case I need photo ID. I gave the officer that one and I told him my valid…
My teenager was in an accident last Sept where another car was rear-ended.
It was an accident in every sense...it was the middle of the weekday and the kids were looking for a chip truck in durham region. No speeding or racing, they were distracted trying to find it in an unfamiliar town and…
I was served with a Fail to Surrender Insurance Card (S3(1) of Compulsory Auto Insurance Act). He received it within the jurisdiction of Barrie POA. The trial is scheduled for November 14 2017.
I was stopped by Barrie OPP on my way back from a weekend up in Midland ON on June 28, 2017 and…
this is ALL I got in terms of notes. No record of calibration before or after.
my question is, should I send a second request for the officer's notes from the day? or can I run with this and press the point that he didn't test the unit before or after?
Friend of mine was stopped and asked to blow into alcohol test meter just because he said he had 2 drinks earlier in the night (like 4,5 hours before being stopped). He wasn't behaving erratic or driving out of line. The officer said he noted him to pull behind few parked cars and then…
Hello everyone I'm not sure if this is the right place to put it but I need some answers as I'm very scared and don't know what to do. Recently if got a Novice Driver B.A.C Above zero I am 23 years old and I'm pretty due to get my G class license in a couple of weeks. I understand that I was wrong…