Search found 1722 matches
- Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:00 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Cop Never Filed Ticket in System
- Replies: 19
- Views: 10187
Re: Cop Never Filed Ticket in System
I don't know the answer to your questions, so hopefully somebody else on the forum can help.
- Fri Apr 29, 2016 3:52 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Cop Never Filed Ticket in System
- Replies: 19
- Views: 10187
Re: Cop Never Filed Ticket in System
What do you mean by "ticket receipt"? I assume this is something they get from the police stating there is a 3-day suspension? MTO will not (can not) take any further action against you until you are actually found guilty and convicted of a charge.
When an officer lays a charge, they have 7 days to file it with the court. If they don't, then the ...
When an officer lays a charge, they have 7 days to file it with the court. If they don't, then the ...
- Thu Apr 28, 2016 10:16 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Speeding conviction appeal
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9399
Re: Speeding conviction appeal
Definitely dowload the transcript and appeal that was prepared at this thread http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7286.html because there are some good similarities with your case.
I do not believe we can convince the courts that tuning forks are needed until somebody can afford to bring a certified expert witness to their trial. Again ...
I do not believe we can convince the courts that tuning forks are needed until somebody can afford to bring a certified expert witness to their trial. Again ...
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 11:41 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Speeding conviction appeal
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9399
Re: Speeding conviction appeal
You must have had an old manual because they removed the tuning fork test requirement from all the manuals in 2010. So as far as the courts are concerned, as long as the officer does the test listed in the manual then this is prmia facia evidence it was working correctly. If the manufacture does not require a tuning fork then it is not necessary ...
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 9:03 pm
- Forum: Hand-held devices
- Topic: Plead or Request court date? (Worthwhile?)
- Replies: 17
- Views: 14380
Re: Plead or Request court date? (Worthwhile?)
In person is probably better when trying to negotiate.
Most likely they will NOT have the disclosure.
Let's assume the prosecutor does offer you some kind of a plea deal... you could ask "Can I see disclosure before I decide whether to accept that or not?"
The prosecutor may say "Sure, no problem." which is what you want them to say, and leaves ...
Most likely they will NOT have the disclosure.
Let's assume the prosecutor does offer you some kind of a plea deal... you could ask "Can I see disclosure before I decide whether to accept that or not?"
The prosecutor may say "Sure, no problem." which is what you want them to say, and leaves ...
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:42 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Speeding conviction appeal
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9399
Re: Speeding conviction appeal
To get photos admitted as evidence you need to print them out with a date stamp on at a place like walmart. However even if you can't get them admitted as evidence, you should still be able to show them to the officer while they are on the stand and ask them question about them.
Did you specifically try to get photos/manual admitted as evidence ...
Did you specifically try to get photos/manual admitted as evidence ...
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:41 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: WIN speeding 26 over
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4678
Re: WIN speeding 26 over
If the link above in the second post no longer work, then PM me directly for copy of the defence.
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 8:39 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: WIN on appeal - speeding 115 in a 100
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3531
Re: WIN on appeal - speeding 115 in a 100
If the links above in the original post no longer work, then PM me directly for copy of transcript and appeal.
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 3:22 pm
- Forum: Improper driving when road is divided into lanes
- Topic: Failure to drive in Marked Lane. Sec: 156(1)(a)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5010
Re: Failure to drive in Marked Lane. Sec: 156(1)(a)
So make sure you do NOT tell the prosecution or the officer that this is the wrong charge until at least 6 months have passed, as they can withdraw the charge and re-issue the correct one. So you do NOT want early resolution and do NOT want to meet/talk with the prosecutor on any date before the trial.
You want to plead NOT GUILTY and request a ...
You want to plead NOT GUILTY and request a ...
- Wed Apr 27, 2016 3:16 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Speeding conviction appeal
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9399
Re: Speeding conviction appeal
Personally I would definitely appeal this!
Just a point of clarification... this would have been in front of Justice of the Peace and not a Judge. If you go to appeal, it will be in front of Judge. Judge's have more training/understanding of the law, so this is a good thing.
I agree with your issue about radar not being externally verified ...
Just a point of clarification... this would have been in front of Justice of the Peace and not a Judge. If you go to appeal, it will be in front of Judge. Judge's have more training/understanding of the law, so this is a good thing.
I agree with your issue about radar not being externally verified ...
- Tue Apr 26, 2016 8:38 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: What are possible pleas for 141(5)?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1305
Re: What are possible pleas for 141(5)?
It's not your choice.
The prosecutor may, if they choose, offer you some kind of plea deal. But they are not required to do this.
The prosecutor may, if they choose, offer you some kind of plea deal. But they are not required to do this.
- Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:41 pm
- Forum: Improper left turn
- Topic: 141 (5) - Officer recommended to battle in court
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4304
Re: 141 (5) - Officer recommended to battle in court
So in this instance, the officer did not witness the crash and therefore at least one of the two or three witnesses would need to be there to testify in order for you to be charged. You should NOT take the witness stand and should NOT testify against yourself.
So there is a chance that none of the witnesses will show up in which case the charge ...
So there is a chance that none of the witnesses will show up in which case the charge ...
- Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:16 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Can I still get charged by OPP?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2954
Re: Can I still get charged by OPP?
Yes you can relax! 
- Tue Apr 26, 2016 2:45 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Can I still get charged by OPP?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2954
Re: Can I still get charged by OPP?
He can charge you based on what he observed at the time he talked to you and any witnesses.
For a Provincial Offences charge (speeding, etc), they only have 6 months to charge you.
For a criminal charge though, I think they can come along and charge you years after if they really wanted to. But the question is, what criminal charge would they ...
For a Provincial Offences charge (speeding, etc), they only have 6 months to charge you.
For a criminal charge though, I think they can come along and charge you years after if they really wanted to. But the question is, what criminal charge would they ...
- Fri Apr 22, 2016 7:07 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Careless Driving & Witness Notice to Court
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4462
Re: Careless Driving & Witness Notice to Court
people charged with S. 130 HTA walk away without major slap
When you are charged with anything (careless driving, speeding, no dog tags for your dog, etc) you are innocent until proven guilty. Getting a ticket does not mean you are convicted yet. You must be found guilty first which is followed by a conviction and the consequences. Now you can ...
When you are charged with anything (careless driving, speeding, no dog tags for your dog, etc) you are innocent until proven guilty. Getting a ticket does not mean you are convicted yet. You must be found guilty first which is followed by a conviction and the consequences. Now you can ...