Ontario Highway Traffic Act

please add what specific section is on the offence notice......this will help other users to reply appropriately

moved below post to keep on topic

myticket wrote:Hi,

Finally I have ordered a transcript for the trail. But I just received a Fax for Notice of time and place for Appeal Court.

I want to adjorn the appeal Court date until I received my transcript. What is the procedure for that. Can someone please help me.

Thanks

Brentman88 wrote:I got charged for no insurance. and invalid licence plates. Cop pulled me over for no reason.

Checking the plates and seeing they were invalid is a very good reason for a stop.

akarimov wrote:Here is my problem. I got two tickets
1. Driving without insurance slip ($120)
2. Fail to have 2 license plates ($120).

this must not be from Ontario as those are not proper fine amounts for the offence you listed

Radar Identified wrote: A good example of a reliable external test is where the police drive down the road, turn the radar on and compare the results versus their calibrated speedometer. That's done for devices that are installed in the police cruiser... why not an external test for a hand-held?

Lidar does have the external test.

however, if I can find a legit case law of use...I will bring it to all your attention, maybe with flashing lights

this post was attached to unrelated thread, moved here...by moderator

I got charged for no insurance. and invalid licence plates. Cop pulled me over for no reason. I couldnt show insurance, so he private towed me at a fee.
Said dont worry about it.

At that time (Aug.19) could he pull me over for no reason? I didnt get charged for a driving ...

hwybear: the specific radar gun is not important.

absolutely it is important....if the unit does not exist using case law of a non-existent unit is redundant. How would one test a unit that does not exist? can't be done!

anyway,
I understand where you are attempting to go on this.

I would humbly suggest that every vehicle on the highway ...

IMHO - lots of holes in that case anyway without siting any case law that is actually out-dated as cases since then reversed those decisions. A "Lidar LTI-20 radar" gun does not even exist is the first thing that jumps right out. Testing was not explained properly.

someone will pick that up with his approval and make a hit!!

and the music video with the pants on the ground.....well as long as its Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders

Reflections wrote:

hwybear wrote:

radar bill wrote: No manual was included. I have been researching and see that this unit comes with tuning forks. When are they to be used? .

You have found the American version not Canadian.

I would say they all come with the forks bear, just you don't need them.

No tuning forks come with the units and no where in the manual does it mention them....

camper66 wrote:Is it reasonable to suggest that given all the factors, that the officer could have lost track of the vehicle and if so would that not be reasonable doubt?

How would an officer lose track of a vehicle if it catches up to the cruiser and pulls in behind, pulls in behind 2 vehicles back or passes the cruiser?

It is not an HTA violation.

I would guess it would go on your licence and onto your driving abstract, but don't have a clue. I have never seen it on a driving abstract

The back of the offence notice should list where the court is and that is where the JP will be for the "guilty with an explanation" plea, if that is your intended route.

radar bill wrote: No manual was included. I have been researching and see that this unit comes with tuning forks. When are they to be used? .

You have found the American version not Canadian.