Hi all, I'm new to this site and so far I'm really impressed with it - thanks to everyone who has/is contributing... it's really helpful for someone like me, who has a lot of unanswered questions. I know this topic has been covered before, but I couldn't find the answer to my specific question in any of the threads, so I thought I'd start a new topic and see if anyone can help me. I received a ticket from a red-light camera in Hamilton, Ontario the other day - I suppose I have no excuse for running the red light... I guess I misjudged my point of no return and entered the intersection after the light had turned red. After beating myself up about it for about 24 hours, and then starting to think more rationally again, I started to wonder about my options. In looking into it online, I discovered that many people recommend just paying the $180.00 without making any fuss, so that there will be no 'court record' of it and my insurance rates will not be affected. However, I have also read some conflicting information that says that if I DO decide to go to court/police station and plead 'guilty with an explanation', my insurance rates will still not be affected because the info still won't be available to my insurance company. Does anyone know definitively which of the above is true? I figure in both cases I'm technically pleading 'guilty', since if I pay the $180 I'm still agreeing that I ran the red light. So why would showing up at the police station to plead guilty with an explanation be any different in terms of records that are kept (and are thus available or not available to insurance companies)? I'd actually like to plead guilty with an explanation and try to get the fine reduced, since I don't really have $180 to 'throw away' (of course, who does?), but if it could possibly affect my insurance, I'd rather just pay the $180 because it'll probably be less in the long run... right? Just another note: Apparently the process for pleading guilty with an explanation in Hamilton is to just 'show up' at the police station between certain hours of the day and tell them what you're doing there and then they take you to see a Justice of the Peace (so it's not really 'formal court', I guess) - just thought this info might help anyone who potentially has an answer for me. Thanks in advance to anyone who can shed some light! Steph
Hi all,
I'm new to this site and so far I'm really impressed with it - thanks to everyone who has/is contributing... it's really helpful for someone like me, who has a lot of unanswered questions.
I know this topic has been covered before, but I couldn't find the answer to my specific question in any of the threads, so I thought I'd start a new topic and see if anyone can help me.
I received a ticket from a red-light camera in Hamilton, Ontario the other day - I suppose I have no excuse for running the red light... I guess I misjudged my point of no return and entered the intersection after the light had turned red. After beating myself up about it for about 24 hours, and then starting to think more rationally again, I started to wonder about my options. In looking into it online, I discovered that many people recommend just paying the $180.00 without making any fuss, so that there will be no 'court record' of it and my insurance rates will not be affected. However, I have also read some conflicting information that says that if I DO decide to go to court/police station and plead 'guilty with an explanation', my insurance rates will still not be affected because the info still won't be available to my insurance company.
Does anyone know definitively which of the above is true? I figure in both cases I'm technically pleading 'guilty', since if I pay the $180 I'm still agreeing that I ran the red light. So why would showing up at the police station to plead guilty with an explanation be any different in terms of records that are kept (and are thus available or not available to insurance companies)? I'd actually like to plead guilty with an explanation and try to get the fine reduced, since I don't really have $180 to 'throw away' (of course, who does?), but if it could possibly affect my insurance, I'd rather just pay the $180 because it'll probably be less in the long run... right?
Just another note: Apparently the process for pleading guilty with an explanation in Hamilton is to just 'show up' at the police station between certain hours of the day and tell them what you're doing there and then they take you to see a Justice of the Peace (so it's not really 'formal court', I guess) - just thought this info might help anyone who potentially has an answer for me.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can shed some light!
The back of the offence notice should list where the court is and that is where the JP will be for the "guilty with an explanation" plea, if that is your intended route.
The back of the offence notice should list where the court is and that is where the JP will be for the "guilty with an explanation" plea, if that is your intended route.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I got a hand-held device ticket on Thursday March 16. $490 and 3 demerit points. The officer was hiding on a street and I drove by him with my phone in my hand.
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…
Around 3 months ago my friend told me that he thinks he ran Red Light on highway 7. ok his car was 1-2 meters away the Stop Line when the Light turned RED he then couldn't stop so he ran because Speed Limit on HWY7 is 80km/h and you all know none of drivers do under 80km/h they always at 83-85km/h,…
Today I was pulled over by a cop, and he told me that I was following to closely. There was no collision - I was following him, and I had kept enough distance (I would have atleast 1 car length or more) - when he turned on the lights and siren, I pulled over - this means that I was able to brake in…
Per the subject, I was stopped just over a week ago. I mentioned to the officer that I was going with traffic, and couldn't have been going over 125km. He mentioned that I was spotted by aircraft, and that he is just the messenger for aircraft patrol.
This morning, I was on the WB 407 on my way to school. For about 15 km, I was following an OPP SUV in the left lane. The officer was generally driving between 120 and 125, and I made sure to keep a safe distance. Before I go any further, yes, I know I was speeding,…
I was recently charged with a speeding ticket and driving with a suspended license. I was given the tickets on Feb 3rd and have since hired a paralegal. The paralegal asked when my court/summons date was. I cannot seem to find my tickets so I called the court and gave them my driver's license to…
How easy would it be to beat a ticket for "failing to provide proof of insurance" for the simple reason of a street name misspelling on my proof of insurance? The street is a woman's name, ending in ie, but the insurance slip was spelled with a y. In my mind this is not a failure to…
Issued in a news release by Toronto Police Traffic Services Sergeant Tim Burrows, these were the top 10 peeves of drivers in an on-line survey by the Toronto Police:
10. Slow drivers
9. Slower-moving drivers who pull into your lane when you're going faster
