Ontario Highway Traffic Act

It pretty much as simple as placing your hand on them and declaring a "citizen's arrest". This isn't traffic court, you dont have to be that particular.

You can plan word it if you wish.

"Your Worship, I just recieved the disclosure package today and have not had enough time to read it. I ask for an adjournment and that this is not of my own doing, not be counted against my right to a speedy trial."

Overpass vs roadside = same result. Whether you are 5m higher than the target or 5m to the side of the target, there is no difference.
I would beg to differ. From the side of the road you would be more likely to maintain the target of the front plain of the car. From the overpass, your target might be the front licence plate, but your have now ...

But a sweep/panning error is possible on overpasses, less so when roadside. I wonder if the full alignment check was performed?

untilproven wrote:So it doesn't matter that he didn't use his radar to measure my speed? ---He had a reference and with what he has written down, I would find you guilty in court.
Or that he doesn't have a device to measure the distance between the other vehicle and mine? --Irrelevent

If you wish to beat this you'll have to look at a different angle.

Don't worry about the case law until your next court date. Resend the request for your information.

I attended court today knowing that I would ask for a postponemen...I did not receive any disclosure until it was handed to me today.
Now all I got was a copy of the trial request, a copy of the ticket and some very brief notes from the officiers log.
I was shocked when I noted that the officer recorded that I was passing another car when he ...

124 lead vehicle, 124 locked, 123, 124.
Passing slower van.
Next vehicle, two lengths off him was silver infinity.
First black lexus.
Infinity on its tail, no gain or losing ground.


The officer was thourough and this would be tough to beat heads up. A plea bargin could be in your future.

The bold text tells me that the officer had a ...

with the fact that they disclosed
* 2 different types of hand held radar manuals and ------- could help you
*not specify before and after shift tests, and ---- will help you
* models/make of radar used was unclear and ------- could help you
* not given the position of police car and target vehical ----- non issue
can I argue that the police ...

Your assessment is correct. Now make the officer say it on the stand.

You may require some serious legal representation, read Greenspan, to call into question the officers eye sight, and I for one would not do it.

you asking a little late for this. But the older units are plus/minus 3, do a google search.....do you disclosure as to which unit was used to catch you? This is a huge step...........if you have not then ask for a continuance to perform more research....you may or may not get it.......google like hell now.....which juristiction were you in?

you should still go.... let her do the talking.....

Anyone can represent anyone. You need to be court approved before you can charge money for it though........ your friend's, uncle's next-door neighbours grandmother could do it......

You pulled out and you didn't even guess what was going on.
(you have to take in the big picture as if you were above watching it from above)


If someone in front of me slams the brakes and turns I might be a wee bit pissed, especially if there was no signal. 20 under for 5 minutes is:
A. Far too slow
B. Inconsiderate
C. Dangerous to those ...