No light on bike after dark

Moderators: Reflections, admin, hwybear, Radar Identified, Decatur, bend

argyll
VIP
VIP
Posts: 888
Joined:

Posting Awards

Re: No light on bike after dark

Unread post by argyll on

screeech wrote:You can only play the motion of non suit card after the Crown has tendered all of their witnesses. Once the Crown has concluded their case you can make the motion. I am still having a very hard time with the whole sidewalk not being a part of the highway thing. Even ditches are considered highways if between the property lines, why wouldn't a side walk?
Ive been querying that in my head too. I wonder if it's fenceline to fenceline in the country and curb to curb in the towns ??
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !


screeech
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 324
Joined:

Unread post by screeech on

I wouldn't think so, there is no distiction in the definition.


User avatar
Decatur
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 697
Joined:

Posting Awards

Moderator

Unread post by Decatur on

We were taught that in a rural are its fence line to fence line and it a city it's "store front" to "store front". Most cities own a portion of the property up a residential front lawn for the purposes of installing infrastructure etc.

I wouldnt be hinging this whole thing on that one lower court decision. I've looked at a few more that decide just the opposite.


argyll
VIP
VIP
Posts: 888
Joined:

Posting Awards

Unread post by argyll on

And that is the problem in lots of cases. People find one case law that supports their argument and ignore the dozen case laws that are contrary.
Former Ontario Police Officer. Advice will become less relevant as the time goes by !


Keegan
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 28
Joined:

Unread post by Keegan on

I think it's fair to say the case law argument, especially being non-binding, is pretty weak. I figure our main defence will be cross-examining the officer and pointing to reasonable doubt, assuming his testimony gives us the opportunity.

I checked out the street she was stopped on and it's actually very well lit by street lights -- do you think this could be construed as "sufficient" light or cast doubt on the insufficiency the officer alleges, especially if there is no evidence introduced as to when exactly sunset was?


jsherk
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 1722
Joined:

Unread post by jsherk on

Well the section says between sunset and sunrise so sufficient light is irrelevent IMO.




+++ This is not legal advice, only my opinion +++


Post Reply

Return to “General Talk”