I have thread or two on this forum that outlines my situation. Basically was convicted of HTA 154(1)(c) that even in their own words requires an official sign and that the sign be erected. The cop's testimony included no such references to any official signs/erected signs instead he mentions painted signs. Well today finally I had my appealed heard (for literally under 1 minute) and the judge dismissed. This was my fourth court date on this appeal. First time judge loses control and precludes herself. Second time new judge, asks me to provide a letter to him and the prosecutor outlining my argument and adjourns. So I do so but provide it on the date of my third (2nd with the new judge) court date. He says that he asked for it in advance, says he has to review it and was about to put it down for a little bit until the prosecutor says he has another matter in another court room so the judge adjourns it again. Now today it was the fourth appearance and the judge dismissed my appeal in under a minute. Basically he kept asking me why I didn't bring it up at the original trial. I explained to him that the judge wouldn't let me speak (clearly indicates in the transcript the judge cuts me off saying my CLA rep had to speak). So I explained to him that the CLA rep was hard of hearing (also in the transcripts) and was incompetent and didn't adequately represent me. He says I'm wasting the courts time, that the matter keeps being put over (where it was him/the other judge who precluded or the prosecutor who were asking to adjourn) keeps saying it should of been brought it up on that day of my trial, and dismisses my appeal. My letter clearly outlined in detail. Pointed out the Lane Designation Sign regulations, pointed out the officer's testimony, etc. Still made no difference. Was completely railroaded. So I was convicted of when no such official/erected sign exists at that intersection and the officer's testimony states in plain english the lanes were divided by painted lane signs. And today a Ontario Court of Justice judge dismisses my appeal even after reading the letter where I outline the error of law to the court. This is incredible. Do I have any legal avenues at this point? And then they wonder why people go postal. ----------------------------------------------------------- Original thread(s) ... I know the one gentleman asked me to keep everything in one thread but this one I think deserves it's own thread... Just shows the corruption man. You only get justice in this country if your rich or have connections, the common man can forget it, the judge and the prosecutor are against you and they are in collusion and belong to the same bar association. http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/post33388.html http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic7149.html