Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:13 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
mountaineerca wrote:
in my opinion, I don't mind the judge or the prosecutor want to do a similar assessment but the key point is this assessment must be done before the trial starts and the decision shall be given to me in advance.


That's what they're supposed to do, in a way. Before the trial, if you've made a stay application based on non-disclosure, the Justice would review it and decide what to do. That is, if the Justice knows what he's doing. If the non-disclosed material wouldn't have affected the outcome, he or she can rule against the stay. That said, they (the Crown) should err on the side of providing disclosure if requested. What happened at your trial was rather bizarre, to put it mildly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 103
What happened was a fraudulent trial. It's not a loophole to ask to have a clear understanding...it is a RIGHT. We all have a RIGHT to a fair trial. It cannot be fair if the evidence is not disclosed in its entirety.

No-one has a right to enter a plea for you either...that is fraudulent practice. only an accused can enter a plea. Therefore what happened was fraudulent, no doubt about it. I would appeal on the grounds that you were not given a fair trial and that you did not receive full disclosure....BUT most importantly you should also appeal on the grounds that you lack full understanding of what was happening due to the FACT that you were denied YOUR RIGHT to a fair trial. What has happened is a total wrongdoing.... but it happens daily in courts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:30 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:30 pm
Posts: 7
CoolChick wrote:
What happened was a fraudulent trial. It's not a loophole to ask to have a clear understanding...it is a RIGHT. We all have a RIGHT to a fair trial. It cannot be fair if the evidence is not disclosed in its entirety.

No-one has a right to enter a plea for you either...that is fraudulent practice. only an accused can enter a plea. Therefore what happened was fraudulent, no doubt about it. I would appeal on the grounds that you were not given a fair trial and that you did not receive full disclosure....BUT most importantly you should also appeal on the grounds that you lack full understanding of what was happening due to the FACT that you were denied YOUR RIGHT to a fair trial. What has happened is a total wrongdoing.... but it happens daily in courts.


appreciate your clarification. in the same court under the same judge on that day, one poor defendant is saying he didn't receive disclosure for his speeding ticket. that judge determined that he trusted the cop got enough training on the radar, tested and used it properly. In that way he said there would no disclosure for that poor guy. It doesn't look like the judge is not familiar with the law and proper procedure. he is doing it on purpose - assuming nobody will bother to appeal or can afford the time and money for appeal. He is there to maintain law and order by violating the law.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:23 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 103
You have to remember.... although the TRUTH is that we have a RIGHT to a fair trial...it is highly unlikely that we will get one. the reason is:

You are the defendant and you represent self.

The plaintiff is 'Province of Ontario.'


Who does the officer represent ?

Who does the judge represent ?

Who does the prosecutor represent ?

Yes thats right....'Province of Ontario'

Doesn't sound too fair to me.... !!!!! :evil:

But then we must not question facts...just do as we are told and suffer the consequences of that injustice. :roll: :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:28 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 103
Acts are not laws.... but legislations created to bring in REVENUE....

In other words a business... Province of Ontario is a corporation and trades as a business just like the police dept does. I think they should change the name from Ontario Court of Justice to Ontario Court of Business.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:42 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 14
Any news on what happened?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey sign HTA 182(2)

nis

1

1657

Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:34 pm

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DISOBEY SIGN - HTA.182(2), HELP!!!!

driver300

7

6501

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:46 am

driver300 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign - (HTA 182 (2))

vwprince

2

1348

Sun Jan 05, 2014 2:15 am

vwprince View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign HTA 182 (2)

Danno5069

1

954

Sat Feb 13, 2016 2:51 pm

bobajob View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign HTA 182 2

TeeSee

3

454

Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:25 am

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) What is the definition?

diggyj

4

3069

Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:28 pm

Neely2005 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign - HTA 182 (2) - Mississauga

someguy123

4

2641

Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:13 am

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey sign HTA 182(2) for speeding?

Terminator3

3

508

Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:45 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey sign HTA 182(2) U Turn

Jackson5

2

581

Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:35 pm

Jackson5 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Traffic sign under HTA 182 (2)

sohan6996

1

177

Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:25 am

Zatota View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign HTA 182 (2) - Municipality of Toronto

Morena

7

8091

Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:10 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) - Convicted Today

bpassand

2

1595

Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:38 pm

bpassand View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.