Hello everyone, on September 25 I was in Toronto and making a right turn on a yellow light. Mid-turn, I noticed a car was turning left from the opposite direction so I fully stopped to allow the car to proceed safely. As there were two lanes in the road that we were both driving into, it would have been a safe turn regardless. The other car ended up being a police car and the PO stared me down, waited for me to pass him and pulled me over. When the officer came over, he mentioned that our conversation was being recorded and that his video is recording as well. He asked if I knew why he was pulling me over and I said it was because I stopped suddenly, to which he responded in the affirmative. He asked for insurance as well, and since I had recently renewed it I had some trouble looking for it. He mentioned he would just take the older one for now and he could see on the computer if it was still in force, so I handed him the older one. He came back with two tickets, one for failure to stop at a red light 144(18) and the other for driving without insurance. As he gave back the insurance I found out that the new insurance card was right behind the older one I gave him and he didn't bother to look behind it. I have not yet received notice of trial in the mail, but checked online and saw that my court date was set on June 20, 2017 (roughly 9 months away). I sent a disclosure request via certified mail but did not include my phone number as suggested by ticketcombat. Also checked on the website of the Toronto / Scarborough courts and there is no mention that you need to include phone number. However, I have read that the JP and prosecutor can hold it against you if you did not include a phone number or e-mail address. Is there any merit to this or are you under no obligation to include an e-mail address or phone number? Additionally, let's say I do not receive disclosure after requesting 3 times and show up on the court date and the JP says I should have included a phone number. If the case is adjourned to a later date, it would likely be past the 10 month threshold - would that be enough grounds to file a chapter 11b? Thanks again for your help!
Hello everyone, on September 25 I was in Toronto and making a right turn on a yellow light. Mid-turn, I noticed a car was turning left from the opposite direction so I fully stopped to allow the car to proceed safely. As there were two lanes in the road that we were both driving into, it would have been a safe turn regardless. The other car ended up being a police car and the PO stared me down, waited for me to pass him and pulled me over. When the officer came over, he mentioned that our conversation was being recorded and that his video is recording as well. He asked if I knew why he was pulling me over and I said it was because I stopped suddenly, to which he responded in the affirmative. He asked for insurance as well, and since I had recently renewed it I had some trouble looking for it. He mentioned he would just take the older one for now and he could see on the computer if it was still in force, so I handed him the older one. He came back with two tickets, one for failure to stop at a red light 144(18) and the other for driving without insurance. As he gave back the insurance I found out that the new insurance card was right behind the older one I gave him and he didn't bother to look behind it.
I have not yet received notice of trial in the mail, but checked online and saw that my court date was set on June 20, 2017 (roughly 9 months away). I sent a disclosure request via certified mail but did not include my phone number as suggested by ticketcombat. Also checked on the website of the Toronto / Scarborough courts and there is no mention that you need to include phone number. However, I have read that the JP and prosecutor can hold it against you if you did not include a phone number or e-mail address. Is there any merit to this or are you under no obligation to include an e-mail address or phone number?
Additionally, let's say I do not receive disclosure after requesting 3 times and show up on the court date and the JP says I should have included a phone number. If the case is adjourned to a later date, it would likely be past the 10 month threshold - would that be enough grounds to file a chapter 11b? Thanks again for your help!
You want your disclosure request, so trying to avoid contact isn't some sort of strategy. Is a phone number a requirement? Not necessarily, but give it to them if you have one. If you don't have a phone number for them to use, at least have an email address available. If you're giving them no other option other than snail mail, sure, it could be a problem. Forcing them to snail mail you a letter saying "Your disclosure package is ready, come pick it up" is a bit much. They aren't mailing out disclosure packages like they used to 5 to 10 years ago, nor or they required to. No. If they've come to the conclusion that the delay is on you, that's your problem. Besides, 10 months is nothing to argue about.
torontoboy89 wrote:
I have not yet received notice of trial in the mail, but checked online and saw that my court date was set on June 20, 2017 (roughly 9 months away). I sent a disclosure request via certified mail but did not include my phone number as suggested by ticketcombat. Also checked on the website of the Toronto / Scarborough courts and there is no mention that you need to include phone number. However, I have read that the JP and prosecutor can hold it against you if you did not include a phone number or e-mail address. Is there any merit to this or are you under no obligation to include an e-mail address or phone number?
You want your disclosure request, so trying to avoid contact isn't some sort of strategy. Is a phone number a requirement? Not necessarily, but give it to them if you have one. If you don't have a phone number for them to use, at least have an email address available. If you're giving them no other option other than snail mail, sure, it could be a problem. Forcing them to snail mail you a letter saying "Your disclosure package is ready, come pick it up" is a bit much. They aren't mailing out disclosure packages like they used to 5 to 10 years ago, nor or they required to.
torontoboy89 wrote:
Additionally, let's say I do not receive disclosure after requesting 3 times and show up on the court date and the JP says I should have included a phone number. If the case is adjourned to a later date, it would likely be past the 10 month threshold - would that be enough grounds to file a chapter 11b? Thanks again for your help!
No. If they've come to the conclusion that the delay is on you, that's your problem. Besides, 10 months is nothing to argue about.
You want your disclosure request, so trying to avoid contact isn't some sort of strategy. Is a phone number a requirement? Not necessarily, but give it to them if you have one. If you don't have a phone number for them to use, at least have an email address available. If you're giving them no other option other than snail mail, sure, it could be a problem. Forcing them to snail mail you a letter saying "Your disclosure package is ready, come pick it up" is a bit much. They aren't mailing out disclosure packages like they used to 5 to 10 years ago, nor or they required to. No. If they've come to the conclusion that the delay is on you, that's your problem. Besides, 10 months is nothing to argue about. Thanks for the honest response. If I don't hear back in a month or so, I'll send a follow-up request with other contact details.
bend wrote:
torontoboy89 wrote:
I have not yet received notice of trial in the mail, but checked online and saw that my court date was set on June 20, 2017 (roughly 9 months away). I sent a disclosure request via certified mail but did not include my phone number as suggested by ticketcombat. Also checked on the website of the Toronto / Scarborough courts and there is no mention that you need to include phone number. However, I have read that the JP and prosecutor can hold it against you if you did not include a phone number or e-mail address. Is there any merit to this or are you under no obligation to include an e-mail address or phone number?
You want your disclosure request, so trying to avoid contact isn't some sort of strategy. Is a phone number a requirement? Not necessarily, but give it to them if you have one. If you don't have a phone number for them to use, at least have an email address available. If you're giving them no other option other than snail mail, sure, it could be a problem. Forcing them to snail mail you a letter saying "Your disclosure package is ready, come pick it up" is a bit much. They aren't mailing out disclosure packages like they used to 5 to 10 years ago, nor or they required to.
torontoboy89 wrote:
Additionally, let's say I do not receive disclosure after requesting 3 times and show up on the court date and the JP says I should have included a phone number. If the case is adjourned to a later date, it would likely be past the 10 month threshold - would that be enough grounds to file a chapter 11b? Thanks again for your help!
No. If they've come to the conclusion that the delay is on you, that's your problem. Besides, 10 months is nothing to argue about.
Thanks for the honest response. If I don't hear back in a month or so, I'll send a follow-up request with other contact details.
Hi there, just an update to the above situation. Back in January the prosecutor's said my disclosure items were ready to be picked up. They did not include the video that I requested (only officer notes) and so I requested it again that day. I got a call a couple months after saying it was ready to be picked up. I went in early May to pick-up the video, but they said something went wrong and they were unable to find it. They had a DVD but they said that it was the prosecutor's copy, they told me to leave my name and number and they would get back to me. I still haven't heard back and I called again today and they are giving me a bunch of excuses like saying they can't find my original disclosure request and asked me to e-mail my request again, so I did. My question is, my trial date is coming up soon (June 21, 2017). If I don't hear back from them on the video by then are there grounds to get the charges dismissed due to incomplete disclosure? The incident occurred in September 2016, so the trial date is 9 months afterwards. I have taken days off work two times now to pick up my requested disclosure and followed up a number of times so I think I have done my part to try and get disclosure within a reasonable time frame.
Hi there, just an update to the above situation. Back in January the prosecutor's said my disclosure items were ready to be picked up. They did not include the video that I requested
(only officer notes) and so I requested it again that day. I got a call a couple months after saying it was ready to be picked up. I went in early May to pick-up the video, but they said something went wrong and they were unable to find it. They had a DVD but they said that it was the prosecutor's copy, they told me to leave my name and number and they would get back to me. I still haven't heard back and I called again today and they are giving me a bunch of excuses like saying they can't find my original disclosure request and asked me to e-mail my request again, so I did.
My question is, my trial date is coming up soon (June 21, 2017). If I don't hear back from them on the video by then are there grounds to get the charges dismissed due to incomplete disclosure? The incident occurred in September 2016, so the trial date is 9 months afterwards. I have taken days off work two times now to pick up my requested disclosure and followed up a number of times so I think I have done my part to try and get disclosure within a reasonable time frame.
At your first trial date, you will not get the ticket dropped for lack of disclosure. The JP will order prosecutor to get you missing disclosure and set another trial date.
At your first trial date, you will not get the ticket dropped for lack of disclosure. The JP will order prosecutor to get you missing disclosure and set another trial date.
I got a speeding ticket on the 401 by Cornwall. The officer said I was going 140 initially then dropped it to 130 (for the record I don't believe for a second I was going 140, that's way faster than I would ever intentionally drive). I filled out the info on the back of the notice to request a…
I was recently charged with stunt driving on a 60kmh road. When I was pulled over, the officer told me I was going almost 100kmh (still 40kmh above the limit) but was charging me for stunt driving because I accelerated quickly from an intersection on an empty road (in a straight line). I know…
what to do about a an illegal right turn onto steeles from staines rd
got the ticket around october of last year
put it to trial
so there is a big mess of cars at this intersection and I see a cop outside standing directing traffic with a huge row of cars pulled over to the side, through…
Are any non-domestic vehicles "pursuit-rated" in North America? Also have the Michigan State Police (this is relevant because apparently they have the most accepted selection/testing process) tested any of them to see if they meet their criteria? Just curious...
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for…
A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over.
What should the set fine and total payable read?
It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice.
An OPP officer ticketed me claiming I was going 40km/h over the limit (140km/km) on my way home with a few friends on the 401. This is my first ever speeding offense. Although I am sure I was over the limit, I am almost certain that I was not going 40 over, more realistically closer to 30 over. The…
Yesterday night I was charged for stunt driving (excess over 50km/h) and I have a few inquiries. I'm sure you've all heard the same story, but the unmarked cop in an SUV was tailing me for a good 2-3 minutes as I was travelling 120~135 km/h. Then as he came close I decided to boot it up…
I had a speeding ticket in May 2013 which brought me to 9 demerit points out of 15. I received a letter and had to attend an interview. Due to a history of speeding tickets and a previous interview a few years prior, the interviewer decided to put me on zero tolerance for a year. Meaning if I…