I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign. Next thing I know the cop comes out of nowhere and pulls myself and two other people over. He accuses me of going through a stopped bus. I was pretty outraged but kept quiet about it. I'm definitely appealing this. But I haven't seen another case like mine on here and I'm wondering if anyone has any tips and any idea if I have a chance on this one? It's basically my word against his.
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Next thing I know the cop comes out of nowhere and pulls myself and two other people over. He accuses me of going through a stopped bus. I was pretty outraged but kept quiet about it.
I'm definitely appealing this. But I haven't seen another case like mine on here and I'm wondering if anyone has any tips and any idea if I have a chance on this one? It's basically my word against his.
the "stop arm" does not have to be working for this to be an offence. Here is the section for the offence: HTA 175 (11) Every driver meeting on a highway, other than a highway with a median strip, a stopped school bus that has its overhead red signal-lights flashing, shall stop before reaching the bus and shall not proceed until the bus moves or the overhead red signal-lights have stopped flashing
the "stop arm" does not have to be working for this to be an offence.
Here is the section for the offence:
HTA 175 (11) Every driver meeting on a highway, other than a highway with a median strip, a stopped school bus that has its overhead red signal-lights flashing, shall stop before reaching the bus and shall not proceed until the bus moves or the overhead red signal-lights have stopped flashing
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I never saw the lights. I was watching for those too. I stopped looking when I was basically right next to the bus. All I saw was the bus slowing down. All I know is this one would be a killer to insurance so I will be fighting this one.
I never saw the lights. I was watching for those too. I stopped looking when I was basically right next to the bus. All I saw was the bus slowing down. All I know is this one would be a killer to insurance so I will be fighting this one.
My mom was a bus driver and I helped her out a few times as a kid. Usually when a driver blows through the red lights and it's a public school bus then they'll get a bus patroller or someone to write the plate number down so it can be reported. If you're desperate for evidence and it happened recently then you can try to get a hold of the company dispatcher and have them ask the driver if anyone has broken that law recently. That's a far stretch though just to warn you.
My mom was a bus driver and I helped her out a few times as a kid. Usually when a driver blows through the red lights and it's a public school bus then they'll get a bus patroller or someone to write the plate number down so it can be reported.
If you're desperate for evidence and it happened recently then you can try to get a hold of the company dispatcher and have them ask the driver if anyone has broken that law recently.
I'm definitely appealing this. But I haven't seen another case like mine on here and I'm wondering if anyone has any tips and any idea if I have a chance on this one? It's basically my word against his.
So I had my first appearance today. It was real quick, they told me that they can't reduce the charge, only the fine amount. That's obviously not good enough for me, I need this charge dropped. This is my first ever offense (seriously, ever, I've been driving for 10 years), and I have a few questions and would seriously appreciate some answers: 1) If convicted, how bad of an insurance hike would I be looking at? I only pay about $1,600 a year right now. 2) I'm guessing there's no risk of anything other than the $490 fine and 6 demerit points if convicted, right? 3) I'm a little worried of them using video. While I am sure that I did nothing wrong and when I passed the bus, the lights weren't on yet, are they allowed to tape me (either the bus or police) without me knowing about it? Seems like a privacy violation right there. 4) I am getting a paralegal, no questions asked. So I don't think I need to touch this one? Thanks!
So I had my first appearance today. It was real quick, they told me that they can't reduce the charge, only the fine amount. That's obviously not good enough for me, I need this charge dropped. This is my first ever offense (seriously, ever, I've been driving for 10 years), and I have a few questions and would seriously appreciate some answers:
1) If convicted, how bad of an insurance hike would I be looking at? I only pay about $1,600 a year right now.
2) I'm guessing there's no risk of anything other than the $490 fine and 6 demerit points if convicted, right?
3) I'm a little worried of them using video. While I am sure that I did nothing wrong and when I passed the bus, the lights weren't on yet, are they allowed to tape me (either the bus or police) without me knowing about it? Seems like a privacy violation right there.
4) I am getting a paralegal, no questions asked. So I don't think I need to touch this one?
Improper passing of a school bus is considered a major violation by the Insurance Bureau of Canada. Because of the complexity of calculating insurance premiums, no one but your insurance company can tell you how a conviction will affect your rates. However improper passing of a school bus is in the same category with failing to report an accident and driving without insurance, so the increase will probably be big. Also, there is nothing wrong with anybody video taping you without your knowledge in this situation.
Improper passing of a school bus is considered a major violation by the Insurance Bureau of Canada. Because of the complexity of calculating insurance premiums, no one but your insurance company can tell you how a conviction will affect your rates. However improper passing of a school bus is in the same category with failing to report an accident and driving without insurance, so the increase will probably be big.
Also, there is nothing wrong with anybody video taping you without your knowledge in this situation.
+1 You're in a public place. It is reasonable to think that you may be videotaped or photographed at some point, with or without your knowledge. Happens every time you walk into a bank, gas station, grocery store, airport, or even drive through certain intersections. Some insurance companies will terminate your coverage for this particular offence. Although there is no technical link between demerit points and insurance per se... any 6-point or 7-point offence is a big risk for cancellation of coverage.
Simon Borys wrote:
Also, there is nothing wrong with anybody video taping you without your knowledge in this situation.
+1
You're in a public place. It is reasonable to think that you may be videotaped or photographed at some point, with or without your knowledge. Happens every time you walk into a bank, gas station, grocery store, airport, or even drive through certain intersections.
Simon Borys wrote:
so the increase will probably be big.
Some insurance companies will terminate your coverage for this particular offence. Although there is no technical link between demerit points and insurance per se... any 6-point or 7-point offence is a big risk for cancellation of coverage.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Just a question on this.... on a hwy where the speed limit is 80 kmh and a bus is about to make a stop they activate their overhead lights and slow down. Now if a guy is coming towards the bus he would have to stop awful fast to not pass a bus he is oncoming towards at those speeds. I find that bus drivers activate their lights too soon (in this case as they start to slow down, so still doing 70kmh) I assume they do this so the vehicles behind them wont try to pass them . But what are the obligations of oncoming drivers in this situation?
hwybear wrote:
the "stop arm" does not have to be working for this to be an offence.
Here is the section for the offence:
HTA 175 (11) Every driver meeting on a highway, other than a highway with a median strip, a stopped school bus that has its overhead red signal-lights flashing, shall stop before reaching the bus and shall not proceed until the bus moves or the overhead red signal-lights have stopped flashing
Just a question on this.... on a hwy where the speed limit is 80 kmh and a bus is about to make a stop they activate their overhead lights and slow down. Now if a guy is coming towards the bus he would have to stop awful fast to not pass a bus he is oncoming towards at those speeds. I find that bus drivers activate their lights too soon (in this case as they start to slow down, so still doing 70kmh) I assume they do this so the vehicles behind them wont try to pass them . But what are the obligations of oncoming drivers in this situation?
hey I have seen them turn on them early too. I think they are on a schedule and need to save time. If anyone looked at a school bus driver's manual I think it will say that the bus must stop before activating lights.Ask for schoolbus driver, the cop's and the kids' on it (the bus) discloser. Maybe the manual for school buses?(or bring it) You will get off. Cheers Stripe
hey
I have seen them turn on them early too.
I think they are on a schedule and need to save time.
If anyone looked at a school bus driver's manual
I think it will say that the bus must stop before activating lights.Ask for schoolbus driver, the cop's and the kids' on it (the bus) discloser.
Maybe the manual for school buses?(or bring it)
You will get off.
Cheers
Stripe
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
I appreciate everyone's replies so far, it's been great. But I got my court date and it's time to hire someone. I'm going with either POINTTS or X-Copper. Does anyone have a recommendation? And from my understanding, I need to be sure to get a former police officer to represent me?
I appreciate everyone's replies so far, it's been great. But I got my court date and it's time to hire someone. I'm going with either POINTTS or X-Copper. Does anyone have a recommendation?
And from my understanding, I need to be sure to get a former police officer to represent me?
Does not have to be a former police officer. Just make sure that it is a licenced paralegal (Law Society of Upper Canada).
KGBP12 wrote:
I need to be sure to get a former police officer to represent me?
Does not have to be a former police officer. Just make sure that it is a licenced paralegal (Law Society of Upper Canada).
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
Finally ended this today. There were too many trials today so they offered me failure to stop for a stop sign. I said whatever, they let it go to that. Had to pay the same fine but I'm feeling pretty good.
Finally ended this today. There were too many trials today so they offered me failure to stop for a stop sign. I said whatever, they let it go to that. Had to pay the same fine but I'm feeling pretty good.
At least you got something. Just came from court too, the prosecution didn't even offer anything and on top of that they increased the fine :evil: . Was pretty much convicted before I even started. Its ridiculous how they are able to get away with this. For anybody that is also going through this fight as much as you can, the cop and judge will have to mess up sometimes so at least some of us wont get screwed.
At least you got something. Just came from court too, the prosecution didn't even offer anything and on top of that they increased the fine . Was pretty much convicted before I even started. Its ridiculous how they are able to get away with this. For anybody that is also going through this fight as much as you can, the cop and judge will have to mess up sometimes so at least some of us wont get screwed.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…