I received a ticket for failure to stop at a redlight before turning right. I have been notified by prosecution that the video evidence is not available because it takes 2 months to process and my trial date is before that. My question is can I ask the officer questions about their statement of events, which are very vague and then ask for the trial to be adjourned until I have seen the video evidence or must I request the trial to be adjourned at the beginning and ask questions after I have seen the video evidence?
I received a ticket for failure to stop at a redlight before turning right. I have been notified by prosecution that the video evidence is not available because it takes 2 months to process and my trial date is before that.
My question is can I ask the officer questions about their statement of events, which are very vague and then ask for the trial to be adjourned until I have seen the video evidence or must I request the trial to be adjourned at the beginning and ask questions after I have seen the video evidence?
From My Understanding, You can only request an adjournment before the trial starts, since that's what your adjourning. I don't believe you can question the officer pre-trial.
From My Understanding, You can only request an adjournment before the trial starts, since that's what your adjourning. I don't believe you can question the officer pre-trial.
Don't be surprised if the prosecution asks for an adjournment. It sounds like the prosecutor knows or senses his case hinges on the video evidence. If I were in your shoes and the prosecutor didn't ask for an adjournment, I'd roll the dice and go for it. I'd ask the officer to describe in detail where he was positioned, how far he was, how he determined I hadn't stopped, etc. If his notes, as you suggest, are vague, it should be relatively easy to punch holes in his story.
Don't be surprised if the prosecution asks for an adjournment. It sounds like the prosecutor knows or senses his case hinges on the video evidence. If I were in your shoes and the prosecutor didn't ask for an adjournment, I'd roll the dice and go for it. I'd ask the officer to describe in detail where he was positioned, how far he was, how he determined I hadn't stopped, etc. If his notes, as you suggest, are vague, it should be relatively easy to punch holes in his story.
Thanks for the replies. After the officer gave me the ticket for turning right on a red light i went on a way to work. When I got to work I looked at the papers he gave me I realized the officer had given me a second ticket for an 'Expired Permit'. The officer didn't mention anything about this ticket and besides that my permit was valid. The officer did tell me that I had been video recorded from his vehicle and our conversation was being recorded from the microphone on his jacket. However, the disclosure received says there is only video and no audio recording available. Therefore, I was going to go to court and ask for both violations to be thrown out based on the false charge and thus lack of credibility of the officers statements. However, I don't want to put forward this motion, if the judge doesn't agree and I'm denied adjourning the trial for the red light ticket. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Thanks for the replies. After the officer gave me the ticket for turning right on a red light i went on a way to work. When I got to work I looked at the papers he gave me I realized the officer had given me a second ticket for an 'Expired Permit'. The officer didn't mention anything about this ticket and besides that my permit was valid. The officer did tell me that I had been video recorded from his vehicle and our conversation was being recorded from the microphone on his jacket. However, the disclosure received says there is only video and no audio recording available.
Therefore, I was going to go to court and ask for both violations to be thrown out based on the false charge and thus lack of credibility of the officers statements. However, I don't want to put forward this motion, if the judge doesn't agree and I'm denied adjourning the trial for the red light ticket. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
You certainly won't get the charges thrown out. Was your permit expired? If not, bring it on the date of the trial and show the prosecutor it had been issued before the day the officer stopped you. The prosecutor should withdraw that charge at that point. As for the right turn charge, it's up to you to show the officer lacks credibility. A JP will typically take an officer's testimony at face value unless it can be shown that the officer's testimony is unreliable, inconsistent, etc. Did the disclosure actually include the video? Or did it just reference it? As I mentioned the first time, the prosecutor will probably seek an adjournment to get you the video. Another possibility is the prosecutor will hand you a DVD just before the trial. If so, make sure you advise the JP that the Crown just handed you additional disclosure and that you need time to study it so you can make a full answer and defence. To do so, you will need an adjournment. Make sure the JP notes the adjournment as attributable to the Crown. It's also possible the prosecutor will be prepared to go to trial without the video. You then have to decide what you want to do (see my first post).
You certainly won't get the charges thrown out. Was your permit expired? If not, bring it on the date of the trial and show the prosecutor it had been issued before the day the officer stopped you. The prosecutor should withdraw that charge at that point. As for the right turn charge, it's up to you to show the officer lacks credibility. A JP will typically take an officer's testimony at face value unless it can be shown that the officer's testimony is unreliable, inconsistent, etc.
Did the disclosure actually include the video? Or did it just reference it? As I mentioned the first time, the prosecutor will probably seek an adjournment to get you the video. Another possibility is the prosecutor will hand you a DVD just before the trial. If so, make sure you advise the JP that the Crown just handed you additional disclosure and that you need time to study it so you can make a full answer and defence. To do so, you will need an adjournment. Make sure the JP notes the adjournment as attributable to the Crown. It's also possible the prosecutor will be prepared to go to trial without the video. You then have to decide what you want to do (see my first post).
My permit was not expired, so the officer made a false charge. The disclosure stated that there was "video evidence of the offence". However, I was informed that the video would not be available until the trial date because of the time needed to process the video.
My permit was not expired, so the officer made a false charge. The disclosure stated that there was "video evidence of the offence". However, I was informed that the video would not be available until the trial date because of the time needed to process the video.
Bring the permit with you to show it was not expired. The prosecutor should withdraw that charge. As for the video, you'll have to wait until the trial date to see what the prosecutor does. Be prepared for one of the scenarios I described.
Bring the permit with you to show it was not expired. The prosecutor should withdraw that charge. As for the video, you'll have to wait until the trial date to see what the prosecutor does. Be prepared for one of the scenarios I described.
No this won't work. But if your permit was not expired, then bring proof and that charge should get withdrawn.
zouk wrote:
Therefore, I was going to go to court and ask for both violations to be thrown out based on the false charge and thus lack of credibility of the officers statements. However, I don't want to put forward this motion, if the judge doesn't agree and I'm denied adjourning the trial for the red light ticket. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
No this won't work. But if your permit was not expired, then bring proof and that charge should get withdrawn.
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…
