Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Discuss the Ontario Highway Traffic Act.


Post Your Traffic Ticket, and Get Help!


The Ontario Traffic Ticket Forum!


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Check It Out
No unread posts New Set Fines Starting Sept 1st, 2015! Read and Learn Here.
  Print view

question for insiders re prosecutors and their witnesses
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:08 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
I was in court today to get a deal from the prosecutor for speeding 73 in 50 zone. I decided to get a trial date because of the possiblity that the officer won't show up. One thing I learnt from a legal expert (who happened to stop by in the hall and talk to the public) was that I did not have to verify whether or not the officer is present in order to make a deal; that the prosecutor will automatically withdraw the charge once I am called upon if the witness is absent. Indeed, this is what happened to some people. In a courtroom of 20-25 people, I noticed 3 charges withdrawn based on the absence of the witness, and I was only the 10th or so to be called, so I assume there were more (although they do tend to be handled first).

There is, however, one thing I'm not clear about. If the prosecutor arrives 30 minutes before the trial, and thereafter does not communicate with anyone besides the public, then how on earth does he know which officers have made it or not?
Do the officers and prosecutor all arrive together? If not, how does it work?

I just wonder whether in fact we can trust the prosecutor to always announce when the witness is not present before the defendant is charged.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:40 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
most prosecutors know each officer, a quick glance at officers and they know who is there and not.
- could also be a note on their desk that officer "X" called in sick today and officer "Y" is at criminal court, so not available for traffic court

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:08 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
Ok, so let's say that they are notified on that day about who will not be present for whatever reason. That still leaves a lot of uncertainty as to whether the rest will in fact make it. I say this assuming that the prosecutor does not meet with every single officer before proceeding to the courtroom. Or do they?

The reason I don't think this is a trivial question is because... let's say a defendant accepted a deal with the prosecutor, but then decides to play hardball in the courtroom, and so before he enters a guilty plea, he asks the prosecutor "is your witness present?" What does he say? Does he know for sure that the witness is available outside?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:53 am 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 354
Here games like that get an automatic court re-schedule and usually an e-mail to the cop advising them for next time.

OPS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:18 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
I thought something like that might happen, but is it always the case? Perhaps the JP might think it would be a waste of valuable time/resources to reschedule. And then there's always the argument for the right to a speedy trial if the reschedule is months away. If everyone played hardball and got a reschedule, surely that would be a very convenient loophole for defendants, but I doubt it's that simple. So thanks for the input, but I'd like to hear some more opinions if there are any.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:08 pm 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:31 pm
Posts: 502
aoex wrote:
I thought something like that might happen, but is it always the case? Perhaps the JP might think it would be a waste of valuable time/resources to reschedule. And then there's always the argument for the right to a speedy trial if the reschedule is months away. If everyone played hardball and got a reschedule, surely that would be a very convenient loophole for defendants, but I doubt it's that simple. So thanks for the input, but I'd like to hear some more opinions if there are any.


It is not a good idea.

Like OPS said the DA will get a adjournment and you will get no deals.

Also if you live in the area where the cop patrols you can expect to
get pulled over a lot.

Cheers
Viper1

_________________
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:57 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
Quote:
It is not a good idea.

Like OPS said the DA will get a adjournment and you will get no deals.


So you agree with OPS, but can you elaborate on why getting an adjournment is necessarily bad? As I pointed out, a reschedule could be used towards an 11b argument, no? And once again, I ask, will the DA always get an adjournment?

Quote:
Also if you live in the area where the cop patrols you can expect to
get pulled over a lot.


So the officer is going to hold a grudge against me because I made him attend my court appearance and he will haunt me for the rest of my life? ;)

Let me state, by the way, that my trial is over and done with, so this is only for the sake of curiosity. I dont "need" any info; feel free to ignore this discussion if you find it pointless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:57 am 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 354
ahh but this delay will not count to 11b as it will be attributed to you... plus not a grudge but you can bet that the cop will be there for sure

gs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:53 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
you probably know better than me, but it wouldn't make sense or at least it wouldn't be fair to attribute the rescheduling to the defendant if he/she wants a trial and the witness is absent. After all, who's fault is it that the officer is not available?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:13 am 
Offline
Sr. Member

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:31 pm
Posts: 502
aoex wrote:
Quote:
It is not a good idea.

Like OPS said the DA will get a adjournment and you will get no deals.


So you agree with OPS, but can you elaborate on why getting an adjournment is necessarily bad? As I pointed out, a reschedule could be used towards an 11b argument, no? And once again, I ask, will the DA always get an adjournment?

Quote:
Also if you live in the area where the cop patrols you can expect to
get pulled over a lot.


So the officer is going to hold a grudge against me because I made him attend my court appearance and he will haunt me for the rest of my life? ;)

Let me state, by the way, that my trial is over and done with, so this is only for the sake of curiosity. I dont "need" any info; feel free to ignore this discussion if you find it pointless.


I am no expert but I do believe some of the cops take it personal.

Last trial I was at I thought she was gonna cry.

What really happens when you do this is that you demean the word of others.

Part of the bargain is so the cop can leave.

Play the game the way you feel most comfortable.

Cheers
Viper1

_________________
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 3:15 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
Let me clarify again that my trial is over, so I am not really asking for advice. I may have started off the thread giving the wrong impression that I was in court simply to make a deal with the prosecutor, whereas in fact this deal was made right before the trial and I was convicted.

in reply to Viper1:

While it is true that I can fool the prosecutor by accepting a deal and then asking for the witness when I am called to the stand, thus earning the contempt of the opposing party, I could also be more honest and tell the prosecutor "let me think about your offer" and then take a decision on the stand. But the issue still remains that the prosecutor, in my experience, does NOT communicate with any officers after the line-up bargains with the defendants, so it is unclear how they can notify the officers to stay or leave. I understand of course that none of you may know the inner dealings/procedures of prosecutors with respect to their witnesses prior to the trial, but that was the main issue I was targeting with this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:49 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Posts: 2933
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
aoex wrote:
Quote:
It is not a good idea.

Like OPS said the DA will get a adjournment and you will get no deals.


So you agree with OPS, but can you elaborate on why getting an adjournment is necessarily bad? As I pointed out, a reschedule could be used towards an 11b argument, no? And once again, I ask, will the DA always get an adjournment?


I'm not up on the ins/outs of the above stuff. But since a resolution was made, the officer released by prosecutor, then the defendant pulls that stunt is "acting in bad faith", shouldn't 11B then go against defendant?

_________________
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:33 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 2881
Location: Toronto
hwybear wrote:
But since a resolution was made, the officer released by prosecutor, then the defendant pulls that stunt is "acting in bad faith", shouldn't 11B then go against defendant?


Delay should be peremptory on the defendant in that case - so no stay due to 11B available.

_________________
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:58 pm
Posts: 10
Quote:
I'm not up on the ins/outs of the above stuff. But since a resolution was made, the officer released by prosecutor, then the defendant pulls that stunt is "acting in bad faith", shouldn't 11B then go against defendant?


I see what you guys are saying, but I also pointed out (last reply) that the defendant could tell the prosecutor "I'll have to think about your offer" and then make a decision on the stand, thus not acting in bad faith. What do you say to this?

ALSO, this is what really interests me: how does the prosecutor communicate to each officer that he can leave because their respective defendants accepted an offer? (does he have an assistant??)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Related topics
 Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. York Regions Prosecutors Office fax#

Occidio

5

2709

Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 am

Occidio View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Prosecutors are backtracking on disclosure of dash cam video

andyja

1

343

Wed Jun 21, 2017 9:03 am

ynotp View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. disclosure and witnesses

dgs

13

2328

Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:19 pm

dgs View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Retaliation against witnesses

zoink540

2

768

Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:57 pm

pirish View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. No witnesses for FTC trial ?

riggyzomba

5

1194

Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:32 pm

hwybear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What if cop shows up but witnesses don't

jimm

4

485

Thu Sep 01, 2016 5:13 pm

jsherk View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Single Car Collision, No Witnesses = Careless?

Stunderthal

6

1231

Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:12 pm

Radar Identified View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Careless Driving Ticket (No Accident, No Witnesses) 5/15/11

strictbiz

8

1422

Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:00 pm

strictbiz View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Witnesses box not checked - is other driver not a witness?

C_B

1

520

Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:07 pm

Stanton View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Careless Driving - Single Car Collision - No Witnesses

the5191

2

556

Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:24 pm

jsherk View the latest post

 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Web Development & Search Engine Optimization
Home | Court Listings | Ontario Traffic Ticket

Copyright 2007 - 2017 © Microtekblue Inc. Web Development & Search Engine Optimization Service. We Support phpBB All Rights Reserved.