It's one heckuva snow day here in Ottawa, today. Lots of heavy wet snow, poor visibility and slippery roads. Yeesh! But what I don't understand is how many people fail to brush the snow off their cars before heading out on the roads. I see people driving around with their windows completely covered...or big piles of snow on their rooftops, hoods and trunks flying off in the "faces" of all the other vehicles around. Some lazy buggers do nothing more than run the windshield wipers and then drive around with two pie-shaped clean spots to see out of. Obviously those drivers can't see out properly, and it's far from courteous and/or safe for others around them. It's maddening, for sure, but is it illegal? What's the specific section of the HTA that applies? And do the cops ever bother to enforce it? ### I'm talking about something like this:
It's one heckuva snow day here in Ottawa, today. Lots of heavy wet snow, poor visibility and slippery roads. Yeesh!
But what I don't understand is how many people fail to brush the snow off their cars before heading out on the roads.
I see people driving around with their windows completely covered...or big piles of snow on their rooftops, hoods and trunks flying off in the "faces" of all the other vehicles around. Some lazy buggers do nothing more than run the windshield wipers and then drive around with two pie-shaped clean spots to see out of. Obviously those drivers can't see out properly, and it's far from courteous and/or safe for others around them.
It's maddening, for sure, but is it illegal? What's the specific section of the HTA that applies? And do the cops ever bother to enforce it?
Yes, it is illegal. It falls under section 74 of the HTA. So the windshield and windows to either side of the driver must be clear of ice/snow. I would argue that simply running the wipers to clear part of the windshield would not be considered a "clear view". It wouldn't have to be spotless, but the driver should have a relatively clear view. The back window should also be clear, but the last subsection grants an exception if you have side mirrors which can afford a clear view (which I'd say 99% of motor vehicles do). In terms of enforcement, I'd say police certainly do stop the egregious offenders, but you mainly see them on snow days, when police are busy with accidents and don't have a lot of free enforcement time.
Yes, it is illegal. It falls under section 74 of the HTA.
Windows to afford clear view
74. (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle upon a highway,
(a) unless the windshield and the windows on either side of the compartment containing the steering wheel are in such a condition as to afford the driver a clear view to the front and side of the motor vehicle; and
(b) unless the rear window is in such a condition as to afford the driver a clear view to the rear of the motor vehicle. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 74 (1).
Application of cl. (1) (b)
(2) Clause (1) (b) does not apply to a motor vehicle that is equipped with a mirror or mirrors securely attached to the motor vehicle and placed in such a position and maintained in such a condition as to afford the driver, otherwise than through the rear window, a clearly-reflected view of the roadway in the rear or of any vehicle approaching from the rear. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 74 (2).
So the windshield and windows to either side of the driver must be clear of ice/snow. I would argue that simply running the wipers to clear part of the windshield would not be considered a "clear view". It wouldn't have to be spotless, but the driver should have a relatively clear view. The back window should also be clear, but the last subsection grants an exception if you have side mirrors which can afford a clear view (which I'd say 99% of motor vehicles do).
In terms of enforcement, I'd say police certainly do stop the egregious offenders, but you mainly see them on snow days, when police are busy with accidents and don't have a lot of free enforcement time.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
