Just a few quick questions regarding my recent ticket for Failure to Stop Amber. I plan to plead not guilty as the road appeared icy at intersection so I decided to proceed with caution. The officer didn't agree and said the roads were clear and dry. There wasn't much snow that day but it was a mainly sunny day and the temperature dropped significantly after sunset which is when I received my ticket. It was a very cold evening. As I was approaching the intersection, it appeared to me that ice had formed where cars had idled at intersection during the day because sun was now down and the temperature dropped so much. My main question. If I plead not guilty and lose, is there any way that I could received a worse penalty (ie worse than $180 and 3 demerit points)? Also, the intersection it occurred at definitely doesn't have those red light cameras seen in some big cities but there does seem to be some sort of black camera type thing above the stoplight. Is this camera likely just for timing of the crosswalk, lights etc? I'm just wondering if videos are ever used in these cases for evidence? Thanks
Just a few quick questions regarding my recent ticket for Failure to Stop Amber. I plan to plead not guilty as the road appeared icy at intersection so I decided to proceed with caution. The officer didn't agree and said the roads were clear and dry. There wasn't much snow that day but it was a mainly sunny day and the temperature dropped significantly after sunset which is when I received my ticket. It was a very cold evening. As I was approaching the intersection, it appeared to me that ice had formed where cars had idled at intersection during the day because sun was now down and the temperature dropped so much.
My main question. If I plead not guilty and lose, is there any way that I could received a worse penalty (ie worse than $180 and 3 demerit points)? Also, the intersection it occurred at definitely doesn't have those red light cameras seen in some big cities but there does seem to be some sort of black camera type thing above the stoplight. Is this camera likely just for timing of the crosswalk, lights etc? I'm just wondering if videos are ever used in these cases for evidence?
The fine might be worse, but the demerit points and conviction record will not be any worse. Red light cameras are set to photograph drivers who go through the red only. They are triggered by sensor plates embedded in the road - so when the light is red and you go through, it snaps a photo of your vehicle entering on red, and then in the intersection on red. As for your offence, was the officer behind you when he saw you go through? You may be able to testify that the road was too slippery, you were driving at a reasonable speed but, given the conditions, you felt that it was unsafe to attempt to stop so you proceeded with caution. Basically you'd testify that you followed the law (if unable to stop safely, proceed with caution). Since it happened on an amber light, you can make that argument. Whether it would be successful or not is a different story.
The fine might be worse, but the demerit points and conviction record will not be any worse.
Red light cameras are set to photograph drivers who go through the red only. They are triggered by sensor plates embedded in the road - so when the light is red and you go through, it snaps a photo of your vehicle entering on red, and then in the intersection on red.
As for your offence, was the officer behind you when he saw you go through? You may be able to testify that the road was too slippery, you were driving at a reasonable speed but, given the conditions, you felt that it was unsafe to attempt to stop so you proceeded with caution. Basically you'd testify that you followed the law (if unable to stop safely, proceed with caution). Since it happened on an amber light, you can make that argument. Whether it would be successful or not is a different story.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
I realize this may be a difficult question to answer but how much worse, on average, would the fine be if still found guilty? Could it be double for example? Sorry, I'm just trying to decide whether its worth fighting it. The officer was turning right onto the road I was driving so turned right behind me after I went through the intersection and pulled me over. Therefore, I like to think that I have a better judgement of the road conditions on the lane I was on since she never would have actually seen the shiny patch of road that I believe was ice. Although she may have gone back to the intersection afterwards to check it out but I suppose I would get that information if I asked for discovery.
I realize this may be a difficult question to answer but how much worse, on average, would the fine be if still found guilty? Could it be double for example? Sorry, I'm just trying to decide whether its worth fighting it.
The officer was turning right onto the road I was driving so turned right behind me after I went through the intersection and pulled me over. Therefore, I like to think that I have a better judgement of the road conditions on the lane I was on since she never would have actually seen the shiny patch of road that I believe was ice. Although she may have gone back to the intersection afterwards to check it out but I suppose I would get that information if I asked for discovery.
I doubt if it would go double. The total payable for running a red light is $325, so you might be looking at something in the $200 to $250 range if you lose. But, your insurance will probably go up unless you either win, or plea-bargain it down to something less than Disobey Amber Light, so that's something to consider. That's the key thing right there. The officer did not see or experience what you drove over prior to the intersection. If you take it to trial, it will be important to question the officer on this point, and show that she didn't actually drive over the same part of the road that you did.
I doubt if it would go double. The total payable for running a red light is $325, so you might be looking at something in the $200 to $250 range if you lose. But, your insurance will probably go up unless you either win, or plea-bargain it down to something less than Disobey Amber Light, so that's something to consider.
Redman02 wrote:
Therefore, I like to think that I have a better judgement of the road conditions on the lane I was on since she never would have actually seen the shiny patch of road that I believe was ice.
That's the key thing right there. The officer did not see or experience what you drove over prior to the intersection. If you take it to trial, it will be important to question the officer on this point, and show that she didn't actually drive over the same part of the road that you did.
* The above is NOT legal advice. By acting on anything I have said, you assume responsibility for any outcome and consequences. *
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
The other factors to consider are; - what was your speed - what point were you on the road when the light went amber (average perception/reaction is about 1.5seconds) - was there traffic behind you - what kind of lighting there was - where was your vehicle in relation to the intersection when the light went red.. - did you speed up to make the light Frankly if the officer is saying clear and dry and you're saying that there was patches of ice, that will be your biggest hurdle. *** Edit The black things onto of the traffic lights could be for the cross walk, or some municipalities have strobe readers for preemptive light sensors for Firefighters that will change the light cycle in their favour coming to an intersection.
The other factors to consider are;
- what was your speed
- what point were you on the road when the light went amber (average perception/reaction is about 1.5seconds)
- was there traffic behind you
- what kind of lighting there was
- where was your vehicle in relation to the intersection when the light went red..
- did you speed up to make the light
Frankly if the officer is saying clear and dry and you're saying that there was patches of ice, that will be your biggest hurdle.
*** Edit
The black things onto of the traffic lights could be for the cross walk, or some municipalities have strobe readers for preemptive light sensors for Firefighters that will change the light cycle in their favour coming to an intersection.
I got ticket for failing to stop at stop sign in Toronto. i heard that the police officer must see the stop line, if there is one, from where he was sitting. That is exactly my case, Is it a strong case? If so do i need a picture to show that there is a stop line and a picture to show that he could not see the stop line from where he was sitting?
I got a ticket, Disobey stop sign, sec 136.1.a on dec 6th
I made a left in an intersection and was pulled over by a police officer in an unmarked car who had been sitting down the road. A classic fishing hole situation. I was genuinely surprised when he stopped me and told me I went through a stop sign without even slowing down. I know to shut up and be polite and take the ticket. I…
Yesterday morning, I rear-ended someone. I was going the speed limit. The sun was directly in front of me and it blinded my windshield and my eyes. At the same time, the person in front of me stopped/slowed down (also due to the sun). I started to slow down but didn't stop and I hit them since I couldn't see anything. I was not driving too close initially. I…
I was driving in the county at night and hit a limousine stretched out side ways across the road. The limo had its lights on and had side lighting as well. The police officer charged me with careless driving because it was "fully lit up".
It took me to the next day to figure out what had happened - what I remember made no sense. What I had run across was a "false visual reference" illusion.
I was on hwy 37 trying to make my girlfriends ganadmas mass and I live an hour away and I had an hour to get there so I was going fast but not 50 over untill some idiot got on my tail soo close that I was to concentrated on him that I kept going faster untill I got pulled over at 147 on an 80 km hwy.
I alreaddy lost 3 points and this time was just the…
Hello, got stopped today for rolling a stop sign. Ticket says failure to stop, but quotes hta 1361b.
Doesn't 1361b mean failure to yield?
Is this a fatal error? Or could it be amended at trial. How can I prepare a defence if I don't know if I'm defending the failure to stop or the failure to yield?
After he was providing me with a ticket for failure to obey to the stop sign (I am pretty sure I stopped but less than 3 seconds recommended by my driver ed. instructor), I know everybody say that..as an excuse.
Then he stopped me again to return the documents.
Any advice and feed back would be really appreciated.
Can you get evidence for whether someone had an advanced green at an intersection? My dad was making a right turn on a red (after stopping) into a plaza parking lot. He got hit by someone making a left turn from the opposite lane. The driver told the officer called to the collision that he had an advance green. My dad said he came out of nowhere which makes me…
So i was driving on Eglinton Avenue East near Rosemount Ave.
The school bus was on the the curb on the opposite side of the road while i was travelling on the middle lane of the three-laned Eglinton Avenue East (five lanes apart plus a raised median island seperating the traffic)
I could not see the school bus as my view of the bus was being obstructed by the cars in front of me and on my left hand…
Lots of good information on getting disclosure from the Crown here.
Now, I am just wondering if I will be relying upon evidence of my own at trial... do I have to voluntarily send this material to the Crown in a reasonable time before the trial, or only if they request disclosure from me?
This morning I had an exam for university. I was studying the entire night and i wanted to catch like maybe 1-2 hours of sleep before the exam so i went to sleep. I woke up like 5 hrs after and realize that I was about to miss my exam. I still could have made it so I asked my dad for his car since I was in a huge rush and he gave it to me.
I went on the highway and I was going at 135 km/h but…
the police officer was in in the opesite oncumming lane he was fallowing another car so close that i was not even able to see his cruser till he was buy he said that i was going 111 in a 80 he said he hade me on radar he only asked for me drivers licencs and never asked for my insurence so on the ticket there no insurence dose enyone think i can beat this i wana take it to cort becuse he was…
Hi I have a couple questions so I'll explain my situation and any advice would be appreciated.
Can't remember exact date so lets call it some time in 2008 I got a fine for $5000.00 for driving without in insurance. I never paid the fine and in 2012 I was pulled over and the officer asked to see my license. Although I had it on me I figured it would be under suspension for the unpaid fine from…
Alright, so I did something really stupid the other day, I was driving down a country road and wanted to hit the curves so I passed 3 cars at once, inadvertently making it up to very much past 50 over (80 limit)... Much to my chagrin there was a cop coming in the opposite direction who immediately skidded on the gravel shoulder and who I thought was 100% going to turn around and pull me over,…
Anyone know how backed this courthouse is? I submitted my ticket for trial at the end of August, and still no letter. Im scared it got lost in the mail, can i call the courthouse and find out my courtdate? Or would i have to go in personally?
I recently received a ticket for failure to use low beams - while following - Ticket was issued Sec 168 (
- it was on the 401 and no one was within 500 meters of me, I was warning a oncoming vehicle that there was an officer hiding (which is not illegal or I could not find a law against it) it was a police vehicle travelling at very high rate of speed in the opposite direction with no lights on…
I received a warning letter from MTO for a 2pts ticket.What happened is that the police officer issued a "unsafe left turn" and then changed the ticket to "failed to signal" at the scene, but she submitted both tickets!!! And I !!!ONLY!!! received the latter ticket from her(I requested trial for "failed to signal"). I recently received notice from MTO that I'm convicted for "unsafe left turn".
Hello everyone! I was given a ticket for using a hand-held communication device while driving. It was 3 am, I was at a stop light and the cop saw me with the my phone in my hand. I told him i was just checking the time on it. I received the notes a few weeks ago ill copy them down below. Any help is appreciated although i believe there's no hope for me. The cop recorded me saying what phone i…
I got pulled over about 15 or so days ago the court till this date has not received the summons what is the legal time period that the court has to follow to accept the summons from the office court says its 15 days is the legal timeframe the officer has to serve it on the court
I requested for disclosure of information two months ago.
I received the radar manual after one month, but not others (including maintenance/calibration record of the radar, certificate of police training). On further pursuit, the prosecutor told me that he did not have them and he did not see why I needed these documents. He said he did not know where to get them when I asked.
Last Friday I was pulled over by an OPP motorcycle cop who informed me I was going 134. I was on the SB 404, I did see him parked under a bridge and when I passed him he was not on his bike.
I'm hoping to get some insight for a defense in this case.
I was in lane 1 and I had a car in front of me, and a car behind me, also there was a car speeding down Lane 3 passing everyone and moved quickly into…