Ontario Highway Traffic Act

k txs

dashcam ...........

I gotta get me one soon

why oh why oh why do they say that, it's blatantly not true, if I had a $ for every post I saw where an LEO told a motorist "it won't effect your insurance" I'd be rich,

it MAY not, chances are it will, an LEO cannot make that call or give that advise, I wish they would stop.

Apparently I was driving 80 but the officer was nice and reduced it ...

YIKES !
well bringing mrs.bobajob, so hopefully we wount be so screwed ; lolz
txs again bruv

ahh ok cool,
I'm planning on being a good boy anyway......... txs again appreciate it

Good plan........doing something to get your licence seized out of your home area becomes very expensive. I pulled over an American who was traveling far in excess of ...

txs hiway, sentiments exactly,

Of course, this doesn't negate the victim's ability to still sue the 'uninsured' person personally. So, a person could go after the defendant's personal property, assets, and future income including retirement pension income. Its costly litigation but a great way to ensure the selfish fool who chose not to get ...

ahh ok cool,
I'm planning on being a good boy anyway......... txs again appreciate it

do the RLC here flash? in the UK, you get 2 flashes

ok txs, very helpful,

no my car is analog and only marked in km's it does have cruise control, so I can set it in km or mph,
but it doesnt show, only when setting the disappears

6> would they give me a slip or something, as I would need to get home etc, I suppose if I have to surrender here it a lot less of an issue,

txs

1) No
2) Why? If is ...

Planning on going to the US (NY from TO) for about a week, next year;
so some questions and points,

1> Do I need to get special cover from my insurance
2> My car speedo is in KM's , would it help to put a couple of stickers to note where the MPH limits are
3> IF I get a ticket, do I have to go back to NY, to deal with it?
4> If I ignore it can I ...

just wondering, what happens if I get hit or a love one gets killed or maimed or seriously injured, by a person who drives "knowingly" with no insurance, and on a suspended license,

I found a lot of sources on line, for both cases
but I'm sure we can't posts links, nor cut and paste all articles..
anyway the info and stats are on line

The evidence shows that it reduces injury collisions. Just because you repeat the mantra enough that speeding doesn't hurt anyone doesn't make it true. A collision at 60 kms/hr compared to a collision at 30 kms/hr is safer for everyone concerned.

The speed cameras in the UK absolutely have slowed the traffic down which is exactly the result ...

jsherk wrote:Has there been a series of injuries and fatalities in school zones recently that has prompted the cameras? I doubt it!

It's all about income generation... tax the people until they revolt!

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Thank you

source RAC and Daily mail online

"But the RAC Foundation, which carried out the study, believes some of the cameras appear to be causing accidents rather than preventing them.
They have now written to seven local authorities warning them of the 21 suspect cameras their areas.
And they say that, because only a third of speed-camera partnerships ...

sorry not true, 50+ brit here, and that's simply not true
since the introduction of speed cameras, driving is more dangerous,
people speed UP to the camera then slam on there anchors.

speed limits on some spots have "suddenly" changed and cameras put up

it's a taxation for the government, stats have shown, little to no improvement in road safety ...