Search found 888 matches
- Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:42 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Never talk to the police & Know your rights
- Replies: 27
- Views: 12571
Re: Never talk to the police & Know your rights
Not the first time either
- Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:06 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey the directions of a police officer
- Topic: Disobey Officer Traffic on RIDE
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4307
Re: Disobey Officer Traffic on RIDE
If the lights were blue then you should've stopped. If the lights were Amber you could argue that it looked like construction. If you can't remember then you likely weren't paying enough attention.
- Sun Jan 03, 2016 1:19 pm
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: littering ticket
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3087
Re: littering ticket
Does the video show you driving away with the logs still on the road or dud the video guy drive away while you were still working ?
- Sun Jan 03, 2016 7:37 am
- Forum: Stunt Driving
- Topic: pulled over going 166 400 south 17 years old g2
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8505
Re: pulled over going 166 400 south 17 years old g2
I don't know your financial situation but if you get convicted of stunt driving as a G2 you are not going to be able to afford insurance for a long time. $500-$1000 a month probably.
- Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:27 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Section 37(1) - Drivers under 16 prohibited
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3243
Re: Section 37(1) - Drivers under 16 prohibited
Disqualified is different than simply not having a license. Whether the age thing would fall under that definition I doubt but that would be for a crown to argue and a judge to decide.
Personally I'd tell my kid just to wait.
Personally I'd tell my kid just to wait.
- Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Section 37(1) - Drivers under 16 prohibited
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3243
- Thu Dec 24, 2015 4:30 pm
- Forum: Failing to stop for a school bus
- Topic: T Intersection & School Bus
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6875
Re: T Intersection & School Bus
Nope. But it couldn't turn on to road A.
- Tue Dec 22, 2015 2:15 am
- Forum: Improper left turn
- Topic: HIGHWAY TRAFFICE ACT 141 (5)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3643
Re: HIGHWAY TRAFFICE ACT 141 (5)
Select the trial option and ask for disclosure. Then you can see what the evidence is.
- Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:39 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Radar and GPS
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5447
Re: Radar and GPS
Driving is indeed a right, on one's own property. If you choose to drive on public land then you must agree to the public laws.
- Sun Dec 20, 2015 5:33 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Radar and GPS
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5447
Re: Radar and GPS
They are in widespread use in the UK and are an excellent piece of kit. Basically people don't drive with valid registration or annual MOT (safety check) because you will be caught. Makes the roads much safer for me, my family and all road users.
I'd be interested to hear the rationale for why you think it is an infringement on rights, jsherk.
I'd be interested to hear the rationale for why you think it is an infringement on rights, jsherk.
- Sat Dec 19, 2015 7:42 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: No light on bike after dark
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9200
Re: No light on bike after dark
And that is the problem in lots of cases. People find one case law that supports their argument and ignore the dozen case laws that are contrary.
- Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:50 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 29km/hr over reduced to 10km/hr over
- Replies: 26
- Views: 7887
Re: 29km/hr over reduced to 10km/hr over
Yes. This is pretty standard. I had an impaired case where I testified that I was riding double with my partner and he testified we were in separate cruisers. Oops. The accused was still convicted as the rest of the testimony was solid. Just shows that you can't pin your hopes on one small discrepancy being enough to toss the whole case.
- Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:42 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: No light on bike after dark
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9200
Re: No light on bike after dark
You can only play the motion of non suit card after the Crown has tendered all of their witnesses. Once the Crown has concluded their case you can make the motion. I am still having a very hard time with the whole sidewalk not being a part of the highway thing. Even ditches are considered highways if between the property lines, why wouldn't a side ...
- Sat Dec 19, 2015 2:33 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: No light on bike after dark
- Replies: 35
- Views: 9200
Re: No light on bike after dark
A bit of a tangent but this refers back to the other thread about whether or not to speak to the police. Without having been there I would suggest that the OP's friend talked themselves into a ticket here. Sometimes a bit of politeness and civility will result in a warning whereas this alleged behavior will almost always result in paper being laid.
- Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:46 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: truly was not speeding
- Replies: 57
- Views: 17822
Re: truly was not speeding
Absolutely not. Locking in is actually pretty irrelevant. I would testify the speed that I saw being displayed whether or not it was locked. I didn't allow people to come and see the radar because there is no need. To do so they have to get out into traffic and also tactically it would allow for someone who's agitated to take a run at me. I simply ...