Search found 2111 matches

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pgm8I0B8bY[/youtube]

Neat combination of talent and complete lack of talent.

Remember, the standard required is not one of absolute proof.

What about reasonable doubt?

That's the standard of proof required for a conviction, beyond a reasonable doubt. But the fact that there isn't a witness does not automatically mean there's reasonable doubt. Think of the many serious criminal trials for offences like murder where there ...

That would be a decision best left to your lawyer. They can review the evidence and determine the strength of the Crown's case.

The Crown will typically offer plea deals right up to the start of trial. Once the trial starts however you're basically either guilty or not guilty.

I'd disagree with that. There needs to be evidence that it was you driving and that you were driving in a careless fashion, but it doesn't require a witness. While a witness can strengthen the case, evidence can still be obtained through physical evidence at the collision scene or through a statement provided by the accused.

Quite likely the ...

If you decide to plead guilty to something, try and get a charge that is a non-moving violation which won't affect your insurance. No seatbelt as a passenger, red light camera tickets and expensive parking violations like parking in a fire route, in front of a fire hydrant or no stopping or standing charges do not affect your driving record.

The ...

1) If there is a statement from an independent party like the bus driver, that should help your friend.
2) Not the usual practice, but not unheard of either.
3) Yes.
4) Again, a statement from an independent third party should help raise reasonable doubt.

It might not hurt for your friend to simply have a first attendance meeting with the Crown ...

I dont think its at all unreasonable to request more time to review the operators manual. I cant advise though when it would be most advantageous to make such a request.

In regards to the officers U-turn, it probably was unlawful unless there was signage exempting emergency vehicles. That being said, if the turn was made safely (regardless if ...

I'm not aware of any way to avoid the suspension, I believe it's automatic upon conviction.

Speak with the Crown and see if a plea deal to a lesser offence is possible, one that doesn't carry the automatic suspension.

I'm sure the Crown would be willing to offer you a plea deal to a much less serious charge. I'd request a first attendance meeting, see if you like the offer and go from there.

I am under the age of 21 - according to new law i could be looking at a 30 day license suspension and a fine of up to 500.00$ IF CONVICTED.

The police officer didn't say anything about me being convicted or any fines that i would have to pay more then the 150$ license re-in-statement - so does this mean when i go into the MTO that i'm gonna get ...

Im assuming youre asking in regards to your no insurance charge. The HTA grants you six days to register the vehicle upon becoming owner, so I would say registration is not required to show ownership.

That being said, in your particular scenario I think youre going to have an uphill battle convincing everyone that you had lawfully purchased the ...

Failure to report doesn't require the accident to occur on a roadway, it can be anywhere, even private property.

Your chances of fighting the tickets are dependent on the strength of the police evidence, something that can't be judged based just on your post. I'd suggest hiring a paralegal to represent you, as both charges are quite serious.

The 30 day suspension is in addition to the roadside suspension. If you're found guilty, your licence is suspended for another 30 days.

The charge is correct as it's illegal to make a turn from the incorrect lane, regardless if traffic wouldn't let you in.

In terms of demerit points/fine, the only way to see about getting it reduced is to request a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what they offer.

What youre talking about isnt an actual exemption under the HTA, but rather one of the few defences available for an absolute liability offence. A defence of duress however places the onus on the defendant to show they reasonably feared for their life and their actions taken were reasonable. So while the defence is available to the OP, you cant ...

I would say being waved in does not satisfy 139.1, simply because the onus is on you to ensure your actions are safe, not other drivers. Any errors on the police report would not result in the charges being dropped, but may help raise some doubt at trial if there is confusion over vehicle positioning. That being said, regardless if you were struck ...

To appeal a conviction, you need to show some type of error in law at the original trial. Might be best to consult with a paralegal to see if you have grounds to do so. Even if you do it might be hard since so much time has passed. Typically the longer you wait the harder it is.

You'll simply be asked about what happened on the date of the accident. If you wrote a statement, you'll be given an opportunity to read it before the trial to refresh your memory. The Crown will then ask questions about what happened and basically walk you through what happened. Defence will then have an opportunity to cross examine you and ask ...

1) No. You can still be charged.
2) No. They'd obtain a copy of the accident report and bill your insurance company.
3) Very unlikely.
4) I don't see how it benefits you since they already have your information on the accident report. If anything being a jerk to the investigating officer would probably make it more likely he'll try and charge you ...

I don't think anyone here would recommend the tactic of having a friend lie to the Court and say you couldn't make it. First off, there's no guarantee the Court will adjourn the matter. More importantly though, you're friend could get in serious legal trouble if he's caught lying to the Court.

I'd say it's almost guaranteed the Crown will drop it to 29 over or less (3 points) in exchange for a plea deal.

The Financial Services Commission of Ontario has a copy of the latest Ontario Automobile Policy (OAP1) on their site.

Link: http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/en/auto/forms/Documents/OAP-1-Application-and-Endorsement-Forms/1215E.pdf

Have a look at section 2.2 which states you're insured on any new auto as long as you notify your provider within 14 days ...

Checking on your dad would not be justification for speeding in Court.

Pretty much any conviction, regardless of points, can impact your insurance. You'd have to check with your provider to be sure as it varies.

Just to confirm, was she charged with careless or dangerous? Dangerous driving is a criminal offence, typically more serious then careless.

It says subject to section 14, meaning 19 grants the exemption unless 14 is in effect.

I obviously don't know your mom's friend, but I've certainly seen lots of accidents where older people have minor fender benders and aren't aware of the fact. Are you sure the other vehilce was in motion? She might have simply struck it while it was parked.

Yes, the fine should read $260/$325. Your best bet may be to hope a JP notices the error and quashes the ticket. There are some threads that will walk you through the process if they don't.

Also you said your wife doesn't speak English well, so notify the Court that you'll require a translator for the trial.

It would be up to you and your wife to articulate that. You'd have to talk about your speed, road conditions and distance from the stop line.