Search found 1367 matches

http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic4.html

Please read the following post. There is a link in here that might confuse all of us.

Expired sticker is cut and dry. Make sure you get a good job to pay for all those "oversights".

4-series highways, 20 over in the left lane is normal, monday to friday, and moving out of the left lane is the "usual". Saturday and Sunday, WTF. Lets drive whatever speed we want, in whichever lane we want and throw out all the courtesies from the week. I'm willing to put money on the fact that on a per day basis, there are more accidents on the ...

technically, 80 is the limit..........black and white laws enforced in a grey way. I work with a lot of American contractors and always the question is " So, what can I get away with up here". Bears response is in line with what I tell them, but there is no guarantee. I would just like to head out on the roads one day, set the cruise and off to my ...

What time of day did this occur??

That could have implications on the outcome. i.e. riding at night without lights etc.

I believe the older marksman has a beam divergence of 3.5 milliradians.

And the laws of Ontario are clearly written, 1 over = XX$. The laws are there but not used.

I can not directly speak for others on their tolerance per se

So, what is the true limit??????????????

And what about that fellow who got charged with mischief for doing 100 on ...

We are all taught the same material on the use radar/lidar.

I meant as drivers.....

But now that you mention that......the same "incident" I spoke of at the beginning of this thread, I asked the officer how big the lidar beam was at the distance I was measured at. The distance was 431m and my rough calculations make the beam 1.6m in diameter ...

I generally allow up to 20 over.

Is this the case for all officers?????

We are all taught the same

Are we all taught by the same instructor???? When I got my license I did not have to take driver training. I did mind you but what you get out of it is solely upto the instructor. When I took the government exam, we never ever went near the 4 ...

I understand the one at a time stop but, if no one else is stopped eventhough they are above the limit but within a "socially acceptable" tolerance, legally the limit imposed on the road would be the "socially accepted" one.

You as an officer have a direct bearing on the "limit" as it is your discression as to who gets stopped. My main beef about ...

So here you go Bear. The last time I was in court, appeal is pending, the officer mentioned that I was travelling at a marked departure from the other traffic on the road. So, if the only reason I was singled out was due to my relation to other traffic why does the fine and demerit points come down to the base speed of the road. No one else was ...

You know book, that we all must bow to the mighty..............a nice "BS" smiley would go good right here.

I just wore out my mouse wheel........cough.......wheeze....

Just when I thought we got rid of Cam Wooley...............

Certainly if the sign were to say FREE GAS everyone would be obeying that Laughing

All my years of driving and I've yet to see that sign. It could be that I was looking up that phone number while adjusting my tunes on my Ipod, checking my tomtom directions versus my map while putting my change away after stopping for a TIMS......give bear a ...

Unreachable wrote:what the hell does that mean?

It means you're going to take it hard.......unless you get lucky with the JP or prosocutor.............

I think I smell burning rubber and it ain't from no tires.......................

as it should have been dealt internally with this FireFighter.....pretty simple IMO.....copper clocks him, rings up the Fire Chief, allows the return of the vehicle to the Fire Dept and let's the driver deal with his penalty

In this instance I agree. However, what is the charge???????????

Just to lighten the mood on this post..........................


BTW 'bear, love that new avatar........

I say lights on, giver bullets officer. However, if the officer is going "stealth" then there should be limits on their speeds.

Great, now we are going to 'bear doing a Cam Wooley impression........."and they were just going way to fast for the conditions. Everyone needs to slow down out there......"

When are you going to apply for that position????

You are not responsible for someone else's property, it is that simple. Simple question in court: Officer, would you like me to forge my wife's signature?? It would be like driving a friends car and you being charged for them not signing their ownership. This is an example of the system failing it's self.

still meets the definition under what is a stunt

Unfortunately we are nothing but pawns in someones political game. An entire province has changed based on someone wanting to get re-elected and using a half true story to under the guise of safety. I sure am glad Fantino didn't go after 30 over.

50 over is still not a stunt if you are used to it.

Disclosure is very much needed.........(still smacking self)

And I'm here for the donuts................Where are they anyway??

Thats the first time I have wanted to drive a cruiser.......well ok maybe the second.

That was me that invited you.........Bookm did think it was a good idea though.....just for clarity in case I'm ever down your way.

my eye hurt from reading that................

You two seem to have a warm and fuzzy going on. Does this have anything to do with the new appointment????

bu-dum-ching