If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?
Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
We've had some history with the police in my town..
orilliapacket.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2158203
We have a steady police presence of 5 - 10 officers in the town at any given time.
Long story short I exercised my right to not talk to the police (I watch them beat the *EDIT* outta my brother and a…
Just wondering what you guys think of those HOV lanes.
Sure these lanes are faster then usual but i think they present a ton of problems, now the first thing i want to clear up is often we say speed is dangerous. Okay i can believe that depending on the context and situation its used in. But i think…
I heard somewhere that flashing your lights (i.e. clicking your high beams on and off) to warm drivers in the opposite direction of a speed trap is a violation of the highway traffic act.
Is this true ?
I was watching motoring 200X and they spoke about this, and accorinding to them, it is NOT illegal…
Mid July 2012 I was hit at 6pm by a drunk driver. That's when my hubby decided to tell me that he didn't take care of the insurance as he was supposed to. So, I got charged with driving without insurance. Car is in my name.
Inuries were minor - all of us had aches/pains, hubby had seatbelt burn…
Hello I'd like to start by saying what a great site this is!
Back on July 31 2011 me and 7 other friends received speeding tickets for 148km in a 100km zone on motocycles. I received my disclosure on March 2nd and court is on March 14. which isnt alot of time to prepare ![]()
some facts of the case
-They…
Just wondering what this incident means...........
My wife got caught not making a full stop - no contest.
However, also got a "ticket" for failure to surrender card - but she did but it was expired.
She found the good card after that mistake and gave it to the officer.
However she still got a "ticket"…
I got a speeding ticket doing 75 in a 50 zone. There where vehicles all around my vehicle doing about the same speed. The road was 2 lanes in one direction and 2 lanes in the other direction. There was a vehicle beside mine, another behind that vehicle and a vehicle behind me, all moving above the…
Hi all,
Unfortunately I got a "Disobey Sign" ticket tonight in this weather for turning left at a no left turn intersection (Greenwood turning left onto O'Connor) and my question is if it is possible to fight this ticket successfully due to a variety of reasons.
First of all, since visibility was…
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?
Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:Ya no kidding i dont get where People like Fantino seem to think they are over the laws and rights of this own country.However abuses power like that sure as hell does not belong to be the OPP cheif.
Don't worry about him, his day is coming in more ways then one!
and he knows he's trouble!
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/ ... alcomments
tdrive2 wrote:What i am really curious about is once this law is found to be unjust what happens to all those people who got ripped off ?I cant wait the day this law is found unjust.
From what Mr. Newell has told me, after meeting with a Constitutional Lawyer
The bottom line is this challenge would run into six figures if it were handled professionally by a lawyer. If we won, it would be appealed and if we won again, the province would have leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.Allan said the Ontario Government would take the challenge very seriously and take every step to ensure they won.
He also said that a law is the law until it is repealed. But there is no option for giving anyone their money back if the law is struck down. To do so would promote (legal) chaos he said.
When I stated that I believed the law was passed fraudulently, he dismissed that at the outset but the more he heard, the less dismissive he became. He was clearly interested in that aspect of the case despite its seeming inadmissiblitiy
John has a great book out on the STREET RACING LEGISLATION
Canadian ISBN # 978-0-9810028-0-4
If anyone in the GTA wishes borrow a copy to read, PM me!
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
I believe there are fines for up to 59 over. 60 over automatically got you an appointment with the robed ones and you had to explain why you still needed your license. Correct me if I'm wrong anyone.

Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
128.13(3) already provides ample penalties for exceeding the speed limit by over 50 km/hr. 6 points, plus hefty fine, plus massive insurance increase, but no roadside license suspension nor towing the car. Good ol' law that's been replaced by a bad new one.
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:In fact this law lets the real street racers off the ones who should be charged with careless driving, this stunt racing law lets them off easier!.
How do you figure that?
Careless = $325 and 6 points
172 = $2000 and 6 points
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
I think he meant dangerous driving.
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Correct i got the two confused. Thanks reflections.
What is happening with this unconstitutional law is there any active court cases?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
hwybear wrote:tdrive2 wrote:In fact this law lets the real street racers off the ones who should be charged with careless driving, this stunt racing law lets them off easier!.
How do you figure that?
Careless = $325 and 6 points
172 = $2000 and 6 points
OK, give the "racers" 2 charges, Careless and Dangerous. Dangerous is not that hard to prove. We can change the fine structure to suit. For that charge I will support a licence suspension....
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Don't we have something against laying two charges for the same offense? Or is that just in the States?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Squishy wrote:Don't we have something against laying two charges for the same offense? Or is that just in the States?
But there are two offences. One is speeding the other is racing.
If you line up side by side with someone else and proceed to try and beat them to a specific spot that's Dangerous. If you try really hard, i.e. exceeding the speed limit by 50KPH, that would be careless. I would then agree that an officer could take away the drivers' license, but not the car. Slap the dumbdumb ricer, um, I mean racer with 2 charges and watch the occurences of real street racing drop. Just doing 50 over is not racing.