If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?
Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?
Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:
Ya no kidding i dont get where People like Fantino seem to think they are over the laws and rights of this own country.
However abuses power like that sure as hell does not belong to be the OPP cheif.
Don't worry about him, his day is coming in more ways then one!
and he knows he's trouble!
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toronto/story/ ... alcomments
tdrive2 wrote:
What i am really curious about is once this law is found to be unjust what happens to all those people who got ripped off ?
I cant wait the day this law is found unjust.
From what Mr. Newell has told me, after meeting with a Constitutional Lawyer
The bottom line is this challenge would run into six figures if it were handled professionally by a lawyer. If we won, it would be appealed and if we won again, the province would have leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Allan said the Ontario Government would take the challenge very seriously and take every step to ensure they won.
He also said that a law is the law until it is repealed. But there is no option for giving anyone their money back if the law is struck down. To do so would promote (legal) chaos he said.
When I stated that I believed the law was passed fraudulently, he dismissed that at the outset but the more he heard, the less dismissive he became. He was clearly interested in that aspect of the case despite its seeming inadmissiblitiy
John has a great book out on the STREET RACING LEGISLATION
Canadian ISBN # 978-0-9810028-0-4
If anyone in the GTA wishes borrow a copy to read, PM me!
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:
If 172 gets removed does this mean 50 over the speed limit would essentially be removed and the fines or punishment for 49 over would apply to this?
Would this also mean 4 demerit points for the 30 to 49 over would now apply for 50 over?
I believe there are fines for up to 59 over. 60 over automatically got you an appointment with the robed ones and you had to explain why you still needed your license. Correct me if I'm wrong anyone.

Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
128.13(3) already provides ample penalties for exceeding the speed limit by over 50 km/hr. 6 points, plus hefty fine, plus massive insurance increase, but no roadside license suspension nor towing the car. Good ol' law that's been replaced by a bad new one.
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
tdrive2 wrote:
In fact this law lets the real street racers off the ones who should be charged with careless driving, this stunt racing law lets them off easier!.
How do you figure that?
Careless = $325 and 6 points
172 = $2000 and 6 points
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
I think he meant dangerous driving.
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Correct i got the two confused. Thanks reflections.
What is happening with this unconstitutional law is there any active court cases?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
hwybear wrote:
tdrive2 wrote:
In fact this law lets the real street racers off the ones who should be charged with careless driving, this stunt racing law lets them off easier!.
How do you figure that?
Careless = $325 and 6 points
172 = $2000 and 6 points
OK, give the "racers" 2 charges, Careless and Dangerous. Dangerous is not that hard to prove. We can change the fine structure to suit. For that charge I will support a licence suspension....
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Don't we have something against laying two charges for the same offense? Or is that just in the States?
Re: Criminal Code Section 39 re impounding of Car
Squishy wrote:
Don't we have something against laying two charges for the same offense? Or is that just in the States?
But there are two offences. One is speeding the other is racing.
If you line up side by side with someone else and proceed to try and beat them to a specific spot that's Dangerous. If you try really hard, i.e. exceeding the speed limit by 50KPH, that would be careless. I would then agree that an officer could take away the drivers' license, but not the car. Slap the dumbdumb ricer, um, I mean racer with 2 charges and watch the occurences of real street racing drop. Just doing 50 over is not racing.
i lost my license in an accident i had to due my exceeding amount of demerit points. i went to jail and made bail i was put on a curfew of 9am to 9pm stupidly enough i did not follow and i got pulled over for driving with a different cars license plates, no insurance, and violating my curfew... i…
I was charged for disobey sign (no left turn) in a winter noon time around Bay/Edward (the prosecutor/judge said it to be a Absolute liability offences but disobey sign is actually a strict liability offence, right? And I found this: For example, if you made an illegal left-turn where there were…
so got fined with 69km in a 50km, at bottom of hill...didn't even have foot on the gas. first ticket ever in over 10 years of driving. fine was 62$ and 3 points.
cop says take to court and get demerit points reduced. didn't even let me speak and walks away.
what to do>? most everyone goes 20km…
On my way to work today I got a 110 dollar ticket + 2 demerit points.
I was driving north on Bathurst and turned left onto a side street into a residential area before hitting the lights at Eglinton and Bathurst. I normally do this to avoid the big line up to turn left onto Eglinton.
I've been doing…
I need some help guys.
On the 400 extension EB towards Barrie cops like to hide out under an over pass that is Ski Trails Rd. They tag people as the come over the crest of the hill and that is 900m from where this officer was standing.
I'm confused because I knew this, saw the cop, and checked my…
I was making a left hand legal turn on a green light, a driver came through the lane I was supposed to be going into ran the red and hit me head on as I was turning into my lane. When the officer came he was telling me that I was racing and driving recklessly because apparently there was reports of…
I got two tickets first for improper left turn and second I was not able to find the owner's title of the car.
I took the left turn from the lane that was supposed to go straight or right (NO signs though). One lane for Left and other for straight or right.
Straight lane was going into a private…
Today i got caught doing 115 in a 90 at Mayfield and 410 and what I have been reading is that this offence is 3 points. Seeing this is my first offence I'm unsure if the ticket is supposed to I lost 3 points or is that just automatic. Also should I go to fight it to drop the points and just pay the…
Hi all,
I was (recently) involved in a traffic accident where, due to icy road conditions, I slid into oncoming traffic while making a right turn, while they were coming towards me and stopping at a stop sign. This was a residential area and there's no way I was exceeding anything over 20KM/h on…
hmmm, wondering if someone can give us a bit of info/advise
there's a car that's been parking on the road near my house, 1 door down,
usually on the road and not on the driveway, most of the day and all night,
as per "On-Street Parking: Parking on City streets is limited to three hours, unless…