I'm assuming this was recent. Stunt driving today is not the same as it was just some months ago. The laws have changed recently. Administrative (roadside) suspension has increased from 7 days to 30 days. Impound increased from 7 days to 14 days. The biggest issue back then was insurance. Automatic 100% increase if they don't boot you first. The biggest issue today would probably be the mandatory license suspension of a minimum of one year (maximum 3). The potential jailtime isn't really a thing. It's there for the guy who has an extensive history of the same or similarly egregious convictions who simply doesn't care. It's not for the first time offender. These penalties are new, so I don't have any idea of what kind of offers are being dished out these days. Back then, you'd pray for a reduced charge of speeding 49km. That was a steal. You'd avoid most of the insurance implications as speeding 49 is pretty much treated the same as any other speeding charge less than that. Sometimes you'd hear people being offered speeding 50+ instead of stunt, but you'd only really be avoiding the increased fine because your provider doesn't care if it's stunt or speeding 50+. They are essentially treated the same by insurance. Not really a great deal for the time. Today, who knows. That minimum 1 year suspension really changes things. Suddenly speeding 50+ doesn't sound so bad even if you have to settle for a high risk insurance provider. At least you'd be driving, if you could afford it. An offer of speeding 49km would be the gift of gifts. Personally, I wouldn't think twice if it was offered, more so today than ever. Whether that's a possibility largely depends on how close to 50 you were.
I'm assuming this was recent.
Stunt driving today is not the same as it was just some months ago. The laws have changed recently.
Administrative (roadside) suspension has increased from 7 days to 30 days.
Impound increased from 7 days to 14 days.
The biggest issue back then was insurance. Automatic 100% increase if they don't boot you first.
The biggest issue today would probably be the mandatory license suspension of a minimum of one year (maximum 3).
The potential jailtime isn't really a thing. It's there for the guy who has an extensive history of the same or similarly egregious convictions who simply doesn't care. It's not for the first time offender.
These penalties are new, so I don't have any idea of what kind of offers are being dished out these days.
Back then, you'd pray for a reduced charge of speeding 49km. That was a steal. You'd avoid most of the insurance implications as speeding 49 is pretty much treated the same as any other speeding charge less than that.
Sometimes you'd hear people being offered speeding 50+ instead of stunt, but you'd only really be avoiding the increased fine because your provider doesn't care if it's stunt or speeding 50+. They are essentially treated the same by insurance. Not really a great deal for the time.
Today, who knows. That minimum 1 year suspension really changes things. Suddenly speeding 50+ doesn't sound so bad even if you have to settle for a high risk insurance provider. At least you'd be driving, if you could afford it.
An offer of speeding 49km would be the gift of gifts. Personally, I wouldn't think twice if it was offered, more so today than ever. Whether that's a possibility largely depends on how close to 50 you were.