I think that this is what the cop wanted. You take the ticket to court, one gets dropped, but not the other.
This is likely what the crown will offer you on FA meeting.
Search found 905 matches
- Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:42 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Child Car seat- Which Offence
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2300
- Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:33 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do you think this is a good try?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3838
Re: Do you think this is a good try?
I'd try to ask for stay due to improper disclosure. Then the crown will try to adjourn, then you say that that is impossible due to 11B argument - too long since the alleged offence took place, and the fact that you have suffered enough financially by taking off one day of work. Taking off a second day would cause even more financial discomfort.
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:43 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: OOps! The police officer forgot to return my documents...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2578
Re: OOps! The police officer forgot to return my documents...
There is always a chance that you win the ticket. If you have a just cause, your chances are higher. If you know what to do, they are higher still.
You can always start by checking the ticket for obvious errors. Some errors are fatal, some not. Then you can send in the ticket with "Option 3 - trial" checked off ("Officer present" too). After that ...
You can always start by checking the ticket for obvious errors. Some errors are fatal, some not. Then you can send in the ticket with "Option 3 - trial" checked off ("Officer present" too). After that ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:30 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: No Side Mirror = Possible Ticket?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 38949
Re: No Side Mirror = Possible Ticket?
Snowplow? Where's snow already?
Not sure about the NY, but in Ontario...
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic712.html
Windows
to afford clear view
74. (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle upon a highway,
(a) unless the windshield
and the windows on either side of the compartment containing the steering wheel are in such a ...
Not sure about the NY, but in Ontario...
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic712.html
Windows
to afford clear view
74. (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle upon a highway,
(a) unless the windshield
and the windows on either side of the compartment containing the steering wheel are in such a ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: Failing to slow and carefully pass a stopped emergency vehicle
- Topic: Cop did not change lane for another emergency vehicle
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11087
Re: Cop did not change lane for another emergency vehicle
This is a clear-as-mud portion of legalese. Yes, the police must obey all rules of the road. However, they may disregard them in "lawful execution of their duties". So go figure.
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:33 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do you think this is a good try?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3838
Re: Do you think this is a good try?
You can apply for a stay and back it up with saying that the disclosure is unreadable, and there was plenty of time to send you proper paperwork, since the 1-st request was sent out in April. Had it been submitted on time, you would have had more time to prepare, request new disclosure. Crown will try to reschedule, that is where you play the 11B ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:25 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: OOps! The police officer forgot to return my documents...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2578
Re: OOps! The police officer forgot to return my documents...
What were you charged with again? Were you charged with "Fail to stop at a stop sign" or "Disobey signs"? Look at the subsection you were charged under, ie 182 (2), and look it up in our "Demerit Points System Table"
Use "Ctrl+F" (inline search function on most browsers) to save time.
Use "Ctrl+F" (inline search function on most browsers) to save time.
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:00 am
- Forum: Prohibited turns
- Topic: Prohibited Contrary turn at intersection - 144 ( 9 )
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2393
Re: Prohibited Contrary turn at intersection - 144 ( 9 )
I would definitely prepare myself too. TO is extreme case.admin wrote:I would not really count on that tho, just in case the other 50% comes true.racer wrote:Esp. in TO, the chances of cop no-show is almost 50% we hear.
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:57 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Pacing
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2592
Re: Pacing
Not sure about pacing. You can, of course, ask for speedometer calibration records in disclosure, and, if performed too long ago, argue that it might be incorrect.
Radar can be used for both oncoming and same direction traffic.
Radar can be used for both oncoming and same direction traffic.
- Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:54 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Renfrew County 46 over
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2863
Re: Renfrew County 46 over
No, it should come in the mail. You should also specify for a mail-in of the package.
- Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:46 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do you think this is a good try?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3838
Re: Do you think this is a good try?
What else did you request? List anything that is missing. Then make a compelling case for unusable disclosure.
Wow, this is almost 10 months after you received the infraction notice. You have a good chance to get it stayed if you can prove disclosure is improper, using 11B argument.
Wow, this is almost 10 months after you received the infraction notice. You have a good chance to get it stayed if you can prove disclosure is improper, using 11B argument.
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Unnecessary Noise
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2861
Re: Unnecessary Noise
The K or the W? They have different by-laws.
City of Waterloo:
http://www.city.waterloo.on.ca/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/LIBRARY_BYLAWS_documents/1978_079Nois.pdf
http://www.city.waterloo.on.ca/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/LIBRARY_BYLAWS_documents/1986_75NOI2.pdf
Kitchener:
http://code.municipalworld.com ...
City of Waterloo:
http://www.city.waterloo.on.ca/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/LIBRARY_BYLAWS_documents/1978_079Nois.pdf
http://www.city.waterloo.on.ca/Portals/57ad7180-c5e7-49f5-b282-c6475cdb7ee7/LIBRARY_BYLAWS_documents/1986_75NOI2.pdf
Kitchener:
http://code.municipalworld.com ...
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:25 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Can't read the handwrittings on disclosure form
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1832
Re: Can't read the handwrittings on disclosure form
Please try not to re-post. Keeping your thread well organized helps us help you fight the ticket, as well as to future readers who go through the same procedure.
Please follow the original thread here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic676.html
Posting in an old thread bumps the thread up. There is no need to make a fresh post.
Locked
Please follow the original thread here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic676.html
Posting in an old thread bumps the thread up. There is no need to make a fresh post.
Locked
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:24 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do you think this is a good try?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3838
Re: Do you think this is a good try?
Moved to here:
Were there any other pieces of information missing from disclosure that you requested?
I'd try another request, and specify "Typed Version of Officer's Notes".ohtat wrote:I received the disclosure form, however the handwritting is too hard to recoganize it. What should I do next? Much thanks.
Were there any other pieces of information missing from disclosure that you requested?
- Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:20 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Careless driving why me?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15162
Re: Careless driving why me?
OK, so the discussion about severity of tickets got in the way of the actual matter here :shock: :roll:. This is no laughing matter either.
You basically need to go through the trial request and disclosure request procedures. First one is easy - you file the ticket with Option 3 checked off. That will at least take you somewhere. In the meantime ...
You basically need to go through the trial request and disclosure request procedures. First one is easy - you file the ticket with Option 3 checked off. That will at least take you somewhere. In the meantime ...