Search found 566 matches

witnesses in car's "generally" don't matter you would need an independent one
and LEO's are NOT supposed to tell you ever not to go to court, it is your absolute right, to contest anything in court.
wether she cut you a break or not, she can not tell you this. If there is a fatal flaw somewhere, or a screwup in court for example you could get lucky ...

HI Guy's long time.

This is about mrs.bobajob

Long story short.
She didnt pay a ticket/ did contest it
Got a letter in the post (from friday dated 21st) saying her license is suspended "do not driva yada yada yada"

OK so she's gone on line, to pay all the fines, it says if we go to a court it takes 4-5 days to sort out
if we pay on line ...

have 2 words for you

DASH CAM

Reading so many "he said - she said" threads on here I had one fitted,
But for your case... good luck, do come back and tell us the outcome !

DUDE this exact thing happened to me.

Now in my case, YES i was speeding, actually I was lane changing as I was late for work.
the LEO told me I was doing 149, now then (years ago) my 12yr POS Neon weaving in and out of traffic was no-where NEAR that,
when he got behind my and I saw him, my speed was a little over 120.

I didnt admit to speeding ...

All the advise is good,

I'm just adding that you DID NOT see a big yellow object ? and a school bus to boot.
What was the kind of conditions where you driving in? IN thick fog and snow I've never failed to see a school bus ever.
If the conditions where that bad, it's not even worth driving in it.
Was it stopped, no lights, where kids coming on or ...

Thats what I though Argyll,
txs

argyll wrote:I don't see an issue. Traffic matters are more focused on what happens as opposed to when. You can always explain things like this in testimony.

anyone ?

txs

Hi guy's

I just had my dashcam fitted. Thinkware F50, nice jobbie

But for some reason, the time stamp is 10 minutes out, so when it says 10:10am it is actually 10:00am
Now I am looking into it but could this present a problem if I had to show a clip in court,

Could a prosecutor or judge throw it out stating the time was wrong, not sure how they ...

just to reiterate what jsherk has said,
I've seen a few threads on this, if you "speed" to overtake your still speeding.

a trick to spotting unmarked

* They are almost always GM's
* Chargers
* Any colour
* on the back they have 3 (I think they are antennas) 1 in the middle which is about 4" and looks like a mobile aerial 2 either side, small ...

personally,
all important cards, docs, which need renewing, I have on a sheet of paper near my calendar, when they are due, when they are expiring
I know "exactly" when to get them and or chase,
if a piece of ID is important enough to stop you getting, medical treatment , driving legally, then it's important enough for you to make sure you have it ...

hey man, txs for that !

To me, it should be a fatal error. It should be obvious it's HTA (which is often abbreviated exactly like that on tickets), but a ticket must specify in sufficient detail the offence that was (alleged to have been) committed. For people who are familiar with the system, that's easy. But for someone who may be unfamiliar with the system or Ontario ...

don't believe that is a fatal, but someone with a bit more experience will be along to confirm or deny
but fingers crossed, good luck,
it does mention section 28...

that is also true,
mind you I'm using the cam for traffic incidents mainly, but good points

jsherk wrote:Then how can you record the actual interaction while pulled over?
Again in my opinion it is just best to not mention it.

anytime you get a ticket at that time of the night is a few reasons

1 (most likely) a complaint was rung in
2 they do roving patrols,
3 (if a complaint has been made) usually they book everyone on the street

I used to do a late night shift, a couple of times I've parked up at 2am in the morning and get a ticket (apparently) left at 4am

stranger things have happened, if you believe youtube

mind you, the f50 has a removable sim card, so I could pull it just after I've been stopped ;)

What about this scenario:

Driver: "I have recorded this on dash cam."
Officer: "Nice dash cam you have there. Looks like a radar detector to me."

Then they "accidentally" delete the video before ...

ahhh yes correct they do, I would probably remove that functionality, or if not,
get a different one.

I'm actually looking at the Thinkware F50

Personally I would not tell them I was recording anything.

As a side note, some dashcams can display information on the recording like vehicle speed. Unless you routinely drive at or under the speed ...

Sometimes you win
Sometimes you loose
Sometimes you draw

But the odds are against you the "house" always wins

Ok guys, Update here.

Had my trial yesterday. Spoke with the prosecutor before hand, I told her I was ready to proceed, and she said she was as well, and didn't want to offer me a deal. Officer was in attendence. There were 10 careless charges on the docket, most of them plead guilty to either "Unsafe Lane Change" or "Improper Left/Right Turn ...

OTD Legal wrote: It is an unfortunately common experience to see self-represented defendants at court either accepting poor resolution offers or proceeding to trial and being convicted due to a poorly run defence.

^^^ this

You don't do brain surgery on your friends and family NOR yourself, you get a trained surgeon to do it for you.

argyll wrote:If it were for a highway traffic matter I can't imagine a JP being at all happy with a copper taking a dash cam. If it were something criminal, dangerous driving causing death for example, then the evidential value would be there to justify doing so.

txs bud

Txs for the prompt reply, some good points.

I'm thinking in an obvious issue, where you could tell (lets give an example) stop sign, you know you stopped, leo says you didnt
(There was an actual thread on this one) I could say, "with all due respect I did stop I have it on dash cam would you like to see it?"
It would save me having to go to court ...

HI guy's 2 questions:

1> I'm going to get a dashcam installed (behind the mirror) discretely.
If there is an issue with an LEO, if I say "I have it all on dashcam" can the leo confiscate it or the sim card under grounds of evidence, (I'm thinking to protect himself)
or should I keep "schtum" and produce said evidence at court, I'm thinking if its ...

SLIM BLACK DEVICE – LOOKS LIKE SMART PHONE TYPE DEVICE
HOLDING UP TO FACE – JUST LEFT BETWEEN FACE AND WINDOW

and

WHEN I RETURN TO CAR WITH POT DRIVER HAS SAME DEVICE IN HANDS
SEARCHING FOR INFO ON HIS INSURANCE POLICY
BLACK, SLIM DEVICE – TOUCH SCREEN

not sure what other thing you can possibly have which you would hold up to your face ...

yes contrary to what people think , you are in fact guilty and have to prove otherwise.

pity thinks nowadays are so much harder.

Was a time when criminals wore stripe suits a black mask and had a bag marked SWAG
so much more harder to target criminals

LOLZ

jac02010 wrote:"always thinking everyone is guilty until proven innocent.

so what EVER the road you are on has a speed limit on it.

we'll say 70 you should be doing NO MORE than 70, if the road transitions to a lower speed limit. Say 60
you usually get a sign saying 60 ahead or 60 begins. By the time you hit the the 60 begins, you must not be doing more than 60

so it AFAIK it doesnt matter wear the LEO is, it depends ...

My common sense is the following

I would be polite and explain to the police officer what happened, without being smart, evasive or give them an opportunity to think negatively.

that said IMHO has a 50/50

1> Cop assists and I'm on my way
2> Cop hands me a ticket

I've had 2 positive interactions with cops
1 traffic ticket I could not talk myself ...

are we:

1 Talking hypothetically
and
2 what did you say to the "hypothetical" Police Officer

my GPS, is mounted onto the screen,
occasionally I have to touch the screen (single press) to increase the volume, or choose a different route
I wonder if I could get a ticket for that ?

did OP have the GPS in a secure mount, or was it in his hand ?