Search found 2111 matches
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:15 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Help with my careless driving charge?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10079
Re: Help with my careless driving charge?
As others have mentioned above, it's a difficult charge to prove, but based on your explanation of the situation, I wouldn't say the charge is completely without merit. Plead guilty to the lesser offence, and you'll have what's commonly considered a minor offence on your record, with typically minor insurance implications. Risk going to trial and ...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:44 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Use plate not authorized for vehicle
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9020
Re: Use plate not authorized for vehicle
While I obviously can't give you a guarantee, from my experience the Crown rarely seeks more than the minimal fine on a first conviction. If you're able to show that you've corrected everything and agree to plead guilty it's even more likely.
Before the Justice of the Peace hands down his sentence, you'll be given the opportunity to provide input ...
Before the Justice of the Peace hands down his sentence, you'll be given the opportunity to provide input ...
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:29 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: How do I know if cop is there
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1292
Re: How do I know if cop is there
If you don't recall what he looks like, you could check with the Crown or even approach another officer and ask.
- Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:28 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Speeding ticket, need a little advice.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1988
Re: Speeding ticket, need a little advice.
I was wondering if I could some how get it taken off my record so my insurance company doesn't rob me blind. If not, do I have any other options?
Once you're convicted of the offence, it will appear on your record. There really isn't any way of removing them from your record except time.
That being said, ten over is likely considered a minor ...
Once you're convicted of the offence, it will appear on your record. There really isn't any way of removing them from your record except time.
That being said, ten over is likely considered a minor ...
- Sun Feb 27, 2011 4:30 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Use plate not authorized for vehicle
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9020
Re: Use plate not authorized for vehicle
The punishment for the offence is as follows:
...a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or to both, and in addition the persons licence or permit may be suspended for not more than six months.
If this is your first conviction and the circumstances are as you described, then you ...
...a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or to both, and in addition the persons licence or permit may be suspended for not more than six months.
If this is your first conviction and the circumstances are as you described, then you ...
- Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:54 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Failure to stop at red light
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3154
Re: Failure to stop at red light
Failure to stop at a red light is what's known as an absolute liability offence, meaning you can't really use slippery roads as an excuse.
The officer was probably suggesting you request a first attendance meeting with the Crown. The Crown will sometimes offer a lesser fine/charge (sometimes with no demerit points) if you agree to plead guilty ...
The officer was probably suggesting you request a first attendance meeting with the Crown. The Crown will sometimes offer a lesser fine/charge (sometimes with no demerit points) if you agree to plead guilty ...
- Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:17 pm
- Forum: Driving While Suspended
- Topic: Court Date Tomorrow Need Advice...Suspended unpaid fine
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6422
Re: Court Date Tomorrow Need Advice...Suspended unpaid fine
What Court were you at? I have never heard of Duty Counsel being present for Provincial matters with the exception of family law.
- Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:08 pm
- Forum: Driving or operating a vehicle on a closed road
- Topic: Crossing a closed road
- Replies: 6
- Views: 17637
Re: Crossing a closed road
This is the actual section from the Highway Traffic Act:
Highway closing
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a police officer may close a highway or any part thereof to vehicles by posting or causing to be posted signs to that effect, or placing or causing to be placed traffic control devices as prescribed in the regulations.
Driving on ...
Highway closing
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a police officer may close a highway or any part thereof to vehicles by posting or causing to be posted signs to that effect, or placing or causing to be placed traffic control devices as prescribed in the regulations.
Driving on ...
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:21 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: Summons for Careless Driving!! Please Help!!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5384
Re: Summons for Careless Driving!! Please Help!!
You can try to blame the accident on the weather, but you have to show that you were driving with due diligence for the conditions. If you hit a hidden patch of ice, or there was a sudden downpour of freezing rain, you might have an argument. When the weather has been poor all day, you're aware of it and strike another vehicle that was able to stop ...
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:25 am
- Forum: Driving While Suspended
- Topic: Court Date Tomorrow Need Advice...Suspended unpaid fine
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6422
Re: Court Date Tomorrow Need Advice...Suspended unpaid fine
Duty Counsel is not available in Provincial Offences Court. You could contact legal aid, but I don't believe you're eligible for any type of subsidised representation with Provincial offences.
The fact that you're dealt with your suspension and expired validation works in your favour, but the Crown is still under no obligation to reduce the charge ...
The fact that you're dealt with your suspension and expired validation works in your favour, but the Crown is still under no obligation to reduce the charge ...
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:21 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: 68 in a 50 zone
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1929
Re: 68 in a 50 zone
Speeding is an absolute liability offence, meaning why you committed the offence is pretty much irrelevant.TorontoGuy24 wrote:Any good excuses?
If you're worried about points, request a first attendance meeting with the Crown. I'm quite sure they'd be willing to reduce it to 15 over with a guilty plea, meaning you'd have no points.
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:13 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Ticketed 131 in 100 zone
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3787
Re: Ticketed 131 in 100 zone
The police officer will not be there for a first attendance meeting. Try not to lose sleep, it's in the Crown's best interest to seek a resolution with you as well.
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:50 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Re-Opening after guilty plea?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2336
Re: Re-Opening after guilty plea?
Charges do not automatically get dropped just because the officer is not in attendance. In some busy jurisdictions JP's frequenly do dismiss minor HTA tickets if the Crown can't proceed, but it varies from one case to the next. The other option is you can seek an 11b motion if it's taken too long for your matter to get to trial, but that again ...
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:49 am
- Forum: Failing to move, where possible, into another lane when passing a stopped emergency vehicle
- Topic: Failure to pull over
- Replies: 22
- Views: 12300
Re: Failure to pull over
Well, you did commit the offence, but I don't believe it's an absolute liability offence. That means if you can honestly show you failed to act because you felt pulling over would cause an accident, you have a possible defence.
Can't really give you odds of success, because that depends on the Crown's evidence and how well everyone presents their ...
Can't really give you odds of success, because that depends on the Crown's evidence and how well everyone presents their ...
- Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:01 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Fatal Error on Summons?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 11705
Re: Fatal Error on Summons?
On your first Court date an information (a document listing the charges) will be read out, and entered on record. The officer who charged you is responsible for generating the document and forwarding it to the Courts. It's basically just a formal document that list the name of the accused, the charge wordings and section.