Ontario Highway Traffic Act

It would be somewhat dependent on the signage. If the turn lane simply has arrows painted on the ground, it has little meaning. If there are actual signs indicating the lane is for left turns only, then a passing maneuver would likely be illegal. It would also be somewhat dependent on the actions of the driver who stopped to let you in, and if they ...

1) Most Provincial charges need to be laid within six months of the offence. I'm not sure if that means to the day, or just by the end of the month. Obviously if yours falls outside that window it's an easy dismissal for you.

2) Regular tickets need to be served within 30 days of the offence, hence why they're proceeding by summons. It doesn't ...

If you weren't stopped by police at the time of the offence, it's unlikely you'll be charged as the driver, since that would require you being identified. More likely if they recorded your plate the registered owner of the vehicle will be charged. If you're charged as the registered owner, there are no demerit points. You'll also likely receive the ...

1) In Ontario, insurance companies classify offences as minor, major or serious. Any charge, be it an unsigned document or speeding offence, can raise your rates.
2) Possibly. While both are likely minor offences, two could result in a minor increase (rough guess 10%).
3) Not possible
4) Your best bet is to contact your provider and ask directly ...

I can't help but think that this charge will be dismissed if I can effectively demonstrate that the officer's actions were substantially more dangerous than mine. Thoughts?

Absolutely not, the officers actions have no bearing on your speeding charge. You'll have to fight the speeding/stunt charge on the strength of the evidence and/or seek a ...

1) No, there is no charter violation whatsoever.

2) There would certainly be nothing wrong with pursuing the matter. At the very least you're likely to get a plea deal to a lesser speed/fine. If you feel the disclosure doesn't accurately cover the issues you've raised, it may be worth going to trial.

3) Don't know, but the actual laser model ...

No, unless there is a median the traffic should be stopping. The number of lanes is irrelevant.

as i have a BC license and the points will not be applied as its out of province. its just the principal of the thing, i dont think i was doing the 140 period.

I would confirm that with the BC ministry that looks after licencing. The Canada Driver Licence Compact states that all Provinces are to exchange conviction information and apply ...

1) Any conviction can impact insurance rates, check with your provider to find out. It would be a minor conviction, so a rate increase should be minimal if any.

2) The Justice of the Peace can't withdraw the charge, he can only find you guilty or not guilty. Only the Crown can withdraw the charge. The JP can however offer you a reduced fine for ...

The fact that an act states you must carry the document is sufficient to indicate it must be original. When copies are allowed, the act will spell out these exemptions.

In terms of specifics, looks at the definitions at the start of Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act. The act states you must carry an insurance card, and defines an insurance card ...

Ok, I think I understand what you're asking. You could certainly confirm with the officer that he obtained the model year for your vehicle from the ownership (which is standard practice). I wouldn't say it's a big help in your case though.

I think you got a pretty good break at the side of the road since you weren't charged with driving under suspension. I doubt the Crown will offer any further deals.

I don't think blaming Canada Post will be all that successful. You still have to explain why you didn't pay your fine and how you'd be reasonably unaware of your suspension.

The compulsory automobile insurance act simply states that you must surrender the insurance card, there is no option for a "true copy" like with the vehicle ownership. I've always understood this to mean you must surrender the original document.

As for Court, assuming you were charged with not having proof of insurance, you can't show that it was ...

Guys, exit question before tomorrow court.
The officer's note saying Toyota 2006. The year is correct, but the model is really 2003. So, the note is apparently made after I was stopped and documents are checked (with the after the fact knowledge). Can I argue with this evidence? As it is based on the past knowledge and proves only the fact of ...

The MTO won't wave the suspension unless it was given in error, which doesn't apply in your case. The Courts however are understanding that a licence is often required to earn an income and will offer payment plans. Just attend your local courthouse and ask them how to go about the process. Once you're on the plan, you can get your licence back ...