Ontario Highway Traffic Act

No worries. I can fold the screen in if that's the issue. I don't play with it while driving (no need really). Just hit record when I start the car. I highly doubt the gadget law will affect dash cams. If it does, I'll find a way around it.

Reflections wrote:Did you enter the courtroom with your CWD jacket on???? "

Definitely wasn't me, LOL. I stayed well clear and let the paid pro handle this one, hehe!

Won't happen to me. If someone lane/brake checks me, I'll have all to evidence I need ;)

http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/7513/cam003anj8.jpg

I picked up this small, digital mini-cam on sale for $150. I put a $35 8-gig card in it (good for 1-hour HD recording) and an AC adapter to the cigarette lighter. A little Velcro and I'm good to go ...

Our oldest boy faced this exact same scenario a few months back. Because it was his first HTA offense AND it is a very serious charge, we decided to pay the $400 to hire a paralegal. The Crown would have to call both the officer and the victim to the stand to successfully win a conviction. Neither showed on the court date and the careless charge ...

That's one heck of a comma! If you are right, then basically the definition of a stunt is anyone driving without consideration to other drivers. That basically takes out every driver in TO. Hey, maybe that was Fantino's plan all along: revenge for TO firing his a$$!

It really just illustrates how difficult it is for the average citizen to know ...

I ain't no English professor (hehe), but I believe the " By " being on the left of the comma restricts subsections i to iv to "[C]" only. If the " By " had been on the right of the comma, [A], AND [C] would have been associated to subsections i to iv.

I think it could be argued that the officer's conduct would fall under . Sure it would be a ...

Lucky @$#*!!

Definition, "stunt"
8. Driving a motor vehicle without due care and attention, without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway or in a manner that may endanger any person by,

Lack of consideration for others.......hhhhmmmmmmm
:evil:

Naw... Reflections nailed it! The word "or" breaks this sentence into 3 separate ...

I do not know that. I have heard the usual going with "the flow" blah blah blah defence heard in court thou, with a conviction still at the clocked speed. JP basically indicated that just b/c someone does "X" speed unlawfully does not make it lawful for anyone else to drive at that speed .

Seemed to be quite acceptable for THIS guy ;)

So the ...

Uh-Oh! Maybe my mug-shot's up on the wall at the station, LOL!!

In order to affect the points, the charge has to be changed. This happens all the time. It's normal court procedure.

I don't know how ALL insurance companies operate, but in my case, I got three tickets in one stop. I called my insurance agent and asked if one "roll stop sign" ticket would be a problem. No increase for one. What about two? That's ...

But it doesn't say that. Surely you're not suggesting this section of the Act isn't worded clearly enough

And the turkey blockin' the left lane gets positive reinforcement for his pathetic lane etiquette. Fantino has this Province SOOOO screwed up!

Call the Prosecutor at the court shown on the back of the ticket. Tell him your story and ask if, in order to avoid a trial, he would consider a plea bargain to a lesser charge (maybe "disobey sign" = 2 ...

Sounds to me like her was performing a "stunt" and should have his license yanked for a week!

Definition, "stunt"
8. Driving a motor vehicle without due care and attention, without reasonable consideration for other persons using the highway or in a manner that may endanger any person by,

i. driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an ...

Close! But no... Canada's Worst Driver