Hi all... Was stopped for speeding. Officer put 95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone.... but failed to put in the section information - it was left out. Will that amount to a "law doesn't exist" fatal error? I asked because I cannot find "95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone" in the HTA.... Yes, it was reduced, but the officer didn't put the "r" in the proper section either... I don't think the officer had his radar on PERIOD.... I was on a motorcycle and when I looked in the window, there was nothing on the radar output..... Anyway.... Cop was cool, but that doesn't stop me from asking the question... Thanks in advance.
Hi all...
Was stopped for speeding. Officer put 95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone.... but failed to put in the section information - it was left out. Will that amount to a "law doesn't exist" fatal error? I asked because I cannot find "95kmh in a posted 80kmh zone" in the HTA....
Yes, it was reduced, but the officer didn't put the "r" in the proper section either... I don't think the officer had his radar on PERIOD.... I was on a motorcycle and when I looked in the window, there was nothing on the radar output..... Anyway.... Cop was cool, but that doesn't stop me from asking the question...
Does the missing section # severely prejudice your ability to make a proper defence to the charge? I would suggest it does since it prevents you from looking up the section #. If it severely prejudices your ability to make a proper defence it should be considered a fatal error.
Does the missing section # severely prejudice your ability to make a proper defence to the charge? I would suggest it does since it prevents you from looking up the section #. If it severely prejudices your ability to make a proper defence it should be considered a fatal error.
I tend to disagree with Simon, which I seldom do, many of my offence notices (I write several hundred a year) over my career HAVE been amended for this omission. The JPs tend to rule it's not a serious impediment to defending yourself. You know the substance of the offence and the section number can easily be looked up. Just sayin'
I tend to disagree with Simon, which I seldom do, many of my offence notices (I write several hundred a year) over my career HAVE been amended for this omission.
The JPs tend to rule it's not a serious impediment to defending yourself.
You know the substance of the offence and the section number can easily be looked up.
It used to be that "submissions like that" needed to be objectioned before jurisdiction was determined. ie: as you approach the bench you object. Then point out the omission. I beat at least 3 tickets that way back when I was a speeder. I believe that the ticket can be amended only after the trial has started. Cheers Viper1
It used to be that "submissions like that"
needed to be objectioned before jurisdiction was determined.
ie: as you approach the bench you object.
Then point out the omission.
I beat at least 3 tickets that way back when I was a speeder.
I believe that the ticket can be amended only after the trial has started.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
Here on a part 1 it seems to be hit or miss. Seems to depend on JP and prosecutor of they chose to run with it. If a person has a good record they seem to withdraw. Poor record they fight hard. On a part 3 it seems to have no bearing as the first court date it is explained and all proper defense cab be in place for the trial.
Here on a part 1 it seems to be hit or miss. Seems to depend on JP and prosecutor of they chose to run with it. If a person has a good record they seem to withdraw. Poor record they fight hard.
On a part 3 it seems to have no bearing as the first court date it is explained and all proper defense cab be in place for the trial.
I really need help on fighting my 9 tickets i received from one police officer. Here is some background of what happened!
I was caught speeding 66km on a 40km (school zone) on January 29, 2010. I was driving my friend's car and turns out she didnt renew the validation on the vehicle and…
Back in April my wife got a 76 in a 50 charge and the officer knocked it down to 60 in a 50.
Checked the ticket but no fatal errors. Asked for trial and requested disclosure. Got the full radar manual and officers notes. His notes were pretty much bullet proof with tracking history and the TEST…
I have a charge of Stop at through highway: 136. (1) Every driver or street car operator approaching a stop sign at an intersection,
(b) shall yield the right of way to traffic in the intersection or approaching the intersection on another highway so closely that to proceed would constitute an…
Long story short. Got a speeding ticket last July 07 and asked for disclosure. It never came. Went to court In january and explained this but I had no proof. So an adjournment was granted to May 30 to obtain disclosure. Received a notice in the mail that officer will be on vacation that week.…
I just got a ticket for improper right turn . it happens on HY403 and Eglinton - Mississauga.
I'm from London,ON, the cop did not ask any questions and he came back with a ticket and he said "you are from London,ON!" I said yes. Then he said something I did not understand but then…
I am hoping to get advice on how to proceed with my defence regarding a ticket I received for improper use of a high occupancy vehicle lane on an interprovincial bridge between Hull, QC and Ottawa, ON. The ticket was given in Ottawa by the Ottawa Police.
So I was pulled over this morning and slammed with a ticket of 132 in posted 100 on hwy - which is the speed he claimed I was going (didnt drop at all)... I asked why he didnt drop it at all? The PO insisted I fight it. I replied I didnt have the time to get off work. He continued to insist I fight…