Hello all and GREAT forum! I was just convicted by default for a failure to stop - red light infraction. I am planning to appeal the conviction, since set fine on ticket is $85 where it should have been $260, and therefore is irregular on it's face (cite London vs Young). My question is, am I still obligated to pay the fine, and if so, will it be refunded if I win? Lastly, what are the odds of insurance finding out about this offence and hike up my rates because of it?
Hello all and GREAT forum!
I was just convicted by default for a failure to stop - red light infraction. I am planning to appeal the conviction, since set fine on ticket is $85 where it should have been $260, and therefore is irregular on it's face (cite London vs Young). My question is, am I still obligated to pay the fine, and if so, will it be refunded if I win?
Lastly, what are the odds of insurance finding out about this offence and hike up my rates because of it?
I went through the same thing last year with a fail to stop read light ticket that had an incorrect set fine on it, so I have a bit of experience with the situation you are in. When you file your appeal you will have to pay the total payable that is listed on your ticket even though it is incorrect. If you win your appeal you will receive a full refund, although it can take up to 120 days for them to send out the refund cheque. The ticket will not appear on your driving record until after your appeal has been heard and if you win your appeal it will never show up on your driving record and thus your insurance company will never hear about it. If you lose it will show up on your record and your insurance company will probably find out about it. As for whether they would hike your rates it depends on the policies of your insurance company, some will forgive the first minor infraction within a three year period some won't.
I went through the same thing last year with a fail to stop read light ticket that had an incorrect set fine on it, so I have a bit of experience with the situation you are in. When you file your appeal you will have to pay the total payable that is listed on your ticket even though it is incorrect. If you win your appeal you will receive a full refund, although it can take up to 120 days for them to send out the refund cheque. The ticket will not appear on your driving record until after your appeal has been heard and if you win your appeal it will never show up on your driving record and thus your insurance company will never hear about it. If you lose it will show up on your record and your insurance company will probably find out about it. As for whether they would hike your rates it depends on the policies of your insurance company, some will forgive the first minor infraction within a three year period some won't.
Daggx, Thanks for the reply! I hope you'll be able to give me some guidance in my situation, it will be greatly appreciated! Wondering, how long after your application for appeal to you have your court date? Thanks again
Daggx,
Thanks for the reply! I hope you'll be able to give me some guidance in my situation, it will be greatly appreciated!
Wondering, how long after your application for appeal to you have your court date?
I'm not entirely sure about the appealed conviction showing up on an abstract. When I access MTO records via the police database I see a conviction with an asterisk noting that the conviction is under appeal. I'm not sure what database the insurance company would access.
daggx wrote:
I went through the same thing last year with a fail to stop read light ticket that had an incorrect set fine on it, so I have a bit of experience with the situation you are in. When you file your appeal you will have to pay the total payable that is listed on your ticket even though it is incorrect. If you win your appeal you will receive a full refund, although it can take up to 120 days for them to send out the refund cheque. The ticket will not appear on your driving record until after your appeal has been heard and if you win your appeal it will never show up on your driving record and thus your insurance company will never hear about it. If you lose it will show up on your record and your insurance company will probably find out about it. As for whether they would hike your rates it depends on the policies of your insurance company, some will forgive the first minor infraction within a three year period some won't.
I'm not entirely sure about the appealed conviction showing up on an abstract. When I access MTO records via the police database I see a conviction with an asterisk noting that the conviction is under appeal. I'm not sure what database the insurance company would access.
No problem, I'm happy to help any way I can. I filed my appeal on the 10th of August and my court date was the 9th of January, so I waited nearly 5 months for my appeal to be heard. That was at the Old City Hall court house in Toronto, the length of time you will wait will depend on what the back log is like at the court house where your case is scheduled.
hatetickets wrote:
Daggx,
Thanks for the reply! I hope you'll be able to give me some guidance in my situation, it will be greatly appreciated!
Wondering, how long after your application for appeal to you have your court date?
Thanks again
No problem, I'm happy to help any way I can. I filed my appeal on the 10th of August and my court date was the 9th of January, so I waited nearly 5 months for my appeal to be heard. That was at the Old City Hall court house in Toronto, the length of time you will wait will depend on what the back log is like at the court house where your case is scheduled.
I'm not entirely sure about the appealed conviction showing up on an abstract. When I access MTO records via the police database I see a conviction with an asterisk noting that the conviction is under appeal. I'm not sure what database the insurance company would access. I think the insurance companies only have access to the three year Statement of Driving Record that is public record and available to anyone who can pay the fee. The police database I believe shows everything that has happened on a persons licence going all the way back to the beginning when they first got their licence, so it may show things in greater detail then what is on the three year Statement of Driving Record. Although it is also possible that when I was told that it doesn't show on your record the person may have simply meant that the insurance company can't raise your rates based on something that is still before the courts even if there is a notation in the file.
Brian Smith wrote:
daggx wrote:
I went through the same thing last year with a fail to stop read light ticket that had an incorrect set fine on it, so I have a bit of experience with the situation you are in. When you file your appeal you will have to pay the total payable that is listed on your ticket even though it is incorrect. If you win your appeal you will receive a full refund, although it can take up to 120 days for them to send out the refund cheque. The ticket will not appear on your driving record until after your appeal has been heard and if you win your appeal it will never show up on your driving record and thus your insurance company will never hear about it. If you lose it will show up on your record and your insurance company will probably find out about it. As for whether they would hike your rates it depends on the policies of your insurance company, some will forgive the first minor infraction within a three year period some won't.
I'm not entirely sure about the appealed conviction showing up on an abstract. When I access MTO records via the police database I see a conviction with an asterisk noting that the conviction is under appeal. I'm not sure what database the insurance company would access.
I think the insurance companies only have access to the three year Statement of Driving Record that is public record and available to anyone who can pay the fee. The police database I believe shows everything that has happened on a persons licence going all the way back to the beginning when they first got their licence, so it may show things in greater detail then what is on the three year Statement of Driving Record. Although it is also possible that when I was told that it doesn't show on your record the person may have simply meant that the insurance company can't raise your rates based on something that is still before the courts even if there is a notation in the file.
Thanks daggx. Went this morning first to Caledon to pay fine, then asked for appeal form which I filled out and submitted at the Orangeville Courthouse. Not too much involved just a bit of running from this area to the next, to the next. The clerk called me this afternoon to tell me the court date will be mailed out to me. Is there a chance the prosecutor will try to convince me to settle on something prior to the court date, or on the actual court date? If so, tell him/her no thanks? Lastly , what happens on the acutal court date. I've never been to court before so I know absolutley nothing on what to expect or what to say. Thanks for your assistance...beer's on me WHEN I win!
Thanks daggx.
Went this morning first to Caledon to pay fine, then asked for appeal form which I filled out and submitted at the Orangeville Courthouse. Not too much involved just a bit of running from this area to the next, to the next.
The clerk called me this afternoon to tell me the court date will be mailed out to me.
Is there a chance the prosecutor will try to convince me to settle on something prior to the court date, or on the actual court date? If so, tell him/her no thanks?
Lastly , what happens on the acutal court date. I've never been to court before so I know absolutley nothing on what to expect or what to say.
Thanks for your assistance...beer's on me WHEN I win!
The prosecutor might offer a deal, but if you have a solid London v. Young case I would decline it as you are in a position to win your case outright. At court they will open the doors probably about 15 mins before they start hearing cases, the prosecutor handling your case may approach you just to make sure you are there. When the judge enters everyone will be asked to rise, once the judge has taken his/her seat the clerk will call the name of the person involved in the first case of the day. When your name is called you will be asked to approach the podium and state your name for the record, then you will be asked to make your case. Make sure when you address the judge that you always refer to him/her as your honour as that is their proper title. At this point what will happen depends on the judge you've got. At my trial I lucked out and got a very experienced judge who was familiar with London v. Young. All he did was flip through my paperwork and ask a couple of questions of me and the prosecutor before quashing my ticket. The prosecutor in my case didn't put up a real fight, I think she realized that there really wasn't anything she could do. However don't assume it will be that easy, come prepared to educate the judge on the London v. Young case (and any other case law you want to use) and be prepared to make arguments supporting your position in case the prosecutor puts up a fight. Bring three copies of all the case law you are going to use, one for the judge, one for the prosecutor and one for you, you will be expected to have those ready to hand out if you are going to quote from them. I would go though the case law and on your copy put sticky notes next to any paragraphs you might want to quote directly from, that will make them easier to find when you are up there. I would also have good notes outlining the key arguments you want to make. I don't know if you have seen them already, but I've posted links to a couple of threads where other people outline their experiences in court, hopefully they are useful. http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic2521.html http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1730.html
The prosecutor might offer a deal, but if you have a solid London v. Young case I would decline it as you are in a position to win your case outright.
At court they will open the doors probably about 15 mins before they start hearing cases, the prosecutor handling your case may approach you just to make sure you are there. When the judge enters everyone will be asked to rise, once the judge has taken his/her seat the clerk will call the name of the person involved in the first case of the day. When your name is called you will be asked to approach the podium and state your name for the record, then you will be asked to make your case. Make sure when you address the judge that you always refer to him/her as your honour as that is their proper title. At this point what will happen depends on the judge you've got. At my trial I lucked out and got a very experienced judge who was familiar with London v. Young. All he did was flip through my paperwork and ask a couple of questions of me and the prosecutor before quashing my ticket. The prosecutor in my case didn't put up a real fight, I think she realized that there really wasn't anything she could do. However don't assume it will be that easy, come prepared to educate the judge on the London v. Young case (and any other case law you want to use) and be prepared to make arguments supporting your position in case the prosecutor puts up a fight. Bring three copies of all the case law you are going to use, one for the judge, one for the prosecutor and one for you, you will be expected to have those ready to hand out if you are going to quote from them. I would go though the case law and on your copy put sticky notes next to any paragraphs you might want to quote directly from, that will make them easier to find when you are up there. I would also have good notes outlining the key arguments you want to make. I don't know if you have seen them already, but I've posted links to a couple of threads where other people outline their experiences in court, hopefully they are useful.
CanLII (Canadian Legal Information Institute) is a great free resource with lots of case law. Link: http://www.canlii.org/en/ And here's a link to London (City) v. Young: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/20 ... ca429.html
CanLII (Canadian Legal Information Institute) is a great free resource with lots of case law.
Ok, I hate asking so many questions but, Is there a chance that they might try to 'ammend' the set fine in court? Is it not possible since this is an appeal?
Ok, I hate asking so many questions but,
Is there a chance that they might try to 'ammend' the set fine in court? Is it not possible since this is an appeal?
At this stage in the process it is too late for them to amend the set fine. If they had caught the mistake before it had gone to the default docket they could have withdrawn the ticket and issued you a summons or if you had requested a regular trial they could have asked the Justice of the Peace to amend the set fine. However once the ticket went before a Justice of the Peace for a default hearing the mistake was set in stone. At that point the law only gave the Justice of the Peace two choices 1) find that the ticket was correct and regular on its face and impose the set fine or 2) find the ticket was not correct and regular on its face and quash the proceedings. All the judge at the appeal hearing can do is review the actions of the lower court to see if they made a mistake in law, which you are going to argue they did because the lower court should have noticed that your ticket was not correct and regular on its face and quashed the proceedings against you. Feel free to keep asking questions, I'm always glad to answer them if I can.
hatetickets wrote:
Ok, I hate asking so many questions but,
Is there a chance that they might try to 'ammend' the set fine in court? Is it not possible since this is an appeal?
At this stage in the process it is too late for them to amend the set fine. If they had caught the mistake before it had gone to the default docket they could have withdrawn the ticket and issued you a summons or if you had requested a regular trial they could have asked the Justice of the Peace to amend the set fine. However once the ticket went before a Justice of the Peace for a default hearing the mistake was set in stone. At that point the law only gave the Justice of the Peace two choices 1) find that the ticket was correct and regular on its face and impose the set fine or 2) find the ticket was not correct and regular on its face and quash the proceedings. All the judge at the appeal hearing can do is review the actions of the lower court to see if they made a mistake in law, which you are going to argue they did because the lower court should have noticed that your ticket was not correct and regular on its face and quashed the proceedings against you. Feel free to keep asking questions, I'm always glad to answer them if I can.
Well, I still have not received my court date for my appeal in the mail. Does anyone know how long it usually takes? The courthouse admin called me the same day I filed and said that the appeal application was fine and will receive a date in the mail. It's been over 3 weeks now and still no date!
Well,
I still have not received my court date for my appeal in the mail. Does anyone know how long it usually takes? The courthouse admin called me the same day I filed and said that the appeal application was fine and will receive a date in the mail. It's been over 3 weeks now and still no date!
Hello everyone. Well i've received my appeal date for April 4. I am in need of some help on presenting my case. I will be citing City of London vs. Young as my case law but do not know how to present it to the court. My case will be heard at 14:00 so I am planning on being there early to see how the other cases go. Any help will be appreciated!
Hello everyone.
Well i've received my appeal date for April 4. I am in need of some help on presenting my case. I will be citing City of London vs. Young as my case law but do not know how to present it to the court. My case will be heard at 14:00 so I am planning on being there early to see how the other cases go.
Thanks for the reply. I was planning on going to the court house early (my time is 2pm) but worried that there will be no prior cases similar to mine as it is an appeal.
Thanks for the reply.
I was planning on going to the court house early (my time is 2pm) but worried that there will be no prior cases similar to mine as it is an appeal.
ok well here is my story .. I had an old megaphone from alarm system and decided since my horns on my car were rusted and were not making a loud enough sound.. i connected the alarm megaphone to the horn wires and it sounded very cool. depending on how log i hold my horn down for . due to the size of the power horn.. and mhy car being a Honda.. meaning no room under the hood i had installed it…
So I got this ticket because the lady behind me was WAY too close and I had to back up before getting hit by another car and dented her bumper.
Offense is stated as follows: Start from Stopped position - Not in Safety
Highway Traffic Act 142 (2)
First of all, I don't really know what that means and if it says that I was not in safety (which I wasn't) why am I getting a ticket? And why didn't the…
This is my first time ever getting a ticket and I am completely frustrated and don't know what to do.
On July 7th, I was driving to work, taking my usual route and it's about a 15 minute drive for me. At the first red light, I noticed I had a bit of time thanks to the countdown so I quickly reached into my bag to grab a lip balm. I noticed I had brought the wrong one so I just kept it out and…
It happened last December. I was facing north in the middle of the intersection at Donmills and McNicoll waiting to make a left turn. There was a big white van on the other side of McNicoll facing south waiting to turn left too. When the light changed to amber, I checked and the road was clear, there was no upcoming vehicle. So slowly I made the left turn. Suddenly a small car dashed up from…
First off, the most similar case and HELPFUL thread has y far come from neo333: a great read and very similar and relevant to my case and of course ticketcombat.com
I'll cole's notes this so that it can be concise and can recap my experience with disclosure, notes and failed stay request and adjourned court date. Thank you for reading and leaving your opinion.
I got a notice in the mail that trial is set four weeks from today, so it's time to request disclosure. I have zero chance of getting an 11b since trial is less than two months after the offense date and the officer did not reduce the charge. I really want to try and create delays on the trial, to reduce the chance of the officer showing up on multiple occasions. Is there any known loop-holes…
Got my first ticket last Thursday and I have a couple of questions. I was driving westbound on Moore St. (west of Bayview) and made a left onto a residential street at a 4-way stop sign. It was my first time driving through that area - was driving my girlfriend to a wisdom tooth surgery.
The police were set up to catch people, as that intersection had a no left turn sign from 7-9 am (buses…
I was in a light collision with a police vehicle last November and will be having a trial by the end of the month. What happened was I was pulled over. I stopped and kept my right signal on. The cop car then tried to pull behind me when he was on my left but 2 cars pulled behind me. The cop wasn't too smart and instead of waiting for the two cars to pull away, he drove forward and boxed all the…
A friend of mine (who is from China and with no knowledge of English at all) asked me to interpret for him on court.
He got pulled over by a stealth patrol car last october, got 3 tickets (fail to show insurance card, using cell phones and fail to stop on right for emergency vehicle) , court date is next week. He told me his insurance expired for less than a month and other charges are false…
My husband was driving my car and passed a school bus with flashing lights. He did not realize this until he was past the bus. The driver honked at him but there were no cops nearby and he didn't get pulled over. I believe the driver or witnesses reported this and we got issued a ticket in the mail. The ticket is under my name as the registered owner: charged with Fail to Stop for…
I have just got a ticket (Fail to yield on through highway) and by the way it's me first ticket and this is how I got it.
Me driving in a residential neighborhood maybe 10-15 km/h approaching a stop sign completely stopped at the stop sign started moving again turning right and out of nowhere I was hit by this van. he went directly to the driver's side fender,wheel, and bumper. Since it was my…
Hi I'm new to this forum but I hope I'm bringing you all good news.
I recently wrote a book short titled ABUSE OF POWER
This book is all about how the Ontario government broke the law to enact the new street racing legislation.
To start with the denial of the right to remain innocent until proven guilty was enacted without due process under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. How it wasn't done…
So i lent my car to my gf the other day and she went to drop her friend at a Go station but when she was turning left into the parking lot at the Go station a bus hits her from behind while she was turning so now my rear fender is pushed in and more scrathes and my bumper is damaged...but the cop that showed up just kept telling my gf thats its her fault cause its private property...is that true…
Hi, thanks for reading. I've read a bunch of articles online and searched the forum to try and find my answers but I'm still unsure so I'm creating a new thread.
I was following a car that was going SUPER fast down the DVP but I got pulled over. I was speeding, too; however I don't want to use the "you got the wrong guy" defence because I'll probably lose.
I left my home at 4 am to pick up my daughter from downtown Toronto. When I passed the major intersection south of my house there were two police cars in the middle of the intersection and one officer waved me through the intersection.
When I returned with my daughter at 5:30 am the police cars were still in the intersection. I slowed down as I approached the intersection but the police were no…
I will be representing my wife at her speeding trial next week. Mostly everything is pretty much run of the mill but since she wasn't speeding we will be having her take the stand. Since this opens up the opportunity for the prosecutor to cross examine, I am just wondering if anyone here knows what kind of questions we should expect from the prosecutor in order to best prepare.
When the court sends out the notice of trial, do they use the address the officer wrote on the ticket, or the actual address in the MTO database? In the case of the former, what are the implications? The reason I ask is that my wife got a ticket last week and the officer wrote the wrong city on it.
This topic discusses the same thing but with CN police; is it any different for regular offences?
Driving onto ramp entering a major highway, posted limit is 100km/h, suggested ramp limit is 40km/h - I end up colliding with the concrete barrier on the passenger side of the vehicle.
Police arrive, suspect alcohol and breathalyze me with a result of 0.00 - I am asked for a statement and cautioned, however (stupidly) I proceed to provide the details anyways.
My friends and I were heading to Kelso Beach, I had signalled and i pulled off to the shoulder as my car seemed to be making noise, but after riding over the shoulder the noise stopped, i signalled back again and merged back into traffic after making sure it was safe, the officer which was ahead of me on the shoulder a few meters away pulled me over.…
I've decided to fight a traffic ticket for stop sign violation. The offense was 12 months ago, and I've got a court date for next Tuesday. I've requested disclosure and, although a bit last minute, received it two weeks before my court date.
Upon reviewing the case materials, there isn't much of a defense I can find -based on the cop having an obstructed view, or any mistakes in the…
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I'm a newbie, so be kind if I'm messing up. Question: is it illegal to signal oncoming traffic that they are approaching a speed trap by flashing one's lights?
I ask because I was stopped for doing that yesterday evening, but did not end up with a ticket. The officer spend 5-10 minutes n his car, then sent me on my way. I'm wondering if he changed his mind or found out it was legal.