Ontario Highway Traffic Act

You know, maybe they should ban parents from buying souped-up cars for their kids. Maybe they should hold parents accountable when they don't take the keys away from their kids when they drive like Mulcahy's son. Reasonable? Not really, but to a certain extent that'd make more sense than these new laws.
No, it is simply easier to tax the living ...

Reflections wrote:Do we have terabytes worth of space for this???????

We'd better, our hosting gives us unlimited storage space

Was it Cicero who said "The more laws, the less justice"? We need to get rid of the clutter of old laws, not make new ones every time there is an accident.....

MS. CARTER: I believe it'd be the Crown's submissions first as we're offering no defense evidence.
Lawmen: you just don't get it. Charter rights are so 1990s. This is Ontario 2008: Roll-over. Play dead. Good defendant.:-)

Haha!

I'm not the submissive type.

This is the only s. 172 case I've seen posted. Apparently there are thousands of them ...

Thank you, that was so cute...

You should plead not guilty (the trial option) and see the disclosure. It will be mailed to you once you request it, no need picking it up. See a prosecutor on one of the dates that will be provided about lowering your charge to 15 over. In the worst case scenario 29 over is the worst you will be charged with.

To: ALL FORUM MEMBERS

We are having a little celebration today. Today, www.OntarioHighwayTrafficAct.com is exactly one year old!
The domain is older than that, but the forum has been only finalized on November 13, 2007.


When we have started the forum, we have had no clue of what it was going to turn out into. In so far, thanks for all your ...

Yeah but, A GULLY/LAW post might crash the site...........

Just having a little fun........keep up the research boys.


Hwybear may be right. Together we could crash this site - or if not that maybe the legislature.


This site cannot be crashed :lol: (I hope.........) If you do, where are you guys gonna vent your anger at all thing driving ...

I sure hope that this bill gets voted down (although my opinions seemingly aren't too popular in the Queen's Park). Just another cash grab more than anything. Why stop at motorcycles? Why not have "no kids under 14" in all "Vehicles" on all "Highways"?

Does that mean I can bike home from a bar? Sweet !

Something is really wrong when i ask 200 people if they knew about this law and only 10 did and that because they were truck drivers . Why is this !! i ask everyone , when on any highway if you can move over to left if you can , it may save someone life .thanks and please spread the word about this law . the hun :D

Ignorance doesn't free one ...

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety [quoted via Wikipedia ] Roundabouts are safer than both traffic circles and traditional intersections—having 40% fewer vehicle collisions, 80% fewer injuries and 90% fewer serious injuries and fatalities (according to a study of a sampling of roundabouts in the United States, compared with ...

I've heard this rough formula, that is the length of braking travel in metres roughly equals 1/2 of your speed in kilometres per hour, that is if you are going 100 KMH it will take about 50 m to stop (that ties with 42 m to stop + reaction time to press the brake). Just a good short way of measuring your stoppage distance. Works for cars only.

hwybear wrote:
Yup, my first new vehicle will be a

You, Sire, need to live in Russian Federation, where it is street legal to drive a tank as long as it has no ammunition and all weaponry is taken off.

Did you post this elsewhere by any chance?

Ask for disclosure first, see what evidence the cop has against you. Remember, he must have the reading from the radar. Him saying something like "I was going 135, he was a bit slower, thus 131" won't do.