Ontario Highway Traffic Act

Relevant case-law states that the requirement for testing times is up to the presiding trial justice (justice of peace). So a JP can be satisfied that the officer tested the device before and after his shift without testing times.

You can read more about testing times here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1909-15.html#p30553

You can ...

Your adjournment only accounts for a one month delay. I don't think you understand how 11b time calculations are done, you should review R. v. Andrade: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2011/2011oncj470/2011oncj470.html

From what you described the officer has another opportunity to appear for your next trial. Just like how you requested an ...

Rough Timeline

Received Ticket: Nov 2013
1st Trial: Aug 2014
2nd Trial: Sep 2014
3rd Trial: ????

You're at-fault for the time between the 2nd and 1st trial. But the rest is the crown's fault. I would consider an 11b application.

Prosecutor will always plea-bargain in order to avoid a lengthy trial.

I would try calling the residents at 38 Trefann St: http://www.canada411.ca/res/4165198410/G-Nigh/205767067.html

Tell them you received a ticket in front on their property, and if they know what happened.

To receive this type of ticket, the property owner would have contacted parking enforcement. So if you can't get information from the city, you ...

No, I would not be worried about incarceration. If you're getting representation, they will most likely plea-bargain the charge from S172 to +49km/h under S128 of the HTA.

Again, take a look at the fault determination rules. It seems that if a collision does occur you will not be found at-fault. Having said that, you should exercise a lot of caution when using the centre lane.

Vehicles should never block intersections/driveways/entrances/exits, especially because you never know when emergency vehicles need to enter ...

What's the name of the side street? Maybe using Streetview will help us better visualize this intersection.

You can also look at fault determination rules and see if your scenario is there: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0668_e.htm

Unfortunately, those are not fatal errors: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1965.html

Request disclosure: officer's notes & copy of the speed measuring device's manual: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1965.html

He's asking you irrelevant questions, so you might as well answer those in the hopes he might let you off with a warning. Although it's always advisable not to talk to police; because they're human and w/e you say can be misinterpreted in a court of law; in this case he already has all the essential elements to get a conviction; he already knows ...

Keep in mind that case-law states that the requirement for testing times is up to the presiding trial justice (justice of peace). So a JP can be satisfied that the officer tested the device before and after his shift without testing times.

You can read more about testing times here: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic1909-15.html#p30553 ...

I do not have collision on my truck so in others words I guess I'm pretty screwed in this case? Damages for the other parties are still covered under your insurance policy up to your max. liability (usually $1 million); Collision coverage is only for your truck. So if you get into an at-fault accident, your insurance company will not repair your ...

That $172 is only going to increase, it'll be in your best interest to pay it out. There will be an arrest warrant for you in Quebec. So if law enforcement run your id or driver's license you'll be arrested, taken to jail and put in front of a french judge... at which point you'll either pay the fine + admin charges or setup a payment program ...

I was looking at the strategies on ticketcombat.com and amateurishly concluded that my best defence is the due diligence approach. Physically drained + the surprise of seeing a friend + the surprise of the pool offering + the known proximity of his house led me to just get in my car and drive. That combined with my clean record in my 8 years prior ...

Unfortunately, it's going to be your word against his at this point... it may ultimately be 50/50 or 100% your fault.

Fault determination rules suggests both drivers can be at fault here. The other driver when facing an amber light must come to a complete stop. From your observation the vehicle came to a complete stop. The vehicle made a right ...