Banning policies racer wrote:Spambots will be banned immediately upon discovery, as well as any users who do not have a single post for more than 30 days, as this is typical of spambots.
I hope that it's 30 days from registration and not just any 30-day period.
Hello Bear,
hwybear wrote:Alexo....did not take that offensive or upsetting.
It was not meant to be.
hwybear wrote:I see your view. There are reasons behind what you mention and not what you might think.
Then please educate me.
hwybear wrote:Also have…
Re: GPS hwybear wrote:Just bought my 1st GPS. Pretty decent little outfit. Have used it on a couple of short trips and got me to the destintation properly.
Hello Bear,
I hope your GPS does not include an MP3 player, a JPEG viewer, a calculator or a bluetooth m…
Hello Bear,
There is a rant coming. I will try to keep it short and civil but make no mistake, I feel very strongly about it.
hwybear wrote:This kind of stuff should never ever happen.
Unfortunately employees like this are in every profession and taint…
Hello Bear,
hwybear wrote:About 3/4 way down is the officers signature and DATE to the right is the supervisor signature and DATE. How does this compare to the date of the collision at the top?
The Officer's signature and date is 6 months after the …
hwybear wrote:alexo wrote:The interesting part is that the "Traffic Collision Report" I got on the spot (with the ticket) has quite a number of differences from the copy I got in the disclosure. That one was dated 6 months after the fact..
The…
Hi Bookm, thank you for the reply.
Bookm wrote:Sure the Court COULD allow the ticket to be amended, but you would want to object to this. You have prepared your case based on the information shown on the charging document. Your court date is now and you a…
lawmen wrote:alexo wrote:However, I was charged with violating 142(1) and not 148.
I believe that the best strategy would be to contest it on that grounds.
What do you guys, think?
I do not think that they can amend it during the trial as that would be …
Re: Disclosure questions hwybear wrote:A few issues here. By HTA police have to submit the Collision Report within 10 days. Our internal policy is 7 days.
The collision report I got in the disclosure was dated 6 months after the fact.
My understanding of the filing procedure i…
Re: Disclosure questions ticketcombat wrote:First, thanks for the positive feedback on my site.
You deserve it.
ticketcombat wrote:As I don't know the details, I can speculate that you asked for disclosure, they did nothing for eight months and then just before the trial, somebo…
hwybear wrote:alexo wrote:More or less. Cop's notes say I "cut the corner". Interesting since he arrived an hour after the fact..
Does not really matter how long after that the police arrive. Once arriving the officer will begin by talking to …
Thanks for your reply hwybear.
hwybear wrote:I would be guess that HTA 148 applies to the description provided.
Passing meeting vehicles - vehicle on highway meeting another shall turn out to the right from centre of roadway, allowing the other vehicle o…
lawmen wrote:You said there was no accident i.e., damage or injury?
Did I? I'm sorry, English is not my native language and I am even less familiar with legal terms.
When I said "collision" I meant an accident.
There was no injury but there wa…
ticketcombat wrote:This is really a great example to request disclosure including a request for an explanation and clarification of the charge. Let them do the work. They must bring home to the accused what he did wrong. You are asking "what did I…
Disclosure questions Hello people,
Some questions:
1. What should be a reasonable time for the prosecutor to provide disclosure from the first faxed request (2 reminders were sent as well)?
Is 8 months reasonable? If not, is there anything one can do about it?
2. The disc…
lawmen wrote:Try the Supreme Court of Canada for caselaw with respect to lanes.
Nothing relevant on csc.lexum.umontreal.ca
The only case I found that mentions an unmarked centre line, does not use the word "lane" (Armand v. Carr, [1926] S.C.R. 5…
Hi lawmen, thanks for your reply.
lawmen wrote:Interesting case. Keep searching case law and you might find something to help you.
Gladly but I feel I'm not getting any relevant info from CanLII.
Any suggestions where to look? Or maybe I'm searching inco…
