Just bought my 1st GPS. Pretty decent little outfit. Have used it on a couple of short trips and got me to the destintation properly. I have taken it to work recently and it is not as accurate as I first had hoped. The calculation of my vehicle speed is off by 2km/hr (GPS reads high). When stationary in many locations, it does not place me exactly where I am parked. On 2 different times it placed me about 15m away from where I was actually parked. Area was flat, level, no trees. Overall, I would use it to get to destinations, but would not rely on it for precision/pinpoint location, but merely a guide only.
Just bought my 1st GPS. Pretty decent little outfit. Have used it on a couple of short trips and got me to the destintation properly.
I have taken it to work recently and it is not as accurate as I first had hoped. The calculation of my vehicle speed is off by 2km/hr (GPS reads high). When stationary in many locations, it does not place me exactly where I am parked. On 2 different times it placed me about 15m away from where I was actually parked. Area was flat, level, no trees.
Overall, I would use it to get to destinations, but would not rely on it for precision/pinpoint location, but merely a guide only.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
You nailed the GPS accuracy bang-on. A lot of people mistakenly assume consumer GPS equipment has "pin-point" accuracy but the best it can do is about 15m. The GPS signal is managed by the US Air Force (50th Space Wing) which encrypts it. The pin-point accuracy is reserved for the military. Land surveying uses techniques to correct this but it's a cumbersome process involving a base station and multiple receivers.
You nailed the GPS accuracy bang-on. A lot of people mistakenly assume consumer GPS equipment has "pin-point" accuracy but the best it can do is about 15m. The GPS signal is managed by the US Air Force (50th Space Wing) which encrypts it. The pin-point accuracy is reserved for the military.
Land surveying uses techniques to correct this but it's a cumbersome process involving a base station and multiple receivers.
As ticketcombat explains, GPS for consumer use is never 100% accurate. I had the same frustration when I first used my GPS. It is a TomTom which is not bad IMO, but I used it while walking lol, while visiting relatives in Florida, in a new neighbor hood. The GPS didn't exactly get me to my pin pointed location, but nevertheless it got me to the intended place quite accurately. Meaning I could see the place. But overall my TomTom is not too bad. It counts down the meters remaining to make a left turn for example, and I find it quite accurate. Maybe a meter or two off of my intended turn. Just thought I would share :D
As ticketcombat explains, GPS for consumer use is never 100% accurate.
I had the same frustration when I first used my GPS. It is a TomTom which is not bad IMO, but I used it while walking lol, while visiting relatives in Florida, in a new neighbor hood.
The GPS didn't exactly get me to my pin pointed location, but nevertheless it got me to the intended place quite accurately. Meaning I could see the place.
But overall my TomTom is not too bad. It counts down the meters remaining to make a left turn for example, and I find it quite accurate. Maybe a meter or two off of my intended turn.
I've had a TomTom for a couple of months now, and my experience is much like those above. It's very useful for navigation on a trip, much less so for hiking. I wonder if the speed over the ground is a factor; i.e., the little computer likes a relatively high rate of angular change between it and the satellites, and at a walking pace the rate of change is too slow. If I walk around my block carrying the thing it is nothing but confused, flailing around, trying to figure out what direction to point its compass: if I give it a ride around the same block in my car it's perfectly happy. I find that mine disagrees with my car's speedo by 2km/hr, like hwybear's, but mine is reading lower. I just assumed that my car's indicator was the one that was off, but hwybear's experience makes me wonder. Overall, though, a very useful gadget. Wish I'd had it in June and July when I was going to rugby games at addresses in foreign (to me) places like Wingham, Kincardine and Chatham from home here in Norfolk County. That's the sort of thing it does best.
I've had a TomTom for a couple of months now, and my experience is much like those above. It's very useful for navigation on a trip, much less so for hiking. I wonder if the speed over the ground is a factor; i.e., the little computer likes a relatively high rate of angular change between it and the satellites, and at a walking pace the rate of change is too slow. If I walk around my block carrying the thing it is nothing but confused, flailing around, trying to figure out what direction to point its compass: if I give it a ride around the same block in my car it's perfectly happy.
I find that mine disagrees with my car's speedo by 2km/hr, like hwybear's, but mine is reading lower. I just assumed that my car's indicator was the one that was off, but hwybear's experience makes me wonder.
Overall, though, a very useful gadget. Wish I'd had it in June and July when I was going to rugby games at addresses in foreign (to me) places like Wingham, Kincardine and Chatham from home here in Norfolk County. That's the sort of thing it does best.
The error is called "Multipath". Basically GPS receivers calculate location based on the satelite signals. But the signals also reflect off the surrounding terrain but are a little bit delayed than the direct signal. Your GPS picks up both and can't filter out the true signal. In your car, the GPS antenna is moving and the false reflected signals quickly fail to converge and only the direct signals result in accurate and stable calculations which the GPS uses to determine position. So I guess in theory, if you run really, really fast, you GPS would become more accurate. Perhaps use a neighbour's pitbull for motivation :-)
Proper1 wrote:
I wonder if the speed over the ground is a factor; i.e., the little computer likes a relatively high rate of angular change between it and the satellites, and at a walking pace the rate of change is too slow.
The error is called "Multipath". Basically GPS receivers calculate location based on the satelite signals. But the signals also reflect off the surrounding terrain but are a little bit delayed than the direct signal. Your GPS picks up both and can't filter out the true signal. In your car, the GPS antenna is moving and the false reflected signals quickly fail to converge and only the direct signals result in accurate and stable calculations which the GPS uses to determine position.
So I guess in theory, if you run really, really fast, you GPS would become more accurate. Perhaps use a neighbour's pitbull for motivation
One thing that helps GPS accuracy is ensuring that the antenna has a clear view of the sky. While the GPS won't be 100% accurate because Precise Positioning Service is only available to the US military, basically the more satellites it can see, the more accurate the position. When it's in a car, even if it is on the dashboard, it won't be able to get all of the possible satellites because the metal roof of the car acts to block some of the signals, even if you're in an open area. Even if you're out of the car, though, it will be off by a few metres one way or the other. Almost every modern airliner, and most General Aviation aircraft manufactured these days, comes with GPS. The GPS antenna is installed on top of the fuselage so that no part of the aircraft blocks its view of the satellites, and those systems have very good accuracy. They also have RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) which is a self-check that provides a warning if there aren't enough satellites in view, if there is a system fault or if there is a satellite fault or error. No hand-held GPS unit has RAIM, so if your GPS unit seems to be telling you that you're in Texas :shock: it's probably picking up a bad satellite but it won't tell you.
One thing that helps GPS accuracy is ensuring that the antenna has a clear view of the sky. While the GPS won't be 100% accurate because Precise Positioning Service is only available to the US military, basically the more satellites it can see, the more accurate the position. When it's in a car, even if it is on the dashboard, it won't be able to get all of the possible satellites because the metal roof of the car acts to block some of the signals, even if you're in an open area. Even if you're out of the car, though, it will be off by a few metres one way or the other.
Almost every modern airliner, and most General Aviation aircraft manufactured these days, comes with GPS. The GPS antenna is installed on top of the fuselage so that no part of the aircraft blocks its view of the satellites, and those systems have very good accuracy. They also have RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) which is a self-check that provides a warning if there aren't enough satellites in view, if there is a system fault or if there is a satellite fault or error. No hand-held GPS unit has RAIM, so if your GPS unit seems to be telling you that you're in Texas it's probably picking up a bad satellite but it won't tell you.
The GPS works on a principle of intersecting circles - your GPS receives the signal from 3 satellites, and they all send out a time stamp at the same time. The GPS receives those signals, compares the time it took to arrive from satellite to the GPS, and maps 3 circles, and they all intersect at one point. A fourth signal may be used to pinpoint your location in 3D. Small mistake in the computer using a floating-point precision where a double-floating-point precision should have been used and you are off 15 meters. You gotta realize that the satellite is some kilometers up in the sky. Also, the receiver is a point receiver, therefore it cannot determine the DIRECTION of your GPS. However, when you are in motion on a car/motorcycle, the software will put you on a proper lane and proper road. When you make a turn onto a mapped street the software will recalibrate the GPS receiver thus you have (apparently) more accurate reding. The software will also know which way you are headed, therefore it will show you the proper compass (although this is relative to your car's motion, again, as the GPS can be tilted. For walking around use something like Garmin eTrex or Geko or 60 or 72/76, as the software there is slightly more accurate.
The GPS works on a principle of intersecting circles - your GPS receives the signal from 3 satellites, and they all send out a time stamp at the same time. The GPS receives those signals, compares the time it took to arrive from satellite to the GPS, and maps 3 circles, and they all intersect at one point. A fourth signal may be used to pinpoint your location in 3D. Small mistake in the computer using a floating-point precision where a double-floating-point precision should have been used and you are off 15 meters. You gotta realize that the satellite is some kilometers up in the sky. Also, the receiver is a point receiver, therefore it cannot determine the DIRECTION of your GPS. However, when you are in motion on a car/motorcycle, the software will put you on a proper lane and proper road. When you make a turn onto a mapped street the software will recalibrate the GPS receiver thus you have (apparently) more accurate reding. The software will also know which way you are headed, therefore it will show you the proper compass (although this is relative to your car's motion, again, as the GPS can be tilted.
For walking around use something like Garmin eTrex or Geko or 60 or 72/76, as the software there is slightly more accurate.
"The more laws, the less justice" - Marcus Tullius Cicero
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Hwybear-did you calculate the speed accuracy from your cruisers odo, or radar? Just wondering, because at the local racetrack(1/4mile), my Garmin GPS was very accurate in giving me my top speed compared to the readout from the tracks timing system.
Hwybear-did you calculate the speed accuracy from your cruisers odo, or radar? Just wondering, because at the local racetrack(1/4mile), my Garmin GPS was very accurate in giving me my top speed compared to the readout from the tracks timing system.
On 3 different cruisers, 3 different radar units, the GPS reading was 2km/hr higher than what the actual speed showed on radar. One cruiser has cruise control so I could confirm my speed remained constant.
dntmstr wrote:
Hwybear-did you calculate the speed accuracy from your cruisers odo, or radar? Just wondering, because at the local racetrack(1/4mile), my Garmin GPS was very accurate in giving me my top speed compared to the readout from the tracks timing system.
On 3 different cruisers, 3 different radar units, the GPS reading was 2km/hr higher than what the actual speed showed on radar. One cruiser has cruise control so I could confirm my speed remained constant.
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Hello Bear, I hope your GPS does not include an MP3 player, a JPEG viewer, a calculator or a bluetooth module, otherwise bill 118 forbids its use in Ontario. I suspect that it was not the intention to ban most of the models being sold (all Garmin models and all PDAs with a built-in GPS) but that is the what the wording says. By the way, you're OK as long as you don't use it in your private car.
hwybear wrote:
Just bought my 1st GPS. Pretty decent little outfit. Have used it on a couple of short trips and got me to the destintation properly.
Hello Bear,
I hope your GPS does not include an MP3 player, a JPEG viewer, a calculator or a bluetooth module, otherwise bill 118 forbids its use in Ontario.
78. (1) No person shall drive on a highway a motor vehicle that is equipped with, carries, contains or has attached to it a television, computer or other device with a display screen if the display screen is visible to the driver.
Exceptions
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply in respect of,
(a) a global positioning system navigation device that has no other function than to deliver a global positioning system for navigation;
I suspect that it was not the intention to ban most of the models being sold (all Garmin models and all PDAs with a built-in GPS) but that is the what the wording says.
By the way, you're OK as long as you don't use it in your private car.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the driver of an ambulance, fire department vehicle or police department vehicle.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
it's probably picking up a bad satellite but it won't tell you.
Sometimes others tell me as well 
